Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:45:13.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategic Choices and Business Performance: An Empirical Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Bishnu Sharma  and
Tom Fisher
Bishnu Sharma
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC Qld 4558, Tel: 61 7 5430 2854, Fax: 61 7 5430 1210, Email: bsharma@usc.edu.au
Tom Fisher
Affiliation:
School of Management, University of Technology, Sydney, Tel: 61 2 9514 3620, Fax: 61 2 9514 3602 Email: tfisher@uts.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper reports research within Australian manufacturing companies that investigated the perceived importance and interrelationships of functional and business strategies. Seven functional strategies were postulated (operations, research and development, technology, marketing, human resources, organisational, and financial). Porter's (1980) generic strategies were used to define business strategies because of their ability to simplify complex strategic patterns and because of their popularity in the strategic management literature (Miller and Dess, 1993). The research found that Australian manufacturers operations strategy was the most preferred and effective functional strategy. Australian manufacturers also have a preference for combined generic strategies. However, an analysis of performance suggests that the adoption of a single generic strategy may be preferable.

Keywords

• Generic strategies• Functional strategies• Operations strategy• Competitiveness
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , March 1999 , pp. 17 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Manufacturing Council (1990) The Global Challenge, Australian Manufacturing in the 1990s MelbourneGoogle Scholar
Australian Manufacturing Council (1993) Emerging Exporters, Australia's High Value Added Manufacturing Exporters MelbourneGoogle Scholar
Australian Manufacturing Council (1994a) Leading The Way: A Study of Best Manufacturing Practices in Australia and New Zealand MelbourneGoogle Scholar
Australian Manufacturing Council (1994b) The Wealth of Ideas, How Linkages Help Sustain Innovation and Growth MelbourneGoogle Scholar
Anderson, CR and Zeithaml, CP (1984) ‘Stage of the Product Life Cycle, Business Strategy, and Business Performance’ Academy Of Management Journal Vol 2 No 1 pp 5–24Google Scholar
Andrews, KR (1971) The Concept of Corporate Strategy New York: Dow-Jones IrwinGoogle Scholar
Ansoff, HI (1965) Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion New York: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
Bureau Of Industry Economics (1986) Manufacturing Industry Productivity Growth: Causes, Effects and Implications Research Report 21 CanberraGoogle Scholar
Bititci, U S (1994) ‘Measuring Your Way to Profit’ Management Decision Vol 32 No 6 pp 16–24Google Scholar
Corsten, H and Will, T (1993/94) ‘Reflections on Competitive Strategy and its Impact on Modern Concepts’ Management International Review Special Issue pp 315–334Google Scholar
Dess, GG and Davis, PS (1984) ‘Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organisational Performance’ Academy Of Management Journal Vol 27 No 3 pp 467–488Google Scholar
Dess, GG and Robinson, RB (1984), Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately Held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit; Strategic Management Journal, Vol 5 pp 265–273Google Scholar
Fisher, TJ (1991) ‘The Impact of Quality Management on Productivity’ Paper Presented at the Asia Pacific Quality Control Organisation Conference Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Fox, HW (1973) ‘A Framework for Functional Coordination’ Atlanta Economic Review 11-Dec pp 8–11Google Scholar
Glueck, WF (1980) Business Policy and Strategic Management New York: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
Gold, B (1993) ‘Productivity, R&D and International Competitiveness’ International Journal of Technohgy Management Vol 8 No 2 pp 4–17Google Scholar
Golden, BR (1992) ‘SBU Strategy And Performance: The Moderating Effects of the Corporate-SBU Relationship’ Strategic Management Journal Vol 13 No 2 pp 145–158Google Scholar
Gopinath, G and Hoffman, RC (1995) ‘The Relevance of Strategy Research: Practitioner and Academic Viewpoints’ Journal of Management Studies Vol 32 No 5 pp 575–594Google Scholar
Hambrick, DC and Mason, PA (1984) ‘Upper Echelons: The Organisation as a Reflection of its Top Managers’ Academy of Management Review Vol 9 No 2 pp 193–206Google Scholar
Hill, CWL (1988) ‘Differentiation Versus Low Cost or Differentiation and Low Cost: A Contingency Framework’ Academy Of Management Review Vol 13 No 3 pp 401–412Google Scholar
Hilmer, FG (1991) Coming to Grips with Competitiveness and Productivity Discussion Paper 91/01 Economic Planning Advisory Council (EPAC) Canberra: AGPSGoogle Scholar
