Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:44:15.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Entrepreneurship Research: Follow the Yellow-Brick Road?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Patricia Doyle Corner  and
Kathryn Pavlovich
Patricia Doyle Corner
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
Kathryn Pavlovich
Affiliation:
Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , November 2007 , pp. 288 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2007

References

Acs, Z & Audretsch, D (1990) Small firm entry in US manufacturing, Económica, 56: 255–266.Google Scholar
Alvarez, SA and Barney, J (2005) Discovery and Creation: Implications for practice and policy. Paper presented at the 2005 Enterprise and Innovation Research Conference, Waikato Stadium: Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Bygrave, W (2004) ‘The entrepreneurial process’ In Bygrave, W and Zarcharakis, A (Eds) The Portable MBA in Entrepreneurship, 3rd edn. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons (pp 1–28).Google Scholar
Burgelman, R and Sayles, L (1986) Inside corporate innovation: Strategy, structure, and managerial skills. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Chan, D (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 234–246.Google Scholar
Chen, G, Mathieu, J and Bliese, P (2004) ‘A framework for conducting multilevel construct validation’ in Yammarino, F and Dansereau, F (Eds) Research in multi-level issues 3: 273–303London, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cohen, WM and Levinthal, DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.Google Scholar
Cope, J (2005) Researching entrepreneurship through phenomenological inquiry: Philosophical and methodological issues. International Small Business Journal 23: 163–189.Google Scholar
Corner, P and Pavlovich, K (2005) Collective Entrepreneurship: Construct Definition and Development. Proceedings of the AGSE (Entrepreneurship Research Exchange), Auckland: Unitec.Google Scholar
Coviello, N and Jones, M (2004) Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing 19: 485–508.Google Scholar
Davidsson, P, Low, M, Wright, M (2001) Editor's introduction: Low and MacMillan ten years on: Achievements and future directions for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Summer, 5–15.Google Scholar
Dess, G, Lumpkin, G and Covin, J (1997) Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance:Tests of contingency and configuration models. Strategic Management Journal 18: 677–695.Google Scholar
Grant, R and Baden-Fuller, C (2004) A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies 41: 61–85.Google Scholar
Hannan, M and Freeman, J (1987) The ecology of organizational founding: American labor unions, 1836-1975. American Journal of Sociology 92: 910–943.Google Scholar
Hill, J and McGowan, P (1999) Small business and enterprise development: questions about research methodology. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Research 5: 5–13.Google Scholar
Huse, M and Landstrom, H (1997) European entrepreneurship and small business research: methodological openness and contextual differences. International Studies of Management and Organizations 27 (Fall): 3–12.Google Scholar
Khilstrom, R and Laffont, J (1979) A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy 87: 719–748.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I (1997) Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian Approach, Journal of Economic Literature XXXXV (1) March: 60–85.Google Scholar
Klein, K and Koslowski, S (2000) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
Koslowski, SWJ and Klein, K (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes’ in Klein, K and Koslowski, SWJ (Eds) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions pp 3–90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lant, TK and Mezias, SJ (1992) An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organization Science 3: 47–72.Google Scholar
Lubatkin, M, Florin, J and Lane, P (2001) Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning. Human Relations 54(10): 1353–1382.Google Scholar
McClelland, D (1961) The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Norstrand.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R, Busenitz, L, Bird, B, Gaglio, C, McMullen, J, Morse, E and Smith, JB (2007) The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research 2007. Entrepreneurship, Theory, and Practice 31: 1–27.Google Scholar
Pavlovich, K and Corner, P (2006) Knowledge Creation Through Co-Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies 1: 178–196.Google Scholar
Reynolds, P, Bygrave, W, Autio, E and Hay, M (2002) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor—2002 Summary Report available at http://www.gemconsortium.org.Google Scholar
Schere, J (1982) Tolerance of ambiguity as a discriminating variable between entrepreneurs and managers. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings 42: 404–408.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J (1976) The process of creative destruction, in Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Chapter, VII, London: George Allen & Unwin, pp 81–86.Google Scholar
Shane, S and Venkataraman, S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research, Academy of Management Review 25: 217–226.Google Scholar
Shane, S (2002) Introduction. The Foundations of Entrepreneurship: Volume 1. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shane, S (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shepherd, DA (2003) Learning from business failure: propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Academy of Management Review 28(2): 318–328.Google Scholar
Simsek, Z and Lubatkin, M (2003) Toward a knowledge-based view of entrepreneurial initiatives and performance. Working Paper, School of Business: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Spender, JC (1996) Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management 9: 63–79.Google Scholar
Spender, J-C and Grant, R (1996) Knowledge and the firm: An overview. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Special Issue): 5–10.Google Scholar
Tushman, M and Anderson, P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 439–465.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A (2007) Engaged Scholarship. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A (2007) Personal communication between first author and Professor Van de Ven at Academy of Management Meetings, Philadelphia, PA., USA.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A and Johnson, P (2006) Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review 31: 802–821.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, S (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 3: 119–138.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, S and Sarasvathy, S (2001) ‘Strategy and entrepreneurship: Outlines of an untold story’ in Hitt, M, Freeman, RE and Harrison, J (Eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management. Oxford: Blackwell (pp 650–668).Google Scholar
West, GP (2007) Collective Cognition: When entrepreneurial teams, not individuals, make decisions. Entrepreneurship, Theory, and Practice 31: 77–78.Google Scholar