Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:45:49.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to interact with knowledge-intensive business services: A multiple case study of small and medium manufacturing enterprises in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

Dan Zhou ,
Mika Kautonen ,
Hecheng Wang  and
Lin Wang
Dan Zhou*
Affiliation:
School of Management, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
Mika Kautonen
Affiliation:
Unit for Science, Technology and Innovation Studies (TaSTI), School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
Hecheng Wang
Affiliation:
School of Management, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China
Lin Wang
Affiliation:
School of Administration, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, China
*
Corresponding author: doriszhou05@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Empirical support for the process and mechanism of interactions with knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) is scarce, particularly with regard to small and medium manufacturing enterprises (SMMEs). Our study investigated how four SMMEs in China’s electrical appliance industry cluster attained high performance through interactions with KIBS. For our research, knowledge integration can be understood as knowledge identification, knowledge accession, and knowledge utilization. We investigated the mechanism involved in interactions between SMMEs and KIBS by tentative multiple case studies, and found that interactions with technology-based KIBS improved the performance of SMMEs by influencing their knowledge accession and knowledge utilization. Interactions with traditional professional KIBS, however, mainly influence SMMEs’ knowledge identification and knowledge accession. technology-based KIBS generally acts as a knowledge source and professional KIBS as a knowledge bridge for SMMEs. Interaction with technology-based KIBS is a kind of complementary interaction, while interaction with professional KIBS is a kind of supplementary interaction.

Keywords

knowledge-intensive business servicesmall and medium manufacturing enterpriseknowledge integrationcomplementary interactionsupplementary interaction
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 297 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brunswicker, S., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2015). Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs): External knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1241–1263.Google Scholar
Buckley, P. J., Glaister, K. W., Klijn, E., & Tan, H. (2009). Knowledge accession and knowledge acquisition in strategic alliances: The impact of supplementary and complementary dimensions. British Journal of Management, 20, 598–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24, 29–39.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J., & Zhang, F. (2012). Knowledge accession strategies and the spatial organization of R&D. In M. Andersson, B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, & H. Loof (Eds.), Innovation and growth: from R&D strategies of innovating firms to economy-wide technological change (pp. 88–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnabuci, G., & Operti, E. (2013). Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intra-organizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1591–1613.Google Scholar
Castaldi, C., Faber, J., & Kishna, M. J. (2013). Co-innovation by KIBS in environmental services – a knowledge-based perspective. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(5), 1350020-1–1350020-17.Google Scholar
Consoli, D., & Hortelano, D. E. (2010). Variety in the knowledge base of knowledge intensive business sectors. Research Policy, 39(10), 1303–1310.Google Scholar
Corrocher, N., & Cusmano, L. (2014). The ‘KIBS engine’ of regional innovation systems: empirical evidence from European regions. Reginal Studies, 48(7), 1212–1226.Google Scholar
Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31–61.Google Scholar
den Hertog, P. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 491–528.Google Scholar
den Hertog, P., Gallouj, F., & Segers, J. (2011). Measuring innovation in a ‘low-tech’ service industry: the case of the Dutch hospitality industry. The Service Industries Journal, 31(9), 1429–1449.Google Scholar
Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2008). Measuring and improving productivity in services: Issues, strategies and challenges . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2013). The productivity challenge in services: Measurement and strategic perspectives. The Service Industries Journal, 33(3–4), 282–299.Google Scholar
Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2012). How much does KIBS contribute to R&D activities of manufacturing firms? Economia Politica, 29(3), 319–341.Google Scholar
Drejer, I., & Vinding, A. L. (2005). Location and collaboration: Manufacturing firms’ use of knowledge intensive services in product innovation. European Planning Studies, 13(6), 879–898.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1991). Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review, 16, 620–627.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, J., & Guo, H. (2013). Electronic information industry, clustering and growth: Empirical study of the Chinese enterprises. Chinese Management Studies, 7(2), 172–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, J. J. M. (2013). Knowledge spillovers: Cooperation between universities and KIBS. R&D Management, 43(5), 461–472.Google Scholar
Franco, M., & Haase, H. (2015). Interfirm alliances: A taxonomy for SMEs. Long Range Planning, 48, 168–181.Google Scholar
Fu, Q. Y., Chui, Y. P., & Helander, M. G. (2006). Knowledge identification and management in produce design. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(6), 50–63.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996a). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996b). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61–84.Google Scholar
Guerrieri, P., & Meliciani, V. (2005). Technology and international competitiveness: The interdependence between manufacturing and producer services. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16, 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakansson, H. (1982). International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods: An interaction approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hauknes, J. (1998). Services in innovation-innovation in services (ERB-SOE1-CT-96-1015). Retrieved from Oslo: STEP group.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgos, D., & Koch, A. (2008). The internal differentiation of the KIBS sector: Empirical evidence from cluster analysis. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 10(2–4), 190–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, H.-F., Kao, H.-P., & Chu, Y.-Y. (2008). An empirical study on knowledge integration, technology innovation and experimental practice. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(1–2), 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraaijenbrink, J., Wijnhoven, F., & Groen, A. (2007). Towards a kernel theory of external knowledge integration for high-tech firms: Exploring a failed theory test. Technological Forcasting & Social Change, 74, 1215–1233.Google Scholar
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Doloreux, D. (2012). Knowledge-exchange strategies between KIBS firms and their clients. The Service Industries Journal, 32(2), 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. (2014). Globalization of Chinese firms: What happens to culture? Management and Organization Review, 10(3), 391–397.Google Scholar
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.Google Scholar
Liu, R., Weng, Q., Mao, G., & Huang, T. (2013). Industrial cluster, government agency and entrepreneurial development. Chinese Management Studies, 7(2), 253–280.Google Scholar
Lovelock, C., & Jochen, W. (2011). Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy (7th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Luca, L. M. D., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71, 95–112.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2003). Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1315–1327.Google Scholar
Martin, J. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2010). Rewiring: Cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 265–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, I. (2005). Knowledge intensive business services: Prospects and policies. Foresight, 7(6), 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Flanagan, K., Bilderbeek, R., Hertog, P. d., Huntink, W., & Bouman, M. (1995). Knowledge-intensive business services – users, carriers and sources of innovation. a report to DG13 Sprint-EIMS-.Retrieved from Luxembourg: The University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: The role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501–1516.Google Scholar
Müller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: The role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30, 1501–1516.Google Scholar
Orsi, L., Ganzaroli, A., Noni, I. D., & Marelli, F. (2015). Knowledge utilisation drivers in technological M&As. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(8), 877–894.Google Scholar
Park, S. H., & Chan, K. S. (1989). A cross country input-output analysis of intersectoral relationships between manufacturing and service and their employment implications. World Development, 17(2), 199–212.Google Scholar
Pilat, D., & Wolfl, A. (2005). Measuring the interaction between manufacturing and services, STI working paper, France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preissl, B. (2007). The German service gap or re-organizing the manufacturing-services puzzle. Metroeconomica, 58(3), 457–478.Google Scholar
Rajala, R., Westerlund, M., & Rajala, A. (2008). Knowledge-intensive service activities in software business. International Journal of Technology Management, 41(3/4), 273–290.Google Scholar
Scarso, E., & Bolisani, E. (2012). Trust in knowledge exchanges between service providers and clients: A multiple case study of KIBS. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 10(1), 16–26.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, M. (2006). Integration cross-border knowledge for transnational new product development. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 541–555.Google Scholar
Toivonen, M., Brax, S., & Tuominen, T. (2008). Client-oriented multicompetence – the core asset in KIBS. International Journal of Service Technology and Management, 10(2/3/4), 175–189.Google Scholar
Tsiotsou, R. H., & Jochen, W. (2012). Consumer behavior in a service context. In V. Wells, & G. Foxall (Eds), Handbook of developments in consumer behavior (pp. 147–201). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Tsiotsou, R. H., & Wirtz, J. (2015). The three-stage model of service consumption. In J. R. Bryson, & P. W. Daniels (Eds.), Handbook of Service Business-Management, Marketing, Innovation and Internationalisation (p. 464). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Valk, W. V. d. (2007). Buyer-seller interaction patterns during ongoing service exchange. PhD, Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Valk, W. v. d. (2008). Service procurement in manufacturing companies: Results of three embedded case studies. Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 301–315.Google Scholar
Valk, W. v. d. (2009). Buying business services: Towards a structured service purchasing process. Journal of Service Marketing, 23(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Valk, W. v. d., Wynstra, F., & Axelsson, B. (2009). Effective buyer-supplier interaction patterns in ongoing service exchange. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(8), 807–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valminen, K., & Toivonen, M. (2012). Seeking efficiency through productisation: A case study of small KIBS participating in a productisation project. The Service Industries Journal, 32(2), 273–289.Google Scholar
Vasudeva, G., & Anand, J. (2011). Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 611–623.Google Scholar
von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. The Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 155–174.Google Scholar
Wagner, S., Hoisl, K., & Thoma, G. (2014). Overcoming localization of knowledge – the role of professional service firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1671–1688.Google Scholar
Wynstra, F., Axelsson, B., & Valk, W. v. d. (2006). An application-based classification to understand buyer-supplier interaction in business service. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(5), 474–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research-design and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zhang, F., & Cantwell, J. A. (2013). Regional and global technological knowledge search strategies and the innovative performance of large multinational corporations. Industry and Innovation, 20(7), 637–660.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2010). Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 88–109.Google Scholar
Zhou, D., & Wei, J. (2009). A comparison study on interactive demand between producer services and manufacturing industries in Japan, Germany, Korea and Brazil. Paper presented at the International Conference on Management of Technology, Taiyuan, November 20th.Google Scholar