Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-24T23:51:43.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should the passive transformation be obligatory?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Michael B. Kac
Michael B. Kac
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa 191094
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 1969 , pp. 145 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bach, E. (1964). An Introduction to Transformational Grammars. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kac, M. B. (forthcoming). Constituents, transformations and underlying structure.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Postal, P. M. (1964). An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar