Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-bcq64 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T01:27:05.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syllabic or non-syllabic phonology?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John Anderson
John Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of English Language, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh 8
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 1969 , pp. 136 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bauernschmidt, A. (1965). Amuzgo syllable dynamics. Lg 41. 471–483.Google Scholar
Bloch, B. (1958). Studies in colloquial Japanese, IV: Phonemics. In Joos (1958).Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. In Fodor & Katz (1964).Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1965). Some controversial questions in phonological theory. JL 1. 97–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J. (1964). The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Universals of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1964). Phonology in generative grammar. In Fodor & Katz (1964).Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1963 a). The tones of English. ArchL 15. 1–28.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1963 b). Intonation in English Grammar. TPhS 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbottom, E. (1964). Glottal reinforcement in English. TPhS 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1942). A Modern English Grammar, VI. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Joos, M. (1958). Readings in Linguistics. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1966 a). Is the syllable a phonological universal? JL 2. 207–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1966 b). Towards a phonological theory. Lingua 16. 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, H. (1964). A Phonology and Prosody of Modern English. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1966). Prolegomena to a theory of phonology. Lg 42. 536–573.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E. (1958). Korean phonemics. In Joos (1958).Google Scholar
Merrifield, W. (1963). Palantla Chinantex syllable types. AnL 5:5. 1–16.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1955). Language in Relation to a Unified Structure of Human Behavior, II. Glendale, Calif.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Šaumjan, S. K. (1967). Phonology and generative grammars. In To Honor Roman Jakobson, 1734–1744. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar