Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-28T22:33:40.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of supervisory behavior, job satisfaction and organizational commitment on employee turnover

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2015

Cynthia Mathieu ,
Bruno Fabi ,
Richard Lacoursière  and
Louis Raymond
Cynthia Mathieu*
Affiliation:
Business Department, Institute for Research on SMEs, Universite du Quebec a Trois-Rivieres, QC, Canada
Bruno Fabi
Affiliation:
Business Department, Institute for Research on SMEs, Universite du Quebec a Trois-Rivieres, QC, Canada
Richard Lacoursière
Affiliation:
Business Department, Institute for Research on SMEs, Universite du Quebec a Trois-Rivieres, QC, Canada
Louis Raymond
Affiliation:
Business Department, Institute for Research on SMEs, Universite du Quebec a Trois-Rivieres, QC, Canada
*
Corresponding author: cynthia.mathieu@uqtr.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Few studies have presented structural turnover models including both job satisfaction and organizational commitment measures. Recent research suggests that perceived supervisor leadership may contribute to employee well-being, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. This study proposes a structural turnover intention model including supervisory behavior (person-oriented and task-oriented dimensions), job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Furthermore, the study proposes to test whether this model fits in both small- and medium-sized enterprises and in large enterprises. The sample included 763 employees from different types of organizations who have completed a measure of their perception of their supervisor’s behavior and self-administrated measures of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intention. Results show that person-oriented leadership behavior affects turnover intentions through job satisfaction and organizational commitment more than task-oriented leadership behavior. Only organizational commitment had a direct effect in explaining turnover intention. Finally, results indicate that the model is applicable both in small- and medium-sized enterprises and large enterprises.