Hitt, MA and Ireland, RD (1985a) ‘Corporate Distinctive Competence, Strategy, Industry and Performance’ Strategic Management Journal Vol 6 pp 273–293Google Scholar
Hitt, MA and Ireland, RD (1985b) ‘Strategy, Contextual Factors, and Performance’ Human Relations Vol 38 No 8 pp 793–812Google Scholar
Hitt, MA, Ireland, RD and Palia, K.A (1982) ‘Industrial Firms' Grand Strategy and Functional Importance: Moderating Effects of Technology and Uncertainty’ Academy of Management Journal Vol 25 No 2 pp 265–298Google Scholar
Hrebiniak, LG (1990) ‘Implementing Strategy’ Chief Executive 04 pp 74–77Google Scholar
Hrebiniak, LG and Snow, CS (1980) ‘Industry Differences in Environmental Uncertainty and Organisational Characteristics Related to Uncertainty’ Academy of Management Journal, Vol 23 No 4 pp 750–758Google Scholar
Karpin Report (1995) Enterprising Nation, Renewing Australia's Managers yo Meet the Challenges of the Asia-Pacific Century; Report of the Industry Task Force on Leadership and Management Skills Executive Summary Canberra: AGPSGoogle Scholar
Koch, MJ and McGrath, RG (1996) ‘Improving Labour Productivity: Human Resource Management Policies do Matter’ Strategic Management Journal Vol 17 pp 335–354Google Scholar
Kotha, S and Vadlamani, BL (1995) ‘Assessing Generic Strategies: An Empirical Investigation of Two Competing Typologies in Discrete Manufacturing Industries’ Strategic Management Journal Vol 16 pp 75–83Google Scholar
KPMG Peat Marwick (1993) Manufacturing Survey MelbourneGoogle Scholar
McDougall, PP, Covin, JG, Robinson, RB and Herron, L (1994) ‘The Effects of Industry Growth and Strategic Breadth on New Venture Performance and Strategy Content’ Strategic Management Journal Vol 15 pp 537–554Google Scholar
Miles, RE, Snow, CC, Meyer, AD and Coleman, HJ (1978) Organisational Strategy, Structure and Process New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Miller, D and Friesen, PH (1986) ‘Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies and Performance: An Empirical Examination with American Data, Part I: Testing Porter’ Organisation Studies, Vol 7 No 1 pp 37–55Google Scholar
Miller, A and Dess, GG (1993) ‘Assessing Porter's (1980) Model in Terms of its Generalizabihty, Accuracy and Simplicity’ Journal of Management Studies Vol 30 No 4 pp 553–585Google Scholar
Pohl, HH (1973) ‘The Coming Era of the Financial Executive: A Broadened, Less Specialised Role’ Business Horizons Vol 16 06 pp 15–22Google Scholar
Porter, ME (1980) Competitive Strategy New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Porter, ME (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Porter, ME (1991) ‘Towards A Dynamic Theory of Strategy’ Strategic Management Journal Vol 12 pp 95–117Google Scholar
Ramsay, MR (1995) Enterprise Productivity Measurement and International Labor Productivity Year Book Research carried out by the RIPER Foundation with the support of the International Labor Organisation (ILO) GenevaGoogle Scholar
Rumelt, R (1974) Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance Division of Research, Harvard Business School BostonGoogle Scholar
Sharma, B (1997) ‘Strategies for Competitiveness in the Australian Manufacturing Industry’ Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation University of Technology SydneyGoogle Scholar
Sharma, B and Fisher, T (1997) ‘Functional Strategies and Competitiveness: An Empirical Analysis using Data from Australian Manufacturing’ Benchmarking for Quality Management and Technology: An International Journal Vol 4 No 4 pp 286–294Google Scholar
Snow, CC and Hrebiniak, LG (1980) ‘Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organisational Performance’ Administrative Science Quarterly Vol 25 06 pp 317–336Google Scholar
Steiner, G (1969) Strategic Factors in Business Success New York: Financial Executives' Research FoundationGoogle Scholar
Steiner, GA and Miner, JB (1977) Management Policy and Strategy: Text, Readings, and Cases New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Swamidas, PM and Newell, WT (1987) ‘Manufacturing Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Performance: A Path Analytical Model’ Management Science Vol 33 No 4 pp 509–524Google Scholar
Vecchio, RP, Hearn, G and Southey, G (1992) Organisational Behaviour: Life at Work in Australia; Sydney: Harcourt Brace and JovanovichGoogle Scholar
White, RE (1986) ‘Generic Business Strategies, Organisational Context and Performance: An Empirical Investigation’ Strategic Management Journal Vol 7 pp 217–231Google Scholar
Woo, CY (1983) ‘Evaluation of the Strategies and Performance of Low Market Share Leaders’ Strategic Management Journal Vol 4 pp 123–135Google Scholar
Zahra, SA and Covin, JG (1993) ‘Business Strategy, Technology Policy and Firm Performance’ Strategic Management Journal Vol 14 pp 451–478Google Scholar
Zajac, EJ and Shortell, SM (1989) ‘Changing Strategies: Likelihood, Direction, and Performance Implications’ Strategic Management Journal Vol 10 pp 413–430Google Scholar