Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:31:37.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Profiting from collaborative innovation practices: Identifying organizational success factors along the process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2018

Paula Anzola-Román ,
Cristina Bayona-Sáez  and
Teresa García-Marco
Paula Anzola-Román*
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Research in Business and Economics – INARBE, Public University of Navarre, Campus de Arrosadía, 31006, Pamplona, Spain
Cristina Bayona-Sáez
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Research in Business and Economics – INARBE, Public University of Navarre, Campus de Arrosadía, 31006, Pamplona, Spain
Teresa García-Marco
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Research in Business and Economics – INARBE, Public University of Navarre, Campus de Arrosadía, 31006, Pamplona, Spain
*
Corresponding author: paula.anzola@unavarra.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on innovation management has pointed out that the capitalization of collaborative innovation practices is influenced by firms’ internal context. This paper aims to answer the following question: which organizational factors help to overcome the challenges that firms face in the different phases of the collaborative innovation process? For this purpose, previous literature is revised and three case studies are analyzed by means of applying a framework that structures the collaborative innovation process in three areas of relevance (i.e., development, integration and commercialization of the innovation). The results of the analysis inform the proposal of a theoretical framework that identifies the organizational context factors that determine the success or failure of collaborative innovation practices in each of the stages of the process.

Keywords

collaborative innovationcase studiesinnovation processinternal contextorganizational context
Type
Case study
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 239 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in E-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520.Google Scholar
Barge-Gil, A. (2010). Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: An empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior. Technovation, 30(3), 195–206.Google Scholar
Bayona, C., García-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2001). Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy, 30(8), 1289–1307.Google Scholar
Bayona, C., García-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2004). Links between the characteristics of alliances and the applicability of research results. Management Research, 15, 215–236.Google Scholar
Belderbos, R., Faems, D., Leten, B., & van Looy, B. (2010). Technological activities and their impact on the financial performance of the firm: Exploitation and exploration within and between firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 869–882.Google Scholar
Bosch, F., Volberda, H. W., & de Boer, M. (2009). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capacities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551–568.Google Scholar
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks: A proximity perspective. In R., Boschma, & R., Martin (Eds.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Wilkinson, T. J. (1995). Strategic alliances: Choose your partners. Long Range Planning, 28(3), 18–25.Google Scholar
Burcharth, A. L. A., Knudsen, M. P., & Søndergaard, H. A. (2013). Using internal coupling activities to enhance the effectiveness of open innovation. Paper presented at the 35th DRUID Conference, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.Google Scholar
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709.Google Scholar
Dewangan, V., & Godse, M. (2014). Towards a holistic enterprise innovation performance measurement system. Technovation, 34(9), 536–545.Google Scholar
Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. (2006). The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Management, 36(3), 333–346.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.Google Scholar
Faems, D., de Visser, M., Andries, P., & Van Looy, B. (2010). Technology alliance portfolios and financial performance: Value-enhancing and cost-increasing effects of open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 785–796.Google Scholar
Fabrizio, K. R. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38(2), 255–267.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., Laursen, K., & Pedersen, T. (2011). Linking customer interaction and innovation: The mediating role of new organizational practices. Organization Science, 22(4), 980–999.Google Scholar
Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation (2nd ed., London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Galende, J., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behavior. Research Policy, 32(5), 715–736.Google Scholar
García-Martínez, M., Zouaghi, F., & Sánchez-García, M. (2016). Capturing value from alliance portfolio diversity: The mediating role of R&D Human Capital in high and low tech industries. Technovation, 59, 55–67.Google Scholar
Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. Paper presented at RADMA Conference, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 91–112.Google Scholar
Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1465–1474.Google Scholar
Gold, A., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.Google Scholar
Grimpe, C., & Sofka, W. (2009). Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low- and high-technology sectors in European countries. Research Policy, 38(3), 495–506.Google Scholar
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Herriot, R. E., & Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability. Educational Researcher, 12(2), 14–19.Google Scholar
Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2–9.Google Scholar
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611.Google Scholar
Johne, F. A., & Snelson, P. A. (1988). Success factors in product innovation: A selective review of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(2), 114–128.Google Scholar
Kang, K. H., & Kang, J. (2009). How do firms source external knowledge for innovation? Analyzing effects of different knowledge sourcing methods. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the not-invented-here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 12, 7–19.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (1997). The dynamics of Samsung’s technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Review, 39(3), 86–100.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2001). The dynamics of technological learning in industrialization. International Social Science Journal, 53(168), 297–308.Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, R. (2005). Open innovation in practice. Research Technology Management, 48(4), 24–28.Google Scholar
Kumar, N., Scheer, L., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1633–1651.Google Scholar
Langfield-Smith, K., & Greenwood, M. (1998). Developing cooperative buyer-supplier relationships: A case study of Toyota. Journal of Management Studies, 35(3), 332–353.Google Scholar
Lau, A. K. W. (2011). Supplier and customer involvement on new product performance: Contextual factors and an empirical test from manufacturer perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(6), 910–942.Google Scholar
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.Google Scholar
Lazzarotti, V., & Manzini, R. (2009). Different modes of open innovation: A theoretical framework and an empirical study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 615–636.Google Scholar
Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., Nosella, A., & Pellegrini, L. (2016). Collaborations with scientific partners: The mediating role of the social context in fostering innovation performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 142–156.Google Scholar
Lehmberg, D. (2017). The process of industry exit in the Japanese context: Evidence from the flat panel display industry. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(1), 92–115.Google Scholar
Leonard, D. A. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Mattes, J. (2012). Dimensions of proximity and knowledge bases: Innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1085–1099.Google Scholar
Mazzola, E., Bruccoleri, M., & Perrone, G. (2012). The effect of inbound, outbound and coupled innovation on performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(6), 1–27.Google Scholar
Montoro-Sánchez, A., & Mora-Valentín, E. M. (2006). Hacia una gestión eficaz de las relaciones entre empresas y universidades. Universia Business Review, 10, 38–53.Google Scholar
Mora-Valentín, E. M., Montoro-Sánchez, A., & Guerras-Martín, L. A. (2004). Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organisms. Research Policy, 33, 17–40.Google Scholar
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735.Google Scholar
Nagano, M. S., Stefanovitz, J. P., & Vick, T. E. (2014). Innovation management processes, their internal organizational elements and contextual factors: An investigation in Brazil. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33, 63–92.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B. (2003). Elements of a cognitive theory of the firm (CentER Discussion Paper No. 2005-46), Tilburg.Google Scholar
Nystrom, P. C., Ramamurthy, K., & Wilson, A. L. (2002). Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: Adoption of imaging technology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19(3–4), 221–247.Google Scholar
Pichlak, M. (2016). The innovation adoption process s: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(4), 476–494.Google Scholar
Porter, L. W., & McLaughlin, G. B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 559–576.Google Scholar
Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759–780.Google Scholar
Segarra-Ciprés, M., Roca-Puig, V., & Bou-Llusar, J. C. (2014). External knowledge acquisition and innovation output: An analysis of the moderating effect of internal knowledge transfer. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(2), 203–214.Google Scholar
Schiele, H. (2010). Early supplier integration: The dual role of purchasing in new product development. R&D Management, 40(2), 138–153.Google Scholar
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388.Google Scholar
Schoenmakers, W., & Duysters, G. (2006). Learning in strategic technology alliances. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1(2), 245–264.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Gilbert, D., & Sutherland, F. (2017). The explore-exploit tension: A case study of organizing in a professional services firm. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(4), 566–586.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43, 172–194.Google Scholar
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. R. (2010). Co-operative ties and innovation: Some new evidence for UK manufacturing. Research Policy, 39(6), 762–775.Google Scholar
Urgal, B., Quintás, M. A., & Tomé, R. A. (2011). Technological knowledge, innovation capability and innovative performance: The moderating role of the behavioural environment of the firm. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de Empresas, 14(1), 53–66.Google Scholar
Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., & Manjarrés-Henríquez, L. (2008). The effect of external and internal factors on firms’ product innovation. Research Policy, 37(4), 616–632.Google Scholar
West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831.Google Scholar
Witzeman, S., Slowinski, G., Dirkx, R., Gollob, L., Tao, J., Ward, S., & Miraglia, S. (2006). Harnessing external technology for innovation. Research-Technology Management, 49(3), 19–27.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar