Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T18:29:21.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of the effects of conical indentation variables on the indentation response of elastic–plastic materials through factorial design of experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Sara Aida Rodríguez Pulecio ,
María Cristina Moré Farias  and
Roberto Martins Souza
Sara Aida Rodríguez Pulecio*
Affiliation:
Surface Phenomena Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of São Paulo, 05508-900 São Paulo - SP. Brazil
María Cristina Moré Farias
Affiliation:
Surface Phenomena Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of São Paulo, 05508-900 São Paulo - SP. Brazil
Roberto Martins Souza
Affiliation:
Surface Phenomena Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of São Paulo, 05508-900 São Paulo - SP. Brazil
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: sara.pulecio@poli.usp.br
Get access

Abstract

In this work, the effects of conical indentation variables on the load–depth indentation curves were analyzed using finite element modeling and dimensional analysis. A factorial design 26 was used with the aim of quantifying the effects of the mechanical properties of the indented material and of the indenter geometry. Analysis was based on the input variables Y/E, R/hmax, n, θ, E, and hmax. The dimensional variables E and hmax were used such that each value of dimensionless Y/E was obtained with two different values of E and each value of dimensionless R/hmax was obtained with two different hmax values. A set of dimensionless functions was defined to analyze the effect of the input variables: Π1 = Pl/Eh2, Π2 = hc/h, Π3 = H/Y, Π4= S/Ehmax, Π6 = hmax/hf, and Π7 = Wp/WT. These six functions were found to depend only on the dimensionless variables studied (Y/E, R/hmax, n, θ). Another dimensionless function, Π5 = β, was not well defined for most of the dimensionless variables and the only variable that provided a significant effect on β was θ. However, β showed a strong dependence on the fraction of the data selected to fit the unloading curve, which means that β is especially susceptible to the error in the calculation of the initial unloading slope.

Keywords

NanoindentationSimulation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , March 2009 , pp. 1222 - 1234
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Instrumented Indentation Testing, 10th ed., ASM Handbook, Vol. 8, edited by Hay, J.L. and Pharr, G.M. (ASM, Materials Park, OH, 1990), pp. 232–243.Google Scholar
2.Li, X. and Bhushan, B.: A review of nanoindentation continuous stiffness measurement technique and its applications. Mater. Charact. 48, 11 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Fischer-Cripps, A.C.: A review of analysis methods for sub-micron indentation testing. Vacuum 58, 569 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Cheng, Y.T. and Cheng, C.M.: Further analysis of indentation loading curves: Effects of tip rounding on mechanical property measurements. J. Mater. Res. 13, 1059 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Meza, J.M., Abbes, F., and Troyon, M.: Penetration depth and tip radius dependence on the correction factor in nanoindentation measurements. J. Mater. Res. 23, 725 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Cheng, Y.T. and Cheng, C.M.: Effects of “sinking in” and “piling up” on estimating the contact area under load in indentation. Philos. Mag. Lett. 78, 115 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cheng, Y.T. and Cheng, C.M.: Relationships between hardness, elastic modulus, and the work of indentation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 614 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Dao, M., Chollacoop, N., Van Vliet, K.J., Venkatesh, T.A., and Suresh, S.: Computational modeling of the forward and reverse problems in instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Mater. 49, 3899 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Bucaille, J.L., Stauss, S., Felder, E., and Michler, J.: Determination of plastic properties of metals by instrumented indentation using different sharp indenters. Acta Mater. 51, 1663 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Cheng, Y.T. and Cheng, C.M.: Scaling, dimensional analysis, and indentation measurements Mater. Mater. Sci. Eng., R 44, 91 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Cheng, Y.T. and Cheng, C.M.: Scaling approach to conical indentation in elastic-plastic solids with work hardening. J. Appl. Phys. 84, 1284 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G., and Hunter, J.S.: Statistics for Experimenters. An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. 1st ed. (John Wiley, New York, 1978), pp. 117–434.Google Scholar
13.Bisch, C., Nadal, M., Teyssandier, F., Bancel, M., and Vallon, B.: Chemical vapor deposition of titanium carbide on WC-Co cemented carbides. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 202, 238 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Correa, J.R., Canetti, D., Castillo, R., Llópiz, J.C., and Dufour, J.: Influence of the precipitation pH of magnetite in the oxidation process to maghemite. Mater. Res. Bull. 41, 703 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Perrier, R.L., Safari, A., and Riman, R.E.: Experimental design applied to a low-temperature synthetic route to crystalline, sub-micron barium titanate zirconate powder. Mater. Res. Bull. 26, 1067 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Farias, M.C.M., Souza, R.M., Sinatora, A., and Tanaka, D.K.: The influence of applied load, sliding velocity and martensitic transformation on the unlubricated sliding wear of austenitic stainless steels. Wear 263, 773 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Moore, L.M., McKay, M.D., and Campbell, K.S.: Combined array experiment design. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Safety 91, 1281 (2006).Google Scholar
18.Calì, M., Santarelli, M.G.L., and Leone, P.: Computer experimental analysis of the CHP performance of a 100 kWe SOFC field unit by a factorial design. J. Power Sources 156, 400 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Jakobsson, N., Karlsson, D., Axelsson, J.P., Zacchi, G., and Nilsson, B.: Using computer simulation to assist in the robustness analysis of an ion-exchange chromatography step. J. Chromatogr., A 1063, 99 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Wang, X. and Dumas, G.A.: Evaluation of effects of selected factors on inter-vertebral fusion—A simulation study. Med. Eng. Phys. 27, 197 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Casals, O. and Alcalá, J.: Analytical and experimental resolutions in the duality of mechanical property extractions from instrumented indentation experiments: Comments on “On determination of material parameters from loading and unloading responses in nanoindentation with a single sharp indenter” by L. Wang and S.I. Rokhlin. [J. Mater. Res. 21, 995 (2006)]. J. Mater. Res. 22, 1138 (2007).Google Scholar
22.Rodriguez, S.A., Farias, M.C.M., and Souza, R.M.: Analysis of the tip roundness effects on the micro and macroindentation response of elastic-plastic materials. J. Mater. Res. 24, (2009, DOI: 10.1557/JMR.2009.0078).Google Scholar
23.Sneddon, I.N.: The relationship between load and penetration in the axisimetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47 (1965).Google Scholar
24.Hertz, H. and Angew, J.R.: On the contact of elastic solids. Math. 92, 156 (1881) (Translated and reprinted in English in Hertz's Miscellaneous Papers, Macmillan, London, 1896).Google Scholar
25.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Martin, M. and Troyon, M.: Fundamental relations used in nanoindentation: Critical examination based on experimental measurements. J. Mater. Res. 17, 2227 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.King, R.B.: Elastic analysis of some punch problems for a layered medium. Int. J. Solids Struct. 23, 1657 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Hay, J.C., Bolshakov, A., and Pharr, G.M.: A critical examination of the fundamental relations used in the analysis of nanoindentation data. J. Mater. Res. 14, 2296 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Hay, J.L. and Wolff, P.J.: Small correction required when applying the Hertzian contact model to instrumented indentation data. J. Mater. Res. 16, 1280 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Meza, J.M. and Cruz, J.: Tip roundness effect in mechanical properties measured by instrumented indentation. Sci. Teach. 36, 613 (2007).Google Scholar
31.Antunes, J.M., Menezes, L.F., and Fernandes, J.V.: Three-dimensional numerical simulation of Vickers indentation tests. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 784 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Troyon, M. and Huang, L.: Correction factor for contact area in nanoindentation measurements., J. Mater. Res. 20, 610 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Troyon, M. and Lafaye, S.: About the importance of introducing a correction factor in the Sneddon relationship for nanoindentation measurements. Philos. Mag. 86, 5299 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Cao, Y.P., Dao, M., and Lu, J.: A precise correcting method for the study of the superhard material using nanoindentation tests. J. Mater. Res. 22, 1255 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Mata, M. and Alcalá, J.: The role of friction on sharp indentation. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 52, 145 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Suresh, S. and Giannakopoulos, A.E.: A new method for estimating residual stresses by instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Mater. 46, 5755 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Fischer-Cripps, A.C.: Use of combined elastic modulus in depth-sensing indentation with a conical indenter. J. Mater. Res. 18, 1943 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Theory Manual 5.1–1, ABAQUS, version 6.7.Google Scholar
39.Meza, J.M., Moré, M.C., Souza, R.M., and Cruz, L.J.: Using the ratio: Maximum load over unload stiffness squared, P m/S u2, on the evaluation of machine stiffness and area function of blunt indenters on depth-sensing indentation equipment. Mater. Res. 10, 437 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Sacks, J., Schiller, S.B., and Welch, W.J.: Designs for computer experiments. Technometrics 31, 41 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Bouzakis, K.D., Michailidis, N., Hadjiyiannis, S., Skordaris, G., and Erkens, G.: The effect of specimen roughness and indenter tip geometry on the determination accuracy of thin hard coatings stress–strain laws by nanoindentation. Mater. Char. 49, 149 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Casals, O. and Alcalá, J.: The duality in mechanical property extractions from Vickers and Berkovich instrumented indentation experiments. Acta Mater. 53, 3545 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Cheng, Y.T. and Li, Z.: Hardness obtained from conical indentations with various cone angles. J. Mater. Res. 15, 2830 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Bolshakov, A. and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of pileup on the measurement of mechanical properties by load and depth-sensing indentation techniques. J. Mater. Res. 13, 1049 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar