Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:58:05.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scandinavian gender agreement revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Olof Eriksson
Olof Eriksson
Affiliation:
Department of Romance languages, University of Göteborg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent article published in this journal (Faarlund, 1977), an attempt was made to account for the problem raised by the well-known fact that Scandinavian languages often use the neuter form of the predicative adjective in cases where the non-neuter form would seem to be called for by the ordinary rules of gender agreement.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 93 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beckman, N. (1904). Svensk spraklära. Stockholm: Bonnier.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1950). Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Eriksson, O. (1977). Ett svenskt kongruensproblem i fransk belysning. MSprak 71. 243–259.Google Scholar
Faarlund, J. T. (1977). Embedded clause reduction and Scandinavian gender agreement. JL 13. 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1968) (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1969) (1933). Essentials of English grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1969) (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S. (1970). Modern French ce. The neuter pronoun in adjectival predication. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandfeld, K. (1936). Syntaxe du français contemporain. Part 2: Les propositions subordonnées. Genéve: Droz.Google Scholar
Wellander, E. (1949). Predikatsfyllnadens form i modern svenska. Ett stycke sprakutveckling I ultrarapid närbild. Studier i modern sprakvetenskap 17. 179–209.Google Scholar
Widmark, G. (1966). Är färsk sill god eller gott? Sprakvard 2. 3–6.Google Scholar
Zandvoort, R. W. (1965) (1957). A handbook of English grammar. London: Longman.Google Scholar