Keywords

leadershipsupervisory behaviorturnover intentionsjob satisfactionorganizational commitment
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 113 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Third edition manual and sampler set. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
Bateman, T. S., & Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 95–112.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. N., Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Wayne, S. J. (2006). A longitudinal study of the moderating role of extraversion: Leader-member exchange, performance, and turnover during new executive development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 298–310.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentein, K., Vanderberg, R., Vanderberghe, C., & Stinglhamber, F. (2005). The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 468–482.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1980). Linear structural equations with latent variables. Psychometrika, 45, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C., Pearce, C. L., Justin, J. E., & Stovall, J. F. (2007). When the romance is over: Follower perspectives of aversive leadership. Applied Psychology, 56(4), 528–557.Google Scholar
Bono, J. E., Foldes, H. J., Vinson, G., & Muros, J. P. (2007). Workplace emotions: The role of supervision and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1357–1367.Google Scholar
Brannick, M. T., Chan, D., Conway, J. M., Lance, C. E., & Spector, P. E. (2010). What is method variance and how can we cope with it? A panel discussion. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 407–420.Google Scholar
Buckingham, M., & Vosburgh, R. M. (2001). The 21st century human resources function: It’s the talent, stupid! Human Resource Planning, 24(4), 17–23.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D. G., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler, P. H. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change (pp. 71–138). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cheung, M. F. Y., Wu, W.-P., Chan, A. K. K., & Wong, M. M. L. (2009). Supervisor-subordinate guanxi and employee work outcomes: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinomona, R., & Chinomona, E. (2013). The influence of employees' perceptions of organizational politics on turnover intentions in Zimbabwe's SME sector. South African Journal of Business Management, 44(2), 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business & Psychology, 25, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Coninck, J. B. (2011). The effects of leader-member exchange and organizational identification on performance and turnover among sales people. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 31(1), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263–282.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., & Lynch, P. D. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42–51.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 812–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vanderberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565–573.Google Scholar
Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structure equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
Geringer, J. M., Frayne, C. A., & Milliman., J. F. (2002). In search of ‘best practices’ in international human resource management: Research design and methodology. Human Resource Management, 41(1), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbreath, B. (2004). Creating healthy workplaces: The Supervisor’s role. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 19, 102–127.Google Scholar
Gilbreath, B., & Benson, P. G. (2004). The contribution of supervisor behaviour to employee psychological well-being. Work & Stress, 18(3), 255–266.Google Scholar
Glebbeek, A. C., & Bax, E. H. (2004). Is high employee turnover really harmful? An empirical test using company records. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 277–286.Google Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Mary Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational Psychological Measurement (Vol. 66, pp. 930–944).Google Scholar
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.Google Scholar
Hackett, R. D., Lapierre, L. M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (2001). Understanding the links between work commitment constructs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 392–413.Google Scholar
Han, G. H., & Jekel, M. (2011). The mediating role of job satisfaction between leader-member exchange and turnover intentions. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(1), 41–49.Google Scholar
Hellman, C. (1997). Job satisfaction and intent to leave. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 677–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkin, T. R., & Tracey, J. B. (2000). The cost of turnover: Putting a price on the learning curve. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41, 14–21.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1), 40–51.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2005). What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, R., & Warrenfeltz, R. (2003). Educating the modern manager. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(1), 74–84.Google Scholar
Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Eberly, M. B. (2008). Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 231–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, D., Ng, K.-Y., Koh, C., & Soon, A. (2007). Turnover of information technology professionals: A narrative review, meta-analytic structural equation modeling, and model development. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 547–577.Google Scholar
Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Wanberg, C. R. (2003). Unwrapping the organizational entry process: Disentangling multiple antecedents and their pathways to adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 779–794.Google Scholar
Kim, B. P., Lee, G., & Carlson, K. (2010). The nature of the relationship between Leader-Member-Exchange (LMX) and turnover intent at different organizational levels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 591–597.Google Scholar
Kim, S. (2002). Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, E. A. (2000). The prime movers: Traits of the great wealth creators. New York: AMACOM.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 710–730.Google Scholar
Maertz, C. P. Jr., Griffeth, R. W., Campbell, N. S., & Allen, D. G. (2007). The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1059–1075.Google Scholar
Martin, B. J. (1990). A successful approach to absenteeism. Nursing Management, 21, 45–48.Google Scholar
Martin, R., Thomas, G., Charles, K., Epitropaki, O., & McNamara, R. (2005). The role of leader-member exchanges in mediating the relationship between locus of control and work reactions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 19(1), 141–147.Google Scholar
McCarthy, G., Tyrrell, M. P., & Lehane, E. (2007). Intention to ‘leave’ or ‘stay’ in nursing. Journal of Nursing Management, 15(3), 248–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538–551.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Smith, C. A. (2000). HRM practices and organizational commitment: Test of a mediation model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miner, A. G., Glomb, T. M., & Hulin, C. (2005). Experience sampling mood and its correlates at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(2), 171–193.Google Scholar
Petter, S., Straub, D. W., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.Google Scholar
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2004). Expecting sales growth, CEOs cite worker retention as critical to success, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Delaware, March 15.Google Scholar
Rad, A. M. M., & Yarmohammadian, M. H. (2006). A study of relationship between manager’s leadership style and employees’ job satisfaction. Leadership in Health Services, 19(2), 11–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of App lied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.Google Scholar
Robert, N., & Thatcher, J. B. (2009). Conceptualizing and testing formative constructs: Tutorial and annotated example. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 40(3), 9–39.Google Scholar
Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Leader–member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Steel, R. P., & Ovale, N. K. (1984). A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioural intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 673–686.Google Scholar
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education (Vol. 2, pp. 53–55).Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–293.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, C., Bentein, K., & Stinglhamber, F. (2004). Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 47–71.Google Scholar
Wagner, C. M. (2007). Organizational commitment as a predictor variable in nursing turnover research: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 235–347.Google Scholar
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7, 418–428.Google Scholar
Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Logquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire (Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, No. 22). Minneapolis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462.Google Scholar
Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A re-analysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 219–233.Google Scholar