Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:29:44.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First principles investigation of hydrogen embrittlement in FeAl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

C.L. Fu
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6114
G.S. Painter
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6114
Get access

Abstract

The mechanism underlying the hydrogen-induced embrittlement effect in FeAl has been investigated using a local density functional total-energy approach. The bonding characteristics, the bond and cleavage strength between iron and aluminum layers, and the surface energy with and without interstitially absorbed H are calculated from first-principles band-structure and atomic-cluster methods. Our unique combination of techniques permits the simultaneous study of the metallic and localized bonding effects on an equal footing. Results from this study show that FeAl (in the absence of H) is intrinsically highly resistant to cleavage fracture in terms of the high theoretical cleavage strength. Hydrogen locally dilates the Fe–Al lattice, and this is accompanied by a sizable decrease in Fe–Al cleavage (or cohesive) strength. Our results suggest that the underlying mechanism of H-embrittlement in aluminides is a depletion of d-bonding charge on the Fe site resulting from the charge transfer from Fe to H. Results also indicate that the H-embrittlement effect is greater for H adsorbed in Fe-rich sites.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Liu, C. T., Lee, E. H., and McKamey, C. G., Scripta Metall. 23, 875 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Liu, C. T., McKamey, C. G., and Lee, E. H., Scripta Metall. 24, 385 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Liu, C. T. and George, E. P., Scripta Metall. 24, 1285 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Liu, C. T. and McKamey, C. G., in High Temperature Aluminides and Intermetallics, edited by Whang, S. H., Liu, C. T., Pope, D. P., and Stiegler, J. O. (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 1990), p. 133.Google Scholar
5 For example, see the review article by Williams, A. R. and Barth, U. von, in Theory of the Inhomogeneous Electron Gas, edited by Lundqvist, S. and March, N. H. (Plenum Press, New York, 1983), p. 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Wimmer, E., Krakauer, H., Weinert, M., and Freeman, A. J., Phys. Rev. B 24, 864 (1981); C. L. Fu, M. Weinert, and A. J. Freeman (unpublished research).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Painter, G. S. and Averill, F. W., Phys. Rev. B 28, 5536 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Fu, C. L., J. Mater. Res. 5, 971 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Painter, G. S. and Averill, F. W., Phys. Rev. B 39, 7522 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar