Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:59:44.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Room temperature creep of fine-grained pure Mg: A direct comparison between nanoindentation and uniaxial tension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

C.L. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
T. Mukai
Affiliation:
Structural Metal Center, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan
T.G. Nieh*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: tnieh@utk.edu
Get access

Abstract

Nanoindentation creep and uniaxial tension were conducted on pure Mg with a grain size of about 2 μm at room temperature and the data were directly compared. Despite the differences in stress state, the two sets of data were found to match remarkably well with each other. An apparent stress exponent value of 4 was obtained and the deformation mechanism was discussed in light of dislocation slips and twinning in anisotropic Mg.

Keywords

Type
Rapid Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Li, J.C.M.: Impression creep and other localized tests. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 322, 23 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Li, H. and Ngan, A.H.W.: Size effects of nanoindentation creep. J. Mater. Res. 19, 513 (2004).Google Scholar
3.Tabor, D.S.: The Hardness of Metals (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1951), pp. 103107.Google Scholar
4.Mahmudi, R., Rezaee-Bazzaz, A., and Banaie-Fard, H.R.: Investigation of stress exponent in the room-temperature creep of Sn-40Pb-2.5Sb solder alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 429, 192 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Goodall, R. and Clyne, T.W.: A critical appraisal of the extraction of creep parameters from nanoindentation data obtained at room temperature. Acta Mater. 54, 5489 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Poisl, W.H., Oliver, W.C., and Fabes, B.D.: The relationship between indentation and uniaxial creep in amorphous selenium. J. Mater. Res. 10, 2024 (1995).Google Scholar
7.Miller, W.K.: Creep of die cast AZ91 magnesium at room temperature and low stress. Metall. Trans. 22, 873 (1991).Google Scholar
8.Koike, J.: Enhanced deformation mechanisms by anisotropic plasticity in polycrystalline Mg alloys at room temperature. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36, 1689 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Koike, J., Ohyama, R., Kobayashi, T., Suzuki, M., and Maruyama, K.: Grain-boundary sliding in AZ31 magnesium alloys at room temperature to 523K. Mater. Trans. 44, 445 (2003).Google Scholar
10.Kamado, S., Koike, J., Kondoh, K., and Kawamura, Y.: Magnesium research trend in Japan. Mater. Sci. Forum 419, 21 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Somekawa, H. and Mukai, T.: Effect of grain refinement on fracture toughness in extruded pure magnesium. Scr. Mater. 53, 1059 (2005).Google Scholar
12.Hill, R.: The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1950), p. 99.Google Scholar
13.Mabuchi, M., Kubota, K., and Higashi, K.: Tensile strength, ductility and fracture of magnesium-silicon alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 31, 1529 (1996).Google Scholar
14.Huang, D.M., Chen, Y.G., Tang, Y.B., Liu, H.M., and Niu, G.: Indentation creep behavior of AE42 and Ca-containing AE41 alloys. Mater. Lett. 61, 1015 (2007).Google Scholar
15.Weertman, J.: Dislocation climb theory of steady-state creep. ASM Trans. 61, 681 (1968).Google Scholar
16.Chuvil'deev, V.N., Nieh, T.G., Gryaznov, M.Y., Sysoev, V.I.A.N., and Kopylov, V.I.: Low-temperature superplasticity and internal friction in microcrystalline Mg alloys processed by ECAP. Scr. Mater. 50, 861 (2004).Google Scholar
17.Barnett, M.R.: Twinning and the ductility of magnesium alloys: Part I: “Tension” twins. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 464, 1 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Chino, Y., Kimura, K., and Mabuchi, M.: Twinning behavior and deformation mechanisms of extruded AZ31 Mg alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 486, 481 (2008).Google Scholar