Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:47:41.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In situ hydrothermal synthesis of rGO-wrapped Fe1−xS particles for lithium storage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2019

Meng-Han Wang ,
Huai-Guo Xue  and
Sheng-Ping Guo Open the ORCID record for Sheng-Ping Guo [Opens in a new window]
Meng-Han Wang
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225002, China
Huai-Guo Xue
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225002, China
Sheng-Ping Guo*
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225002, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: spguo@yzu.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

Iron sulfides have attracted much interests for their potential as anode materials in energy storage devices in view of their low costs, and environmentally benign and high theoretical capacities. Among them, Fe1−xS is relatively rarely investigated. In this work, Fe1−xS@rGO has been synthesized using a facile in situ hydrothermal method. After wrapped by rGO, the morphology of Fe1−xS particles changes from hexagonal flakes to irregular particles with much smaller sizes. As the anode material for lithium ion batteries, Fe1−xS@rGO exhibits excellent lithium storage ability. It can deliver an initial discharge capacity of 1575.5 mA h/g in the potential window of 0.005–3 V, and a reversible capacity of 907.8 mA h/g can be maintained after 200 cycles at 100 mA/g. Its improved electrochemical performance can be attributed to the effect of enhanced contact area and shortened Li+ ion transport distance because of rGO’s contribution.

Keywords

Fe1−xSin situ hydrothermal synthesislithium ion batteriesanodeelectrochemical properties
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 34 , Issue 18 , 30 September 2019 , pp. 3186 - 3194
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Guo, S.P., Chi, Y., and Guo, G.C.: Recent achievements on middle and far-infrared second-order nonlinear optical materials. Coord. Chem. Rev. 335, 44 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, J.R., Yang, S.H., Feng, F., Xue, H.G., and Guo, S.P.: A review of the structural chemistry and physical properties of metal chalcogenide halides. Coord. Chem. Rev. 347, 23 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M.M., Xue, H.G., and Guo, S.P.: Multinary metal chalcogenides with tetrahedral structures for second-order nonlinear optical, photocatalytic, and photovoltaic applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 368, 115 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Q.T., Li, J.C., Xue, H.G., and Guo, S.P.: Binary iron sulfides as anode materials for rechargeable batteries: Crystal structures, syntheses, and electrochemical performance. J. Power Sources 379, 41 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerasubramani, G.K., Park, M.S., Choi, J.Y., Lee, Y.S., Kim, S.J., and Kim, D.W.: Rational combination of an alabandite MnS laminated pyrrhotite Fe1−xS nanocomposite as a superior anode material for high performance sodium-ion battery. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 7, 5921 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Fang, Y.J., Zhao, Z.W., Yuan, C.Z., and Lou, X.W.: A ternary Fe1−xS@Porous carbon nanowires/reduced graphene oxide hybrid film electrode with superior volumetric and gravimetric capacities for flexible sodium ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1970026 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Y., Day, T., Zhang, T.S., Liu, H.L., Shi, X., Chen, L.D., and Snyder, G.J.: High thermoelectric performance in non-toxic earth-abundant copper sulfide. Adv. Mater. 26, 3974 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, Z., Xue, H.G., and Guo, S.P.: Recent achievements on sulfide-type solid electrolytes: Crystal structures and electrochemical performance. J. Mater. Sci. 53, 3927 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, H.L., Mwizerwa, J.P., Qi, X.G., Liu, X., Xu, X.X., Li, H., Hu, Y.S., and Yao, X.Y.: Core–shell Fe1−x S@Na2.9PS3.95Se0.05 nanorods for room temperature all-solid-state sodium batteries with high energy density. ACS Nano 12, 2809 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, S.P., Li, J.C., Ma, Z., Chi, Y., and Xue, H.G.: A facile method to prepare the FeS/porous carbon composite as advanced anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Sci. 52, 2345 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, S.P., Li, J.C., Xiao, J.R., and Xue, H.G.: Fe3S4 nanoparticles wrapped in an rGO matrix for promising energy storage: Outstanding cyclic and rate performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 37694 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, K.L., Zhang, T.W., Liang, J.W., Zhu, Y.C., Lin, N., and Qian, Y.T.: A potential pyrrhotite (Fe7S8) anode material for lithium storage. RSC Adv. 5, 14828 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Q.N., Song, H., Zhuang, Q.Y., Liu, J., Zhang, Z.H., Mao, C.M., Peng, H.R., Li, G.C., and Chen, K.Z.: Iron–nitrogen–carbon species boosting fast conversion kinetics of Fe1−xS@C nanorods as high rate anodes for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 338, 726 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C.D., Lan, M.H., Zhang, Y., Bian, H.D., Yuen, M.F., Ostrikov, K., Jiang, J.J., Zhang, W.J., Li, Y.Y., and Lu, J.: Fe1−xS/C nanocomposites from sugarcane waste-derived microporous carbon for high-performance lithium ion batteries. Green Chem. 18, 3029 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S.J. and Ruoff, R.S.: Chemical methods for the production of graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 217 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J.C., Ma, Z., Chi, Y., and Guo, S.P.: The electrochemical properties of one-pot prepared Fe2SSe/porous carbon composite as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Sci. 52, 1573 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J.C., Xue, H.G., and Guo, S.P.: Facile synthesis, structure and first investigation of promising lithium storage ability for Fe2SiS4/porous carbon composite. Funct. Mater. Lett. 10, 1750054 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Q.T., Xue, H.G., and Guo, S.P.: FeS2 walnut-like microspheres wrapped with rGO as anode material for high-capacity and long-cycle lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 292, 1 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Q.T., Xue, H.G., and Guo, S.P.: Facile preparation of FeS@GO and its outstanding electrochemical performances for lithium storage. Inorg. Chem. Front. 5, 2540 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y.X., Chou, S.L., Liu, H.K., and Dou, S.X.: Reduced graphene oxide with superior cycling stability and rate capability for sodium storage. Carbon 57, 202 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, L., Yang, J., Chhowalla, M., and Loh, K.P.: Synthesis and reduction of large sized graphene oxide sheets. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 7306 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, X.L., Li, C.L., Yi, H.H., Wang, L.F., Yu, Q.J., Gao, F.Y., Cui, X.X., Chu, C., Li, J.Y., and Zhang, R.C.: Facile and fast synthesis of novel Mn2CoO4@ rGO catalysts for the NH3-SCR of NOx at low temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 333, 467 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Z., Zheng, J.L., Yue, Y.H., and Guo, L.: Highly stable rGO-wrapped Ni3S2 nanobowls: Structure fabrication and superior long-life electrochemical performance in LIBs. Nano Energy 11, 428 (2015).Google Scholar
Xie, J., Liu, S.Y., Cao, G.S., Zhu, T.J., and Zhao, X.B.: Self-assembly of CoS2/graphene nanoarchitecture by a facile one-pot route and its improved electrochemical Li-storage properties. Nano Energy 2, 49 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, J.Y., Gong, Y.J., Yang, S.B., Xiao, P., Zhang, Y.H., Keyshar, K., Ye, G.L., Ozden, S., Vajtai, R., and Ajayan, P.M.: CoMoO4 nanoparticles anchored on reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites as anodes for long-life lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 20414 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, Y.J., Fan, X.L., Suo, L.M., Luo, C., Gao, T., and Wang, C.S.: Electrospun FeS2@carbon fiber electrode as a high energy density cathode for rechargeable lithium batteries. ACS Nano 10, 1529 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Q.T., Li, J.C., Xue, H.G., and Guo, S.P.: Effective combination of FeS2 microspheres and Fe3S4 microcubes with rGO as anode material for high-capacity and long-cycle lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 396, 675 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabana, J., Monconduit, L., Larcher, D., and Palacin, M.R.: Beyond intercalation-based Li-ion batteries: The state of the art and challenges of electrode materials reacting through conversion reactions. Adv. Mater. 22, E170 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittingham, M.S.: Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chem. Rev. 104, 4217 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J., Wu, M.Q., Gong, F., Feng, T.T., Chen, C., and Liao, J.X.: Facile and controllable synthesis of solid Co3V2O8 micro-pencils as a highly efficient anode for Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 38, 24418 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, M.H., Subramaniyam, C.M., Murchison, A.J., and Goodenough, J.B.: Safe, high-voltage rechargeable cells of long cycle life. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 6343 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, Y., Hwang, J.Y., and Sun, Y.K.: Micro-intertexture carbon-free iron sulfides as advanced high tap density anodes for rechargeable batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 39416 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y.M., Hu, X.L., Luo, W., Xia, F.F., and Huang, Y.H.: Reconstruction of conformal nanoscale MnO on graphene as a high-capacity and long-life anode material for lithium ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 2436 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Y., Hwang, J.Y., Belharouak, I., and Sun, Y.K.: Na storage capability investigation of a carbon nanotube-encapsulated Fe1−xS composite. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 364 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, W.H., Song, K.M., Mi, L.W., Feng, X.M., Zhang, J.M., Cui, S.Z., and Liu, C.T.: Synergistic effect induced ultrafine SnO2/graphene nanocomposite as an advanced lithium/sodium-ion batteries anode. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 10027 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar