Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:34:43.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preverbal subjects, information structure, and object clitic position in Old Occitan1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2015

BRYAN DONALDSON
BRYAN DONALDSON*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
*
Author’s address: Department of Languages and Applied Linguistics, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USAbryandonaldson@ucsc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The position of object and adverbial clitics remains problematic in Old Occitan syntax (Wanner 2010). This paper analyzes clitic position specifically in affirmative main declaratives with overt preverbal subjects, in which clitics are either preverbal or postverbal with no apparent semantic distinction. Thus, the phrases En Constantiss’enanet and En Constantis anet s’en are semantically equivalent, each meaning ‘Sir Constantine left’, whether the clitics s’en ‘himself.from-there’ appear before or after the verb anet ‘went’. Previous analyses have concluded that this variation is random (Mériz 1978) or due to regional or dialectal variation (Hinzelin 2007). Neither approach satisfactorily addresses the underlying grammar or the principles underlying the distribution of the variants. The present analysis draws on claims about the left periphery in medieval Romance (Benincà 2006) and reports empirical data from the troubadour biographies (vidas and razos) and the vida of Saint Douceline. Results from 470 subject–verb declaratives establish that the subject in subject–verb–clitic sequences is left-dislocated, albeit covertly so. This sequence is one of several instantiations of subject left dislocation in Old Occitan and usually signals topic shift.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , 01 March 2016 , pp. 37 - 69
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Marianne. 1987. From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 5, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1997. Clitic left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation. In Anagnostopoulou, Elena, van Riemsdijk, Henk & Zwarts, Frans (eds.), Materials on left dislocation, 151–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglade, Joseph. 1921. Grammaire de l’ancien provenc¸al. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Ashby, William J. 1988. The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left- and right-dislocations in French. Lingua 75, 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bec, Pierre. 1963. La langue occitane. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 2006. A detailed map of the left periphery of medieval Romance. In Zanuttini, Rafaella, Campos, Héctor, Herburger, Elena & Portner, Paul H. (eds.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense, and clausal architecture, 53–86. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bocchi, Andrea. 2004. ‘Sì’ nel ‘Livero de l’abbecho’. In Zaccarello, Michelangelo & Tomasin, Lorenzo (eds.), Storia della lingua et filologia, 121–159. Florence: Sismel.Google Scholar
Bohnacker, Ute & Rosén, Christina. 2008. The clause-initial position in L2 German declaratives: Transfer of information structure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30, 511–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutière, Jean. 1964. Biographies des troubadours: Textes provenc¸aux des XIIIe et XIVe siècles. Paris: A.-G. Nizet.Google Scholar
Brunel, Clovis. 1926. Les plus anciennes chartes en langue provenc¸ale: Recueil des pièces originales antérieures au XIIIe siècle. Paris: Auguste Picard.Google Scholar
Brunel, Clovis. 1952. Les plus anciennes chartes en langue provenc¸ale: Recueil des pièces originales antérieures au XIIIe siècle – Supplément. Paris: Éditions A. & J. Picard.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2004. Towards a cartography of syntactic positions. In Rizzi, Luigi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, 115–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combettes, Bernard. 1971. Remarques sur la structure grammaticale et l’organisation thématique de la phrase dans les vies de troubadours. Actes du VIe Congrès International de Langue et Littérature d’Oc et d’Études Franco-Provenc¸ales, 293–308. Montpellier: Centre d’Estudis Occitans.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Bryan. 2012. Initial subordinate clauses in Old French: Syntactic variation and the clausal left periphery. Lingua 122, 1021–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bryan. To appear. Discourse functions of subject left dislocation in Old Occitan. Journal of Historical Pragmatics.Google Scholar
Ferraresi, Gisella & Goldbach, Maria. 2002. V2 syntax and topicalization in Old French. Linguistische Berichte 189, 2–25.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1964. On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1, 267–280.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1990. Tense and narrativity: From medieval performance to modern fiction. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1991. Discourse pragmatics and the grammar of Old French: A functional reinterpretation of siand the personal pronouns. Romance Philology 44, 251–283.Google Scholar
Fontana, Josep M. 1993. Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien. 1928. Petite syntaxe de l’ancien franc¸ais. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. Subjects, topics, and the interpretation of referential pro: An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25, 691–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Schwabe, Kerstin & Winkler, Susanne (eds.), On information structure, meaning, and form, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garay, Kathleen & Jeay, Madeleine. 2001. The life of Saint Douceline: Beguine of Provence. Rochester, NY: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gout, Raoul. 1927. La vie de Sainte Douceline. Paris: Ars et Fides.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and the composition of the left periphery: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, Frank R., Ricketts, Peter T. & Hathaway, John. 1967. Introduction à l’étude de l’ancien provenc¸al. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Henrichsen, Arne-Johan. 1955. Les phrases hypothétiques en ancien occitan: Etude syntaxique. Bergen: John Griegs.Google Scholar
Herman, Josef. 1954. Recherches sur l’ordre des mots dans les plus anciens textes franc¸ais en prose. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 4, 69–93, 351–379.Google Scholar
Hinzelin, Marc-Olivier. 2007. Die Stellung der klitischen Objektpronomina in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Hinzelin, Marc-Olivier. 2009. La position des pronoms clitiques en ancien occitan. In Latry, Guy (ed.), La voix occitane. Actes du VIIIe Congrès de l’Association Internationale d’Études Occitanes, 67–81. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax – theory and analysis: An international handbook, vol. 1, 342–383. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Frede. 1972. From Vulgar Latin to Old Provenc¸al. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede. 1986. The syntax of medieval Occitan. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Frede. 1994. Syntaxe de l’ancien occitan. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg. A. 2002. Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romansichen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunert, Hans P. 2003. L’ordine degli elementi della frase in Occitano antico. Romanische Forschungen 115, 194–209.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie. 2007. Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua 117, 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, Robert. 1967. La phrase occitane: Essai d’analyse systématique. Montpellier: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1981. Topic, antitopic, and verb agreement in non-standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. Dislocation. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf & Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language typology and language universals, 1050–1078. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2008. Satisfying V2 in early Romance: Merge vs. Move. Journal of Linguistics 44, 437–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2010. Subject licensing in CP: The Neapolitan double-subject construction. In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), 2010. Mapping the left periphery: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 5, 257–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemieux, Monique & Dupuis, Fernande. 1995. The locus of verb movement in non-asymmetric verb-second languages: The case of Middle French. In Battye, Adrian & Roberts, Ian G. (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 80–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane. 1985. Dire le vrai: L’adverbe “si” en franc¸ais médiéval – Essai de linguistique historique. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane. 1998. Dislocations en ancien franc¸ais: Thématisation ou rhématisation? Cahiers de praxématique 30, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, Eric. 2013. The left-periphery in Old French. In Arteaga, Deborah (ed.), Research on Old French: The state of the art, 327–350. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mériz, Diana T. 1978. Observations on object pronoun collocation with finite verb-parts in medieval Occitan (to 1300). Romania 99, 145–182, 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mussafia, Adolf. 1886. Una particolaritá sintattica della lingua italiana dei primi secoli. Miscellanea di folologica e linguistica: Dedicata alla memoria di Napoleone Caix e Ugo Angelo Canello, 255–261. Firenze: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Paden, William D. 1998. An introduction to Old Occitan. New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2005. Sìand $e$ as CP expletives in Old Italian. In Batllori, Montserrat, Hernanz, Maria-Lluı̈sa, Picallo, Carme & Roca, Francesc (eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric variation, 206–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey. 2006. Interpolation and the left periphery in Old Spanish. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 12–13, 188–216.Google Scholar
Posner, Rebecca. 1996. The Romance languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1997. On the functions of left-dislocation in English discourse. In Kamio, Akio (ed.), Directions in functional linguistics, 117–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsden, Herbert. 1963. Weak-pronoun position in the early Romance languages. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27, 53–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. 1993. Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. 2012. Phases, head movement and second-position effects. In Gallego, Ángel J. (ed.), Phases: Developing the framework, 385–440. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1970. From Vulgar Latin to Old French. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Romieu, Maurice & Bianchi, André. 2002a. Iniciacion a l’occitan ancian: Dètz e nòu tèxtes de l’Edat Mejana comentats. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Romieu, Maurice & Bianchi, André. 2002b. La lenga del trobar: Précis de grammatica d’occitan ancian. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain. 2004. Les clitiques pronominaux et la périphérie gauche en ancien franc¸ais. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 99, 181–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2000. La formazione del sistema V2 delle lingue romanze antiche. Lingua e stile 35, 665–692.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alexander H. 1938. Where were the Provenc¸al vidas and razos written? Modern Philology 35, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonenko, Alexandra & Hirschbühler, Paul. 2012. Placement de clitiques dans les propositions V1 et évolution de la structure de la proposition en ancien franc¸ais. In Dufresne, Monique (ed.), Typologie, ordre des mots et groupe verbal en franc¸ais médiéval, 11–53. Laval, Quebec: Presses de L’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2005. A corpus-based study of null subjects in Old French and Old Occitan. In Pusch, Claus D., Kabatek, Johannes & Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Romance corpus linguistics II: Corpora and diachronic linguistics, 359–374. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Skårup, Povl. 1975. Les premières zones de la proposition en ancien franc¸ais Revue Romane[special issue] 6.Google Scholar
Skårup, Povl. 1997. Morphologie élémentaire de l’ancien occitan. Copenhagen: Museum Tusulanums Forlag.Google Scholar
Smith, Nathaniel B. & Bergin, Thomas G.. 1984. An Old Provenc¸al primer. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Steiner, B. Devan. 2014. The evolution of information structure and verb second in the history of French. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Tobler, Adolf. 1875. Review of Jean J. Le Coultre, De l’ordre des mots dans Chrétien de Troyes, 1875. Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen34, 1057–1082.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1976. Sentence topic and discourse topic. Papers in Slavic Philology 1, 49–61.Google Scholar
van Reenen, Pieter & Schøsler, Lene. 1992. Ancien et moyen franc¸ais: si ‘thématique’. Analyse exhaustive d’une série de textes. Vox Romanica 51, 101–127.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara S. 1997. Syntactic change in medieval French: Verb-second and null subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Barbara S.2011. Variation and change in medieval Romance word order: The case of object clitics in Occitan. Presented at Language, Variation, and Change Workshop, The Univeristy of Chicago.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara S., Donaldson, Bryan & Steiner, B. Devan. 2010. V2 loss in Old French and Old Occitan: The role of fronted clauses. In Colina, Sonia, Olarrea, Antxon & Maria Carvalho, Ana (eds.), Romance linguistics 2009: Selected papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 301–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura, Renzi, Lorenzo & Benincà, Paola. 1985. Typologie des pronoms sujets dans les langues romanes. Actes du XVIIe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes 3, 163–176. Aix: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Wanner, Dieter. 2010. Review of M.-O. Hinzelin, Die Stellung der klitischen Objektpronomina in den romanischen Sprachen, 2007. Zeischrift für Katalanistik23, 270–280.Google Scholar