Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:14:09.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Typological approaches to the passive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Paul Kent Andersen
Paul Kent Andersen
Affiliation:
University of Bielefeld
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 189 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Masayoshi, Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice. (Typological Studies in Language 16.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1988. Pp. xi + 706.Google Scholar

REFERENCES

Andersen, P. K. (1986a). Die -ta-Partizipialkonstruktion bei Aśoka: Passiv oder Ergativ? KZ 99. 75–94.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. K. (1986b). The genitive agent in Rigvedic passive constructions. Collectanea linguistica in Honorem Adami Heinz. Prace Komisji Jezykoznawstwa 53. 9–13.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. K. (1987). Zero-anaphora and related phenomena in Classical Tibetan. Studies in Language 11. 281–324.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. K. (1989). Gibt es Passivmorphologie? Linguistische Berichte 121. 185–205.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. K. (In press (a)). Arguments against the passive as a universal morphological category. To appear in Morphologica 1988.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. K. (In press (b)). Remarks on the origin of the term ‘passive’. To appear in Lingua.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. K. (In preparation). An investigation of the passive with special reference to Classical Greek.Google Scholar
Beedham, Ch. (1982). The passive aspect in English, German and Russian. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology. A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foley, W. A.Van Valin, R. D. Jr. (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gonda, J. (1951). Remarks on the Sanskrit passive. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1987). Transitivity alterations of the anticausative type. Arbeitspapier Nr. 5, Neue Folge, Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Köln.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1989). The grammaticization of passive morphology. Ms. [To appear in Studies in Language].Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. (1985). Passive in the world's languages. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1. 243–281.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. (1898). Ausführliche Grammatik der Griechischen Sprache. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. & Munro, P. (1975). Passives and their meaning. Lg 51. 789–830.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, V. P. & Jaxontov, S. Je. (1988). The typology of resultative constructions. In Nedjalkov, V. P. (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions. Typological Studies in Language 12. English translation edited by B. Comrie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. & Postal, P. M. (1983). Toward a universal characterization of passivization. In Perlmutter, D. M. (ed.) Studies in Relational Grammar 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 3–29.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, D. (1984). Studien zu Syntax und Semantik des Verbs BLEIBEN under besonderer Berücksichtigung des Niederdeutschen und Niederländischen. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Schiefer, E. (1983). Überlegungen zur Tauglichkeit des Passivbegriffs und bischeriger Passivuntersuchungen, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung finnisch-ugrischer Sprachen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. (1985). Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis. Lg 61. 821–848.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. (1984). The passive. A comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Speijer, J. S. (1886). Sanskrit syntax. Leyden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, J. (1950). Vorlesungen über Syntax mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch. Erste Reihe. Zweite Auflage. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar