Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:48:36.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nanette Monin 2004Management Theory. A Critical and Reflexive Reading In the Management, Organisations and Society Series Edited by Barbara Czarniawska & Martha Feldman RoutledgeLondon & New York

Review products

Nanette Monin 2004Management Theory. A Critical and Reflexive Reading In the Management, Organisations and Society Series Edited by Barbara Czarniawska & Martha Feldman RoutledgeLondon & New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2016

Viviane Morrigan
Viviane Morrigan*
Affiliation:
School of Management and Marketing, University of Wollongong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 75 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Monin claims that she is not providing a method as it has traditionally been understood, particularly in the positivist traditions' but, rather, ‘a reading process, one that allows individual readers who follow a similar process to arrive at dramatically different interpretations’ (p.73)

2 For example: a word (‘… happens. (?she) does not …’) appears to have been left out on the third line of page 114; commas (‘…process, does in …’ and ‘… Follett, lived …’ and ‘… As I noted, elements …’) have been inserted incorrectly in the second line of the fourth paragraph on page 131, on the second line of the third paragraph on page 168, and on the first line of the opening paragraph on page 189; a typographical error (‘if’) occurs on the fourth line from the bottom of page 134; an incorrect verb form (‘maintained’) is on the last line of the fourth paragraph on page 159: and an apostrophe (‘… my directors script …’) omitted on the first line of the last paragraph on page 195.