Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:22:35.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Constitutes Successful Entrepreneurship? An Analysis of Recent Australasian Awards Experiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Kate Kearins ,
Belinda Luke  and
Patricia Corner
Kate Kearins
Affiliation:
Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, New Zealand Phone: + 64 917 9999 ext 5422, Fax:, +64 9 917 9884, Email: kate.kearins@aut.ac.nz
Belinda Luke
Affiliation:
Unitec New Zealand, Private Bag 92025, Carrington, Road, Mt Albert, Auckland, New Zealand Phone: +64 9 815 4321 ext 8794 Email: bluke@unitec.ac.nz
Patricia Corner
Affiliation:
Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, New Zealand Phone: +64 917 9999 ext 5415, Fax: +64 9 917 9884, Email: trish.corner@aut.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Theory about what constitutes entrepreneurial success is explored using case studies of the 2003 Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award winners for Australia and New Zealand. Findings suggest the need to more equally emphasize what theory presents as elements of successful entrepreneurship, and importantly, incorporate ethics as a key dimension. Further, the analysis offers insight into how business awards processes in general might be conducted.

Entrepreneurship has long been considered an important economic activity. The past twenty years has witnessed an explosion of research into entrepreneurs and their actions (Venkatarman 1997; Hannafey 2003) with considerable emphasis on the elements that constitute successful entrepreneurship. However, there has been little empirical work substantiating these elements or exploring the extent to which they appear to be considered when judgements are made about entrepreneurial success. Additionally, some entrepreneurs that are judged successful, such as Monty Fu who won an entrepreneur of the year award in the United States, are later shown to be unsuccessful along a number of elements. It may be that some elements are more emphasized when judging entrepreneurial endeavours, than are others. For these reasons, the current paper focuses on the construction of successful entrepreneurship. It addresses the following research questions: Are there some elements of entrepreneurship that appear to be more emphasized than are others when judgements are made about successful entrepreneurs? Would recourse to theory help decide successful entrepreneurship?

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , January 2004 , pp. 41 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackroyd, S & Fleetwood, S 2000. Realist perspectives on organisation and management. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Anglican Media. 2004. Philanthropist named Entrepreneur of the Year 2003 — Opportunity International http://www.angli-canmedia.com.au/news/archives/003024.phpGoogle Scholar
Barth, F 1969. Ethnic groups and boundaries. Oslo: Universitetiforlarget.Google Scholar
Baumol, WJ 1990. ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaskar, R 1987. Scientific realism and human emancipation. Verso, London.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R. 1989. The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Harvester Wheatsheaf.: London.Google Scholar
Chapple, I 2003a. 03 5. ‘Goodbye mortgage, hello international success’, The New Zealand Herald.Google Scholar
Chapple, I 2003b. 10 9. ‘From layoffs to Entrepreneur of the Year’, The New Zealand Herald.Google Scholar
Cornwall, J & Naughton, M 2003. ‘Who is the good entrepreneur? An exploration within the Catholic social tradition’, Journal of Business Ethics. vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drucker, PF 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dunne, T.Roberts, M & Samuelson, L 1988. “Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. manufacturing industries’, Rand Journal of Economies, vol. 19, pp. 495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, JT & Shane, SA 2003. ‘Opportunities and entrepreneurship’, Journal of Management. vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkington, J 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone, London.Google Scholar
Ernst, & Young, 2003a. Seeking the next Entrepreneur of the Year http://www.ey.comglobal.nsf/US/EGCS_Entrepreneur_of_the_Year [Accessed 5 April. 2004].Google Scholar
Ernst, & Young, 2003b. Entrepreneur of the Year: Frequently asked questions http://www.ey.comglobal/content.nsf/Australia/Entrepreneur_of_theYear [Accessed 8 April. 2004].Google Scholar
Ernst, & Young, 2004c. Entrepreneur of the Year http:www.ey.com/global/content.nsf/New_ZealandEntrepreneur_of_the_Year [Accessed 13 January 2004].Google Scholar
Ernst, & Young, 2004d. Ernst & Young's Entrepreneur of the Year program. now in over 35 countries http://www.ey.coniglobal.nsf/International/EGC_Entrepreneur_of_the_Year [Accessed 5 April 2004].Google Scholar
Ernst, & Young, 2004e. About Ernst & Young http://www.ey.comglobal/content.nsf/International/About_EY [Accessed 15 April 2004].Google ScholarPubMed
Ernst, & Young, 2004f. She's in the business of winning http://www.ey.com/global/content.nsf/New_Zealand/Entrepreneur_of_the_Year/Overall_winner_2003 [Accessed 13 January 2004].Google Scholar
Ernst, & Young, 2004g. 2003 Entrepreneur of the Year heads organisation that creates a new job every 60 seconds http://www.ey.com/global/content.nsf/Australianews_release [Accessed 16 January 2004].Google Scholar
Etzioni, A 1987. ‘Entrepreneursiiip, adaptation and legitimation: A macro-behavioral perspective’ Journal of Econoniic Behavior and Organization, vol. 8, pp. 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleetwood, S 1999. Critical realism in economics: Development and debate, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Fleetwood, S 2005 forthcoming. ‘Re-thinking labour markets: A critical realist-socioeconomic perspective’. Capital and Class.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, WB 1988. ‘Who is an entrepreneur? is the wrong question’, American Journal of Small Business, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, A & Buchholtz, A 1989. ‘Are entrepreneurs a breed apart? A look at the evidence’, Journal of General Management, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, LC 1969. ‘Juvenile entrepreneurs’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 74, pp. 710–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamel, G & Prahalad, CK 1994. Competing for the future. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Hannafey, FT 2003. ‘Entrepreneurship and ethics: A Literature review’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 46, pp. 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, F 1901. ‘Reply to the final objections to the risk theory of profit’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol 15, p. 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwood, A (2003. 01 14) ‘From jobless to providing job hopes for thousands’, The New Zealand Herald.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.O'Sullivan, F & NZPA 2003. 11 6. ‘Chinese demand action on schools’, The New Zealand Herald.Google Scholar
Kaplan, RS & Norton, DP 1992. 01-February. ‘The balanced scoreeard – Measures that drive performance’, Harvard Business Review, pp. 71–79.Google Scholar
Kirchhoff, BA 1991. ‘Entrepreneurs' contribution to economics’, Entreimeneurship, Theory and Practice, vol. 16, pp. 93–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, FH 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kurlantzik, J 2003. ‘Liar. liar’, Entrepreneur, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 68–71.Google Scholar
Longenecker, JG. McKinney, JA & Moore, CW 1988. ‘Egoism and independence: Entrepreneurial ethics’, Organizational Dynamics, vol. 16, pp. 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, DC 1961. The achieving society. Van Nostrand, Princeton. NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menger, C 1892. On the origins of money http://cepa.newsehool.edu/het [Accessed 15 March 2004].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, JS 1848. Principles of political economy with some of their applications to social philosophy. John W. Parker, London.Google Scholar
Milton, DG 1989. ‘The compleat entrepreneur’, Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
Opportunity International 2003. Annual Report 2002.Google Scholar
Opportunity International 2004a. Annual Report 2002; Highlights http://www.opportunity.org.au/article/articleview/208/16 [Accessed 7 April 2004].Google Scholar
Opportunity International. 2004b. Our story - Detail http://www.opportunity.org.au/article/article-view/6/1/6 [Accessed 7 April 2004].Google Scholar
Opportunity International 2004c. How we help http://www.opportunity.org.au/article/arti-elestatie/98/1/29 [Accessed 15 April. 2004].Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, F & Perrott, A 2003. 12 22. ‘Loss of Chinese students rocks S1.7b education industry’, The New Zealand Herald.Google Scholar
Perrott, A. Dearnaley, M & Watkin, T 2003. 11 8. ‘Where it all went wrong for Carich’, The New Zealand Herald.Google Scholar
Rumelt, RP 1987. ‘Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship’, in Teece, DJ (ed). The competitive challenge. Harper & Row, New York. pp.137–158.Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, D.Simon, H & Lave, L 1998. ‘Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehumpteter, JA 1934. The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. MA.Google Scholar
Shane, S 2003. A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar, Northampton. VIA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S & Yenkataraman, S 2000. ‘The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp 217–226.Google Scholar
Shapero, A 1975. ‘The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur, Psychology Today, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 83–88.Google Scholar
Sinoski, K 2003. 12 10. ‘Rush to restore NZ's damaged reputation’, The Independent.Google Scholar
Tyndale, P 2004. Don't look back: The David Bussau story. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest. NSW.Google Scholar
Torbit, M & Chappie, I 2003, 10 30. ‘Thousands locked out of schools’, The New Zealand Herald.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, S 1997. ‘The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective’, in Katz, J & Brockhaus, R (eds). Advances in entrepreneurship: Firm emergence and growth, vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. pp. 119–138.Google Scholar
Warren, A 2003. 12 12.‘Ethics plan for private tuition’. The Press.Google Scholar
Yin, RK 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. Sage, London.Google Scholar