Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:27:43.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regularities of diversity discourse: Address, categorization, and invitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Tanja Juul Christiansen  and
Sine Nørholm Just
Tanja Juul Christiansen
Affiliation:
Department of Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
Sine Nørholm Just
Affiliation:
Department of Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Managerial discourses on diversity invoke goals of inclusion and emancipation of suppressed individuals and groups as well as objectives of creating benefits for organizations and society. Partially due to this two-fold emphasis, diversity discourses may, however, be as restricting as they are liberating to the subjects of which they speak. In this article we suggest that utterances pertaining to diversity discourse should be understood as constitutive rhetoric marked by three discursive regularities: address, categorization, and invitation. These regularities underlie and restrain the multiple discursive practices of the developing field of diversity management, and as researchers and practitioners alike continue to explore and enhance this field it is important to understand – and seek to broaden – its conditions of possibility. Emphasizing the theoretical argument about discursive regularities and their articulation, we provide an illustrative example of the how different discursive practices may reproduce common limitations by exploring contributions to Danish diversity discourse.

Keywords

diversitydiscourserhetoricconstitutive perspectiveaddresscategorizationinvitation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , May 2012 , pp. 398 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, A. (1998). Power trouble: Performativity as critical theory. Constellations, 5(4), 456–471.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Arla. (n.d.). Hvad er en god arbejdsplads? Retrieved from http://www.arlafoods.dk/om-arla/vores-ansvar/arbejdspladsenGoogle Scholar
Bendl, R., Fleischmann, A., & Hofmann, R. (2009). Queer theory and diversity management: Reading codes of conduct from a queer perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(5), 625–638.Google Scholar
Bendl, R., Fleischmann, A., & Walenta, C. (2008). Diversity management discourse meets queer theory. Gender in Management, 23(6), 382–394.Google Scholar
Billing, Y. D., & Sundin, E. (2006). From managing equality to managing diversity: A critical Scandinavian perspective on gender and workplace diversity. In Konrad, A. M., Prasad, P., & Pringle, J. K. (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 95–120). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
Black, E. (1970). The second persona. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 56(2), 109–119.Google Scholar
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boxenbaum, E. (2006). Lost in translation: The making of Danish diversity management. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 939–948.Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech. A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calás, M., Holgersson, C., & Smircich, L. (2009). ‘Diversity management’? Translation? Travel? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(4), 349–351.Google Scholar
Calás, M., & Smircich, L. (1996). From ‘the woman's’ point of view: Feminist approaches to organization studies. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 218–257). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
Charland, M. (1987). Constitutive rhetoric: The case of the Peuple Québécois. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73(2), 133–150.Google Scholar
Charland, M. (2001). Constitutive rhetoric. In Sloane, T. O. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of rhetoric (pp. 616–619). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Copenhagen City Council. (n.d.). Integrationsog oplœringsstillinger. Retrieved from http://www.kk.dk/Job/UddannelseOgOplaering/IntegrationsOgOplaering.aspxGoogle Scholar
Copenhagen City Council. (2011). Mangfoldighed ogligestilling. Retrieved from http://www.kk.dk/sitecore/content/Subsites/medarbejder/SubsiteFrontpage/KoebenhavnsKommuneSomArbejdsplads/MangfoldighedOgLigestilling.aspxGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. (1981). Positions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Diedrich, A., & Styhre, A. (2008). Making the refugee multiple: The effects of classification work. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(4), 330–342.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–284). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. The will to knowledge (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Gremmen, I., & Benschop, Y. (2009). Walking the tightrope: Constructing gender and professional identities in account management. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(5), 596–610.Google Scholar
Holvino, E., & Kamp, A. (2009). Diversity management: Are we moving in the right direction? Reflections from both sides of the North Atlantic. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(4), 395–403.Google Scholar
Kamp, A., & Rasmussen, P. H. (2002). Mangfoldighedsledelse. Et litteraturstudie om koncept, teori og praksis. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. L., & Harter, L. M. (2001). Discourses of diversity and the quality of work life: The character and costs of the managerial metaphor. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 121–127.Google Scholar
Liff, S. (1997). Two routes to managing diversity: Individual differences or social group characteristics. Employee Relations, 19(1), 11–26.Google Scholar
Litvin, D. R. (1997). The discourse of diversity: From biology to management. Organization, 4(2) 187–209.Google Scholar
Lorbiecki, A., & Jack, G. (2000). Critical turns in the evolution of diversity management. British Journal of Management, 11, S17–S31.Google Scholar
Martin, D. M. (2000). Re-examining diversity paradigms: The role of management communication. Journal of the Northwest Communication Association, 29, 12–31.Google Scholar
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.Google Scholar
McGee, M. C. (1975). In search of ‘the people’: A rhetorical alternative. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61(3) 235–249.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, B. D., & Woodhams, C. (2008). Critical perspectives in diversity and equality management. Gender in Management, 23(6), 377–381.Google Scholar
Nkomo, S. M., & Cox, T. (1996). Diverse identities in organizations. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 338–356). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
Novozymes. (2010). Diversity and equal opportunities. Retrieved from http://www.novozymes.com/en/about-us/vision-and-values/positions/Pages/Diversity-and-equal-opportunities-.aspxGoogle Scholar
Omanovi, V. (2009). Diversity and its management as dialectical process: Encountering Sweden and the U.S. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(4) 352–362.Google Scholar
Özbilgin, M., & Syed, J. (Eds.). (2010). Managing gender diversity in Asia. A research companion. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Phillips, K. R. (2006). Rhetorical maneuvers: Subjectivity, power, and resistance. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 39(4), 310–332.Google Scholar
Rennison, B. W. (2009). Kampen om integrationen. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.Google Scholar
Risberg, A., & Søderberg, A.-M. (2008). Translating a management concept: Diversity management in Denmark. Gender in Management, 23(6), 426–441.Google Scholar
Sampson, E. E. (1989). The deconstruction of the self. In Shotter, J. & Gergen, K. J. (Eds.), Texts of identity (pp. 1–19). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
Sheridan, A., Pringle, J., & Strachan, G. (2009). Editorial: Profitable margins. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(5), 544–548.Google Scholar
Syed, J., & Kramar, R. (2009). Socially responsible diversity management. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(5), 639–651.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, F., & Schwabenland, C. (2010). Reconciling competing discourses of diversity? The UK non-profit sector between social justice and the business case. Organization, 17(1), 101–121.Google Scholar
Treaty Establishing the European Community. (2002). Official Journal of the European Communities, C325, 33–184.Google Scholar
Walby, S. (2007). Gender (in)equality and the future of work. Manchester, England: Equal Opportunities Commission.Google Scholar
Watson, T. J. (1995). Rhetoric, discourse and argument in organizational sense making: A reflexive tale. Organization Studies, 16(5), 805–821.Google Scholar
Wrench, J. (2005). Diversity management can be bad for you. Race & Class, 46(3), 73–84.Google Scholar
Wrench, J. (2007). Diversity management and discrimination. Immigrants and ethnic minorities in the EU. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Zanoni, P., & Janssens, M. (2004). Deconstructing difference: The rhetoric of human resource managers' diversity discourses. Organization Studies, 25(1) 55–74.Google Scholar
Zanoni, P., Janssens, M., Benschop, Y., & Nkomo, S. (2010). Unpacking diversity, grasping inequality: Rethinking difference through critical perspectives. Organization, 17(1), 9–29.Google Scholar
Zarrehparvar, M., & Hildebrandt, S. (2005). Diskrimination i Danmark. In Nour, S., & Thisted, L. N. (Eds.), Mangfoldighed i arbejdslivet (pp. 43–68). Copenhagen, Denmark: Børsens Forlag.Google Scholar