Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:52:47.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pragmatic and semantic constraints on numeral quantifier position in Japanese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Pamela Downing
Pamela Downing
Affiliation:
Department of English and Comparative Literature, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Japanese, like many other languages, permits numeral expressions to appear in several positions relative to the argument whose number they specify. This article concentrates on just two of the possibilities, the ‘Pre-Nominal’ and the ‘Q-Float’ numeral positions, describing a number of semantic, syntactic and pragmatic differences between them.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 65 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aissen, Judith (1984). Themes and absolutives; some semantic rules in Tzotzil. In Cook, Eungdo & Gerdts, Donna B. (eds.) Syntax and semantics, vol. 16. New York: Academic Press. 1–20.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. (1977). Comments on the paper by Wasow. In Culicover, Peter W., Akmaijian, A. & Wasow, T. (eds.) Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press. 361–378.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. (1980). The pear stories. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Tomlin, Russell S. (ed.) Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Wilkins, Wendy (1986). Control, pro, and the projection principle. Lg 62. 120–153.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela. (1984). Japanese numeral classifiers: a syntactic, semantic, and functional profile. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Lg 63. 805–855.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Van Valin, Robert D. (1977). On the viability of the notion of ‘subject’ in universal grammar. In Whistler, Kenneth et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the third annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 293–320.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. (1987). Surface case and grammatical relations in Korean: the evidence from quantifier float. Studies in Language 11. 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy (1975). Focus and scope of assertion: some Bantu evidence. Studies in African Linguistics 6. 185–205.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy (1981). On the development of the numeral ‘one’ as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica 2. 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy (1983). Topic continuity in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph (1972). Numeral classifiers and substantival number: problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers on Langauge Universals 9. 1–39.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey S. (1965). Studies in lexical relations. Unpublished PhD dissertation. MIT. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Circle.Google Scholar
Haig, John H. (1980). Some observations on quantifier float in Japanese. Linguistics 18. 1068–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John (1988). Some processing motivations for linear order universals. Ms.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul (1986). Some discourse functions of classifiers in Malay. In Craig, Colette (ed.) Noun classes and categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Lg 56. 251–299.Google Scholar
Inoue, Kazuko (1978). Nihongo no bunpoo hoosoku. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio (1983). Meisiku no koozoo. In Inoue, Kazuko (ed.) Nihongo no kihon koozoo. Tokyo: Sanseidoo. 77–126.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1976). Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Li Charles, N. (ed.) Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. 303–333.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1984). Semantic correlates of the ergative/absolutive distinction. Linguistics 12. 17–223.Google Scholar
Kim, Alan Hyun-Oak (1982). Why quantifiers float. Paper presented to the Winter Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Kim, Alan Hyun-Oak (1988). Preverbal focusing and type XXIII languages. In Hammond, Michael et al. (eds.). Studies in Syntactic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud (1987). On the status of SVO sentences in French discourse. In Tomlin, Russell S. (ed.) Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 217–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang (1983). Word order and quantifier floating in Papago and Pima. Ms.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. (1975). A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru (1989). Structure and case marking in Japanese. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela (1984). Floating quantifiers in Pima. In Cook, Eung-Do & Gerdts, Donna B. (eds.) Syntax and semantics, vol. 16. New York: Academia Press. 269–287.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo (1989). Predication theory: a case study for indexing theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo (1992). Secondary resultative predicates in Italian. JL 28. 53–90. 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanches, Mary and Slobin, Linda (1973). Numeral classifiers and plural marking: an implicational universal. Working Papers on Language Universals 11. 1–22.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi (1978). Nihongo no bunseki. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Kageyama, Taro (1988). Word formation in a modular theory of grammar: postsyntactic compounds in Japanese. Lg 64. 451–484.Google Scholar
Sun, Chaofen (1988). The discourse function of numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 16. 298–322.Google Scholar
Takano, Yasukuni (1984). The lexical nature of quantifiers in Japanese. Linguistic Analysis 14. 289–311.Google Scholar
Terada, Michiko (1986). Unaccusativity and QPs in Japanese. Ms.Google Scholar
Terada, Michiko (1987). Unaccusativity in Japanese. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society. 619–640.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin (1980). Predication. Lin 11. 203–238.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin (1981). Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1. 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar