Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:01:51.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuous precipitation of monodispersed colloidal particles. II. SiO2, Al(OH)3, and BaTiO3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Yie-Shein Her ,
Seung-Ho Lee  and
Egon Matijević
Yie-Shein Her
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials Processing, Clarkson University, Box 5814, Potsdam, New York 13699–5814
Seung-Ho Lee
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials Processing, Clarkson University, Box 5814, Potsdam, New York 13699–5814
Egon Matijević
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials Processing, Clarkson University, Box 5814, Potsdam, New York 13699–5814
Get access

Abstract

Colloidal spherical particles of SiO2, Al(OH)3, and BaTiO3 of narrow size distributions were produced in a continuous static mixer tubular reactor system. Several experimental parameters, including the flow rate, reaction temperature and time, reactant concentrations, and the dimensions of the reactor, were varied in order to establish the optimum conditions required for each material. The results were compared with those obtained in batch systems. Monodispersed colloids can be generated at a rate as high as 50 pounds per day using the described laboratory scale continuous reactor.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 156 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Matijević, E., Chem. Mater. 5, 412–426 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Matijević, E., Langmuir 10, 8–16 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kallay, N., Fischer, I., and Matijević, E., Colloids Surf. 13, 145–149 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ring, T. A., Chem. Engg. Sci. 39, 1731–1734 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Jean, J. H., Goy, D.M., and Ring, T.A., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 66, 1517–1520 (1987).Google Scholar
6.Ogihara, T., Iizuka, M., Yanagawa, T., Ogata, N., and Yoshida, K., J. Mater. Sci. 27, 55–62 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Her, Y-S., Matijević, E., and Wilcox, W. R., Powder Technol. 61, 173–177 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Stöber, W., Fink, A., and Bohn, E., J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 26, 62–69 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Giesche, H., Ph.D. dissertation, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, FRG (1987).Google Scholar
10.Hsu, W. P., Yu, R., and Matijević, E., J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 156, 56–65 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Brace, R. and Matijević, E., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 35, 3691–3705 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Willard, H. H. and Tang, N. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 59, 1190–1196 (1937).Google Scholar
13.Her, Y-S., Matijević, E., and Chon, M.C., J. Mater. Res. 12, 3106 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Matijević, E. and Her, Y-S., Process for the Synthesis of Crystalline Ceramic Powders of Perovskite Compounds, European Patent EP 641,740, March 8, 1995.Google Scholar