Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:51:55.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transformational change in the local state? Enacting e-government in English local authorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Ian McLoughlin  and
James Cornford
Ian McLoughlin
Affiliation:
Business School/Centre for Social and Business Informatics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
James Cornford
Affiliation:
Business School/Centre for Social and Business Informatics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

E-government represents a major change management challenge to public agencies. This paper explores the experience of English local government authorities. The proposition that ‘process’, rather than more conventional ‘event’, approaches to change management are more likely to result in change the goals of e-government being met, is explored. The article concludes by suggesting that conventional models of change management theory and practice fundamentally misunderstand the nature of technology-driven organisational change represented by e-government. A processualperspective, on the other hand, provides a more effective framework for explaining and understanding organisational and socio-technical outcomes and the reasons for variations in different contexts. Moreover, attempts to transform the state through the technologies of e-government present a significant opportunity for the processual perspective to inform practice.

Keywords

transformational changee-governmentchange management
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , November 2006 , pp. 195 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellamy, C and Taylor, J (1998) Governing in the information age. Open University Press, Buckingham.Google Scholar
Badham, R (1995) Managing socio-technical change: A configurations approach to technology implementation, in Benders, J, de Haan, J and Bennett, D (Eds) The Symbiosis of Work and Technology, pp 77–94, Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Buchanan, D (1994) Theories of change. Working Paper, Loughborough University, UK.Google Scholar
Buchanan, D and Boddy, D (1992) The expertise of the change agent: Public performance and backstage activity. Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
Buchanan, D and Badham, R (1999) Power, politics and organisational change. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Clark, J, McLoughlin, I, Rose, H and King, R (1988) The process of technological change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cornford, J, Wessels, B, Richardson, R, Gillespie, A, McLoughlin, I, Kohannejad, J, Belt, V and Martin, M (2003) Local e-Government: Process evaluation of the implementation of electronic local Government in England. ODPM (11), London.Google Scholar
Dawson, P (2003a) Reshaping change: A processual perspective. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, P, Margetts, H, Bastow, S, Tinkler, J and Yared, H (2001) Policy learning and public sector information technology: Contractual and e-Government changes in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, 28 08-1 September, Hilton Hotel, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Fountain, J (2002) Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institute Press, New York.Google Scholar
Grint, K and Woolgar, S (1998) The machine at work. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heeks, R (2005) E-government as a carrier of context, Journal of Public Policy, 25 (1): 51–74.Google Scholar
Kraemer, K and King, JL (2003) Information technology and administrative reform: Will the time after e-government be different? Centre for Research on Information Technology and Organisations, University of California.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, I (1999) Creative technological change: Shaping technology and organisation. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, IP and Clark, J (1994) Technological change at work. 2nd Edition. Open University Press, Stony Stratford.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, IP, Badham, R and Couchman, P (2000) Rethinking political process in technological change, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12 (1): 17–38.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, IP, Cornford, J, Martin, M & Dobson, J (2004) Advanced multi-agency service environment (AMASE). End of Award Report to Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) GR/R53906/01.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, IP, Baines, S, Wilson, R, Martin, M and Vaughan, R (2005) Unlocking transformational change in the local state? Developing a generic framework for advanced multi-agency working in the UK. Paper delivered at Australia and New Zealand Academy of Management Annual Conference, 12 7-10, Canberra.Google Scholar
ODPM (2002) The national strategy for local e-Government.Google Scholar
ODPM (2003). Local e-Government: A survey of local authorities. ODPM, London.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W and Hofman, D (1997) An improvisational model for change management: The case of groupware technologies, Sloan Management Review Winter, pp 11–21.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A (1973) The politics of organisational decision-making. Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A (1985) The awakening giant. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Thomas, RJ (1994) What machines can't do: Politics and technology in the industrial enterprise. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar