Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:51:39.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intrapreneurship in Australian Firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2016

Jason R. Fitzsimmons ,
Evan J. Douglas ,
Bostjan Antoncic  and
Robert D. Hisrich
Jason R. Fitzsimmons
Affiliation:
Brisbane Graduate School of Business, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia, Phone: + 61 73864 2036, Fax:, + 61 73864 1299, Email: j.fitzsimmons@qut.edu.au
Evan J. Douglas
Affiliation:
Brisbane Graduate School of Business, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia, Phone: + 61 73864 1089, Fax:, + 61 73864 1299, Email: evan.douglas@qut.edu.au
Bostjan Antoncic
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva pl. 17, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, Phone: + 386 1 5892-576, Fax:, + 386 1 5892-698, E-mail: bostjan.antoncic@uni-lj.si
Robert D. Hisrich
Affiliation:
Thunderbird, The Garvin School of International, Management, 15249 N. 59th Avenue, Glendale AZ 85306-6000, USA, Phone: + 1 602 978 7000, E-mail: garvincenter@t-bird.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports on the nature and extent of intrapreneurship (or corporate entrepreneurship) practiced by Australian businesses. We examined the relationship between measures of corporate entrepreneurship and finn growth and profitability. and utilised measures devised by earlier researchers attempting to assess corporate entrepreneurship, viz: new business venturing, innovativeness, self-renewal, and proactiveness. Control variables included industry, finn age, and finn size. Interestingly, we found that the items measuring corporate entrepreneurship loaded onto not four but five factors, effectively splitting the self-renewal measure into two distinct elements, Profitability was significantly correlated with self-renewal (negative) and organisational support (positive) while growth was found to be significantly and positively related to both new business venturing and environmental munificence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 17 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. 2001. Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 495–527.Google Scholar
Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R.D. 2003, Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1): 7–24.Google Scholar
Chandler, G.N., & Hanks, S.H. 1993. Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(5): 391–408.Google Scholar
Chandler, G., Keller, C., & Lyon, D. 2000. Unraveling the determinants and consequences of an innovation-supportive organisational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall: 59–76.Google Scholar
Covin, J.G. 1991. Entrepreneurial vs. conservative firms: A comparison of strategies and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 25(5): 439–462.10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00763.xGoogle Scholar
Covin, J.G., & Miles, M.P. 1999. Corporate entre-preneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Spring: 47–63.Google Scholar
Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. 1986. The development and testing of an organisational-level entrepreneurship scale. In Ronstadt, R., et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 75–87.10.1002/smj.4250100107Google Scholar
Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as finn behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1): 7–25.Google Scholar
Dess, G.G., Ireland, R.D., Zahra, S.A., Floyd, S.W., Janney, J.J., & Lane, P.J. 2003. Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3): 351–378.Google Scholar
Guth, W.D., & Ginsberg, A. 1990. Guest editors' introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 5–15.Google Scholar
Khandwalla, P.N. 1977. The Design of Organisations. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Knight, G.A. 1997. Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3): 213–225.Google Scholar
Kreiser, P., Marino, L., & Weaver, K. 2002. Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: A multi-country analysis. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, Summer: 71–94.Google Scholar
Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 12(1): 135–172.10.2307/258632Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1983. The correlates of entrepreneur-ship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7): 770–791.Google Scholar
Miller, D., & Friesen, RH. 1978. Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24(9): 921–933.Google Scholar
Miller, D., & Friesen, RH. 1982. Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3: 921–933.10.1002/smj.4250030102Google Scholar
Miller, D., & Friesen, P.H. 1983. Strategy making and environment. Strategic Management Journal, 4: 221–235.Google Scholar
Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. 1999. Towards a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, Spring: 11–27.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H.H., & Jarillo, J.C. 1990. A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 17–27.Google Scholar
Wang, C.K., & Ang, B.L. 2004. Determinants of venture performance in Singapore. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(4): 347–363.Google Scholar
Wiklund, J. 1999. The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall: 37–48.Google Scholar
Zahra, S.A. 1991. Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4): 259–285.Google Scholar
Zahra, S.A. 1993. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4): 319–340.10.1016/0883-9026(93)90003-NGoogle Scholar
Zahra, S., Covin, J. 1995. Contextual influence on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10: 43–58.10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-EGoogle Scholar