Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:27:18.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of MgO codoping on Er concentration in congruent LiNbO3 crystal: Mg threshold concentration effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

De-Long Zhang ,
Li-Zhu Zhang ,
Chao Xu ,
Liang Sun ,
Yu-Heng Xu  and
Edwin Yue-Bun Pun
De-Long Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Opto-electronics and Information Engineering, School of Precision Instruments and Opto-electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Optoelectronics Information and Technical Science (Tianjin University), Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China; and Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
Li-Zhu Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Opto-electronics and Information Engineering, School of Precision Instruments and Opto-electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, People's Republic of China
Yu-Heng Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China; and School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China
Edwin Yue-Bun Pun
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: dlzhang@tju.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

Congruent Er:Mg:LiNbO3 crystals were grown by the Czochralski method from the melts containing fixed 0.5 mol% Er2O3 while varied MgO content ranged from 0.0 to 8.0 mol%. The Mg and Er contents in the crystals were determined by neutron activation analysis. In the presence of Er codopant, the Mg threshold concentration with respect to optical damage is determined from the measured OH absorption spectra. The results show that the Er codopant has less effect on both the Mg threshold concentration and Mg segregation coefficient, which is within 1.13–1.23 as the Mg concentration is below the threshold while within 0.88–0.98 when above the threshold, consistent with the only MgO doping case. On the other hand, the practical Er concentration in the crystal is closely related to the Mg content and shows definite Mg threshold effect. Below the threshold, the Er concentration decreases linearly with the increased Mg concentration in the crystal; above the threshold, the decrease is more remarkable and follows another linear function. The Mg concentration effect on the Er segregation coefficient is discussed from the viewpoint of the Mg doping effect on the solubility of Er ions in the crystal.

Keywords

CrystalChemical compositionNeutron irradiation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , February 2010 , pp. 235 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Brinkmann, R., Sohler, W., Suche, H.Continuous-wave erbium-diffused LiNbO3 waveguide laser. Electron. Lett. 27, 415 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Becker, Ch., Oesselke, T., Pandavenes, J., Ricken, R., Rochhausen, K., Schreiberg, G., Sohler, W., Suche, H., Wessel, R., Balsamo, S., Montrosset, I., Sciancalepore, D.Advanced Ti:Er:LiNbO3 waveguide lasers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6, 101 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Amin, J., Aust, J.A., Sanford, N.A.Z-propagating waveguide lasers in rare-earth-doped Ti:LiNbO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3785 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Helmfrid, S., Arvidsson, G., Webjorn, J., Linnarsson, M., Pihl, T.Stimulated emission in Er:Ti:LiNbO3 waveguides close to 1.53 μm transition. Electron. Lett. 27, 913 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Huang, C.H., McCaughan, L.980-nm-pumped Er-doped LiNbO3 waveguide amplifiers: A comparison with 1484-nm pumping. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2, 367 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Cantelar, E., Torchia, G.A., Sanz-Garcia, J.A., Pernas, P.L., Lifante, G., Cusso, F.Red, green, and blue simultaneous generation in aperiodically poled Zn-diffused LiNbO3:Er3+/Yb3+ nonlinear channel waveguides. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2991 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Das, B.K., Ricken, R., Sohler, W.Integrated optical distributed feedback laser with Ti:Fe:Er:LiNbO3 waveguide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 1515 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Das, B.K., Ricken, R., Quiring, V., Suche, H., Sohler, W.Distributed feedback-distributed Bragg reflector coupled cavity laser with a Ti:(Fe:)Er:LiNbO3 waveguide. Opt. Lett. 29, 165 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Schreiber, G., Hofmann, D., Grundkotter, W., Lee, Y.L., Suche, H., Quiring, V., Ricken, R., Sohler, W.Nonlinear integrated optical frequency conversion in periodically poled Ti:LiNbO3 waveguides. Proc. SPIE 4277, 144 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Bryan, D.A., Gerson, R., Tomaschke, and H.E.Increased optical damage resistance in lithium niobate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 847 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sun, L., Li, A.H., Lü, Q., Guo, F.Y., Cai, W., Xu, Y.H., Zhao, L.C.Enhanced 1.5-μm emission and simultaneously suppressed green upconversion emission in Er:LiNbO3 crystals heavily codoped with MgO. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 071914 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Furukawa, Y., Kitamura, K., Takekawa, S., Miyamoto, A., Terao, M., Suda, N.Photorefraction in LiNbO3 as a function of [Li]/[Nb] and MgO concentrations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2494 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Péter, Á., Polgár, K., Kovács, L., Lengyel, K.Threshold concentration of MgO in near-stoichiometric LiNbO3 crystals. J. Cryst. Growth 284, 149 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Nakamura, M., Higuchi, S., Takekawa, S., Terabe, K., Furukawa, Y., Kitamura, K.Optical damage resistance and refractive indices in near-stoichiometric MgO-doped LiNbO3. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 41, L49 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lengyel, K., Péter, Á., Polgár, K., Kovács, L., Corradi, G.UV and IR absorption studies in LiNbO3:Mg crystals below and above the photorefractive threshold. Phys. Status Solidi C 2, 171 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hu, L.J., Chang, Y.H., Lin, I.N., Yang, S.J.Defects of lithium niobate crystals heavily doped with MgO. J. Cryst. Growth 114, 191 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Cantelar, E., Sanz-García, J.A., Cussó, F.Growth of LiNbO3 co-doped with Er3+/Yb3+. J. Cryst. Growth 205, 196 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Zhang, D.L., Yang, Q.Z., Sun, L., Xu, Y.H., Pun, E.Y.B.Transient characteristics of green upconversion emission of Er3+ in MgO:LiNbO3 crystal: Mg threshold concentration effect. Appl. Phys. B 35, 335 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Ju, J.J., Lee, M.H., Cha, M., Seo, H.J.Energy transfer in clustered sites of Er3+ ions in LiNbO3 crystals. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 1990 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Zhang, D.L., Hua, P.R., Pun, and E.Y.B.Er3+ diffusion in congruent LiNbO3 crystal doped with 4.5 mol% MgO. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 113513 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Baumann, I., Brinkmann, R., Dinand, M., Sohler, W., Beckers, L., Buchal, Ch., Fleuster, M., Holzbrecher, H., Paulus, H., Muller, K.H., Gog, Th., Materlik, G., Witte, O., Stolz, H., von der Osten, W.Erbium incorporation in LiNbO3 by diffusion-doping. Appl. Phys. A 64, 33 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar