Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:36:47.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Take your lead: The pleasures of power in universities and beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2019

Jonathan Robert Gosling
Jonathan Robert Gosling*
Affiliation:
Pelumbra Ltd, 54 Velwell Road, Exeter EX4 4LD, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jonathan.gosling@exeter.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ken Parry once asked me why I wanted to take the lead on a particular initiative. This paper summarises the answer I'd like to have given him. Taking the lead is pleasurable in three principle ways: it affirms or modifies self-concept, confirms a degree of control over the external world and promises self-transcendence through relationship with others. The paper proposes three categories: identity, influence and interaction, as the basis of an analytic framework for further research into the pleasures of power.

Keywords

power and politicsleadershipmanagement effectivenessorganisational behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 25 , Special Issue 3: ‘Take your Lead’: In Search of Very Short, Fairly Interesting, and Reasonably Impactful Contributions to the Future of Leadership Studies , May 2019 , pp. 389 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dedicated to Professor Ken Parry.

References

Bolden, R., Gosling, J., O'Brien, A., Peters, K., Ryan, M., & Haslam, S.A. (2012). Academic leadership: Changing conceptions, identities and experiences in UK Higher Education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. (64 pages). doi: 10.13140/2.1.1957.6009.Google Scholar
Case, P., & Gosling, J. (2007). Wisdom of the moment: Premodern perspectives on organizational action. Social Epistemology, special issue on Wisdom and Stupidity in Management 21(2) (pp. 87–111).Google Scholar
Ford, J. (2019). Rethinking relational leadership: Recognising the mutual dynamics between leaders and led. In Carroll, B., Firth, J. & Wilson, S. (Eds.), After leadership (pp. 64–80). Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1986). The care of the self: The history of sexuality (Vol. 3). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Gosling, J., & Jones, S. (2018) El liderazgo estratégico y la táctica del poder: de Napoleón Bonaparte a la corporacion moderna/Strategic leadership and the tactics of power: from Naploeon Bonaparte to the modern corporation. In Guimerá Ravian, A. (Ed.), El Liderazgo Estratégico: una aproximación interdisciplina (pp. 131–150). Madrid: Ministerio de DefensaGoogle Scholar
Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kempster, S., & Parry, K. (2019). After leaders: A world of leading and leadership … with no leaders. In Carroll, B., Firth, J. & Wilson, S. (Eds.), After leadership (pp. 64–80). Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawrence, W.G. (1979). The management of oneself in role. In Lawrence, W.G. (Ed.), Exploring individual and organizational boundaries (pp.235–249) Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1973). Power: A radical view. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Maccoby, M. (1998) Nacissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. Harvard Business Review November 82(1) (pp. 1–11).Google Scholar
Sutherland, I., Gosling, J., & Jelinek, J. (2015). Aesthetics of power: Why teaching about power is easier than learning for power, and what business schools could do about it. Academy of Management Journal of Learning and Education 14(4), (pp. 607–624).Google Scholar