Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:30:14.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asynchronous stoichiometric response in lithium iron phosphate batteries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2014

William A. Paxton Open the ORCID record for William A. Paxton [Opens in a new window] ,
E. Koray Akdoğan ,
İlyas Şavkliyildiz ,
Ankur U. Choksi ,
Scott X. Silver ,
Thomas Tsakalakos  and
Zhong Zhong
William A. Paxton*
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
E. Koray Akdoğan
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
İlyas Şavkliyildiz
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
Ankur U. Choksi
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
Scott X. Silver
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
Thomas Tsakalakos
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
Zhong Zhong
Affiliation:
Photon Sciences, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: will.paxton@rutgers.edu
Get access

Abstract

Operando energy-dispersive x-ray diffraction (EDXRD) was carried out on a newly formed 8 Ah lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) battery with the goal of elucidating the origin of asynchronous phase transformation commonly seen with in situ x-ray diffraction studies. The high-energy photons at the NSLS X17B1 beamline allow for penetration into a fully assembled battery and therefore negate any need for a specially designed in situ cell which often uses modified current collectors to minimize x-ray attenuation. Spatially-and-temporally resolved phase-mapping was conducted with a semiquantitative reference intensity ratio (RIR) analysis to estimate the relative abundance of the delithiated phase. The data show an asynchronous response in the stoichiometry versus the electrochemical profile and suggest limited diffusion in the electrode toward the end of discharge. Our results confirm that the asynchronous electrode response is not just limited to specially designed cells but occurs in fully assembled cells alike. We attribute this behavior to be a consequence of performing a local measurement over a wide-area heterogeneous reaction.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 30 , Issue 3: Focus Issue: In-situ and Operando Characterization of Materials , 14 February 2015 , pp. 417 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armand, M. and Tarascon, J.M.: Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scrosati, B. and Garche, J.: Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future. J. Power Sources 195, 2419–2430 (2009).Google Scholar
Croy, J.R., Abouimrane, A., and Zhang, Z.: Next-generation lithium-ion batteries: The promise of near-term advancements. MRS Bull. 39(5), 407 (2014).Google Scholar
Reddy, T.B.: Linden’s Handbook of Batteries, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2011).Google Scholar
Ebner, M., Marone, F., Stampanoni, M., and Wood, V.: Visualization and quantification of electrochemical and mechanical degradation in Li ion batteries. Science 342(6159), 716–720 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reimers, J.N. and Dahn, J.R.: Electrochemical and in situ x-ray diffraction studies of lithium intercalation in LixCoO2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 139(8), 2091–2097 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amatucci, G.G., Tarascon, J.M., and Klein, L.C.: CoO2, the end member of the LixCoO2 solid solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 143(3), 1114–1123 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morcrette, M., Chabre, Y., Vaughan, G., Amatucci, G., Leriche, J-B., Patoux, S., Masquelier, C., and Tarascon, J-M.: In situ x-ray diffraction techniques as a powerful tool to study battery electrode materials. Electrochim. Acta 47(19), 3137–3149 (2002).Google Scholar
Rodriguez, M.A., Ingersolla, D., Vogel, S.C., and Williams, D.J.: Simultaneous in situ neutron diffraction studies of the anode and cathode in a lithium-ion cell. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 7(1), A8–A10 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padhi, A.K., Nanjundaswamy, K.S., and Goodenough, J.B.D.. Phospho-olivines as positive-electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 1188–1194 (1997).Google Scholar
Yamada, A., Chung, S.C., and Hinokuma, K.: Optimized LiFePO4 for lithium battery cathodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 148, A224 (2001).Google Scholar
Chung, S-Y., Bloking, J.T., and Chiang, Y-M.: Electronically conductive phospho-olivines as lithium storage electrodes. Nat. Mater. 1(2), 123–128 (2002).Google Scholar
Zhang, W-J.: Structure and performance of LiFePO4 cathode materials: A review. J. Power Sources 196(6), 2962–2970 (2011).Google Scholar
Love, Corey T., Korovina, Anna, Patridge, Christopher J., Swider-Lyons, Karen E., Twigg, Mark E., and Ramaker, David E.: Review of LiFePO4 phase transition mechanisms and new observations from x-ray absorption spectroscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160(5), A3153–A3161 (2013).Google Scholar
Andersson, A.S., Kalska, B., Haggstrom, L., and Thomas, J.O.: Lithium extraction/insertion in LiFePO4: An x-ray diffraction and Mössbauer spectroscopy study. Solid State Ionics 130, 41–52 (2000).Google Scholar
Delmas, C., Maccario, M., Croguennec, L., Le Cras, F., and Weill, F.: Lithium deintercalation in LiFePO4 nanoparticles via a domino-cascade model. Nat. Mater. 7, 665–671 (2008).Google Scholar
Meethong, N., Kao, Y-H., Tang, M., Huang, H-Y., Carter, W.C., and Chiang, Y-M.: Electrochemically induced phase transformation in nanoscale olivines Li1−xMPO4 (M = Fe, Mn). Chem. Mater. 20, 6189–6198 (2008).Google Scholar
Chang, H-H., Chang, C-C., Wu, H-C., Yang, M-H., Sheu, H-S., and Wu, N-L.: Study on dynamics of structural transformation during charge/discharge of LiFePO4 cathode. Electrochem. Commun. 10(2), 335–339 (2008).Google Scholar
Shin, H.C., Chung, K.Y., Min, W.S., Byun, D.J., Jang, H., and Cho, B.W.: Asymmetry between charge and discharge during high rate cycling in LiFePO4 – In situ x-ray diffraction study. Electrochem. Commun. 10(4), 536–540 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, K., Fujieda, S., Shinoda, K., Suzuki, S., and Waseda, Y.: Chemical state of iron of LiFePO4 during charge-discharge cycles studied by in-situ x-ray absorption spectroscopy. Mater. Trans. 51(12), 2220–2224 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leriche, J.B., Hamelet, S., Shu, J., Morcrette, M., Masquelier, C., Ouvrard, G., Zerrouki, M., Soudan, P., Belic, S., Elkaïm, E., and Baudelet, F.: An electrochemical cell for operando study of lithium batteries using synchrotron radiation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157(5), A606–A610 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, H.C., Nam, K.W., Chang, Y.W., Cho, B.W., Yoon, W-S., Yang, X-Q., and Chung, K.Y.: Comparative studies on C-coated and uncoated LiFePO4 cycling at various rates and temperatures using synchrotron based in situ x-ray diffraction. Electrochim. Acta 56(3), 1182–1189 (2011).Google Scholar
Wang, X-J., Jaye, C., Nam, K-W., Zhang, B., Chen, H-Y., Bai, J., Li, H., Huang, X., Fischer, D.A., and Yang, X-Q.: Investigation of the structural changes in Li1−xFePO4 upon charging by synchrotron radiation techniques. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 11406–11411 (2011).Google Scholar
Liu, J., Kunz, M., Chen, K., Tamura, N., and Richardson, T.J.: Visualization of charge distribution in a lithium battery electrode. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1(14), 2120–2123 (2010).Google Scholar
Farkhondeh, M., Safari, M., Pritzker, M., Fowler, M., Han, Taeyoung, Wang, Jasmine, and Delacourt, C.: Full-range simulation of a commercial LiFePO4 electrode accounting for bulk and surface effects: A comparative analysis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161(3), A201–A212 (2014).Google Scholar
Ronci, F., Scrosati, B., Rossi Albertini, V., and Perfetti, P.: A novel approach to in situ diffractometry of intercalation materials: The EDXD technique preliminary results on LiNi0.8Co0.2O2. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 3(4), 174–177 (2000).Google Scholar
Panero, S., Reale, P., Ronci, F., Scrosati, B., Perfetti, P., and Rossi Albertini, V.: Refined, in-situ EDXD structural analysis of the Li[Li1/3Ti5/3]O4 electrode under lithium insertion–extraction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3, 845–847 (2001).Google Scholar
Rijssenbeek, J., Gao, Y., Zhong, Z., Croft, M., Jisrawi, N., Ignatov, A., and Tsakalakos, T.: In situ x-ray diffraction of prototype sodium metal halide cells: Time and space electrochemical profiling. J. Power Sources 196(4), 2332–2339 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, E., Marschilok, A., Takeuchi, K., Ignatov, A., Zhong, Z., and Croft, M.: Energy dispersive x-ray diffraction of lithium–silver vanadium phosphorous oxide cells: In situ cathode depth profiling of an electrochemical reduction–displacement reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1465–1470 (2013).Google Scholar
Gallaway, J.W., Erdonmez, C.K., Zhong, Z., Croft, M., Sviridov, L.A., Sholklapper, T.Z., Turney, D.E., Banerjee, S., and Steingart, D.A.: Real-time materials evolution visualized within intact cycling alkaline batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 2757–2764 (2014).Google Scholar
Thomlinson, W., Chapman, D., Gmür, N., and Lazarz, N.: The superconducting wiggler beamport at the National Synchrotron Light Source. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 266, 226–233 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojdyr, M.: Fityk: A general-purpose peak fitting program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 1126–1128 (2010).Google Scholar
Chung, F.H.: Quantitative interpretation of x-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. III. Simultaneous determination of a set of reference intensities. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 8, 17 (1975).Google Scholar
Calculated from FIZ#99861 (09/11/09) by Jade for FePO.Google Scholar
Calculated from FIZ#162282 (09/11/09) by Jade for LiFePO.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Paxton et al. supplementary material

Supplementary figure

Download Paxton et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 517.3 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Paxton supplementary material

Supplementary figure

Download Paxton supplementary material(Image)
Image 9.8 MB