Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:32:12.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commercializing LanzaTech, from waste to fuel: An effectuation case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2018

Brian Karlson ,
Cristiano Bellavitis  and
Nadine France
Brian Karlson
Affiliation:
Management and International Business, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Cristiano Bellavitis*
Affiliation:
Management and International Business, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Nadine France
Affiliation:
Management and International Business, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
*
Corresponding author: c.bellavitis@auckland.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This case describes the extraordinary growth story of LanzaTech, a New Zealand (NZ)-based company cofounded in 2005 by scientists Sean Simpson and Richard Forster. LanzaTech developed a microbe which fermented the waste gases generated from steel manufacturing to produce ethanol and other chemicals. This case builds on effectuation logic and entrepreneurial discovery to highlight the challenges and opportunities of research commercialization. The case is structured chronologically and outlines the steps that the entrepreneur has taken to build the technology from scratch. It covers the early phases of the company, focussing particularly on how LanzaTech developed, refined, patented and began to commercialize its research. A key strength of the case is its multidisciplinary focus. The case describes some of the crucial aspects of research commercialization including capital raising, developing a business model, forming partnerships and expanding internationally. The case also describes a company committed to retaining its research base in NZ, and some of the opportunities and drawbacks of operating in a small economy at a distance from key market players.

Keywords

joint venturesNew Zealandentrepreneurshipinnovationinternational new venture
Type
Case Study
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 175 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellavitis, C., Filatotchev, I., & Kamuriwo, D. S. (2014). The effects of intra‐industry and extra‐industry networks on performance: A case of venture capital portfolio firms. Managerial and Decision Economics, 35(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellavitis, C., Filatotchev, I., Kamuriwo, D. S., & Vanacker, T. (2017). Entrepreneurial finance: New frontiers of research and practice: Editorial for the special issue embracing entrepreneurial funding innovations. Venture Capital, 19(1–2), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellavitis, C., Filatotchev, I., & Souitaris, V. (2017). The impact of investment networks on venture capital firm performance: A contingency framework. British Journal of Management, 28, 102–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellavitis, C., Kamuriwo, D. S., & Hommel, U. (2018). Mitigation of moral hazard and adverse selection in venture capital financing: The influence of the country’s institutional setting. Journal of Small Business Management, doi:10.1111/jsbm.12391.Google Scholar
Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72.Google Scholar
Cumming, D. J., & MacIntosh, J. G. (2003). A cross-country comparison of full and partial venture capital exits. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(3), 511–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, B. (2006). China’s Renewal. US News and World Report, 140(22), 37–40.Google Scholar
Javidan, M. (1998). Core competence: What does it mean in practice? Long Range Planning, 31(1), 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlson, B., France, N., & Bellavitis, C. (2017). PowerbyProxi connecting the unknown dots in the commercialisation of inductive power transfer. Case Studies in Business and Management, 4(2), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollmer, H., & Dowling, M. (2004). Licensing as a commercialisation strategy for new technology-based firms. Research Policy, 33(8), 1141–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moogk, D. R. (2012). Minimum viable product and the importance of experimentation in technology startups. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(3), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Venture Capital Association (NZVCA) (2008). Fuel for your business: An entrepreneur’s guide to angel and venture capital funding, NZVCA.Google Scholar
Read, S., Sarasvathy, S., Dew, N., Wiltbank, R., & Ohlsson, A. V. (2011). Effectual Entrepreneurship. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sapienza, H. J., Manigart, S., & Vermeir, W. (1996). Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(6), 439–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J. (1988). Capturing value from technological innovation: Integration, strategic partnering, and licensing decisions. Interfaces, 18(3), 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar