Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:52:54.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annealing optimization for tin–lead eutectic solder by constitutive experiment and simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2017

Xu Long Open the ORCID record for Xu Long [Opens in a new window] ,
Shaobin Wang ,
Xu He  and
Yao Yao
Xu Long*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072,People’s Republic of China
Shaobin Wang
Affiliation:
School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072,People’s Republic of China
Xu He
Affiliation:
School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072,People’s Republic of China
Yao Yao*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072,People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: xulong@nwpu.edu.cn
b)e-mail: yaoy@nwpu.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

For Sn–Pb eutectic solder alloy, uniaxial tensile tests were conducted to dog-bone type specimens annealed at different temperatures (60–180 °C) and durations (2–48 h). Low strain rates ranging from 10−4 s−1 to 10−3 s−1 were applied to study the competition between creep and plasticity and also the rate dependent effect of annealing condition. It is found that the influence of annealing temperature on material properties is more than that of annealing duration. Higher temperature up to 180 °C generally leads to higher yield and ultimate stresses and ultimate strain of annealed specimens. The optimal annealing condition is suggested to be 180 °C for 6 h for stable and efficient improvements in both strength and ductility. By proposing a concise unified creep and plasticity constitutive model, the sensitivity to strain rate and annealing condition is quantified with consideration of both creep and hardening properties. Parameter calibration theoretically confirms the observed optimal annealing condition in experiments.

Keywords

solderingannealingstress/strain relationship
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 32 , Issue 16 , 28 August 2017 , pp. 3089 - 3099
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Osterman, M.: Being “RoHS Exempt” in a Pb-free world. Presented at the Capital SMTA Chapter Pb-free Tutorial Program (Electronic Products and Systems Center, Maryland, 2006).Google Scholar
Directive EU: European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2010 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment A7–0196/2010 (2010).Google Scholar
Turner, I.C., Dunn, B.D., and Barnes, C.: A study into the re-processing of pure tin termination finishes into tin–lead. Soldering Surf. Mt. Tech. 25(4), 218 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, B.D. and Mozdzen, G.: Tin oxide coverage on tin whisker surfaces, measurements and implications for electronic circuits. Soldering Surf. Mt. Tech. 26(3), 139 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ECSS-Q-ST-70–08C: Space Product Assurance: The Manual Soldering of High-reliability Electrical Connections (European Cooperation for Space Standardization, Noordwijk, 2009).Google Scholar
ECSS-Q-ST-70–38C: Space Product Assurance, High-reliability Soldering for Surface-mount and Mixed Technology (European Cooperation for Space Standardization, Noordwijk, 2008).Google Scholar
Rusinko, A.: Modeling the effect of DC on the creep of metals in terms of the synthetic theory of irrecoverable deformation. Mech. Mater. 93, 163 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G. and Chen, X.: Fatigue damage coupled constitutive model for 63Sn37Pb solder under proportional and non-proportional loading. Mech. Mater. 39(1), 11 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustafa, M., Suhling, J.C., and Lall, P.: Experimental determination of fatigue behavior of lead free solder joints in microelectronic packaging subjected to isothermal aging. Microelectron. Reliab. 56, 136 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochoa, F., Williams, J.J., and Chawla, N.: Effects of cooling rate on the microstructure and tensile behavior of a Sn–3.5 wt% Ag solder. J. Electron. Mater. 32(32), 1414 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, X., Chen, W., Yu, X., Li, Y., Liu, Y., and Min, Z.: Shear strengths and fracture behaviors of Cu/Sn37Pb/Cu soldered joints subjected to different displacement rates. J. Alloys Compd. 600, 13 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K.S., Huh, S.H., and Suganuma, K.: Effects of cooling speed on microstructure and tensile properties of Sn–Ag–Cu alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 333(1–2), 106 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vianco, P., Rejent, J., Zender, G., and Kilgo, A.: Kinetics of Pb-rich phase particle coarsening in Sn–Pb solder under isothermal annealing–cooling rate dependence. J. Mater. Res. 20(6), 1563 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T.Y., Choi, W.J., Tu, K.N., Jang, J.W., Kuo, S.M., Lin, J.K., Frear, D.R., Zeng, K., and Kivilahti, J.K.: Morphology, kinetics, and thermodynamics of solid-state aging of eutectic SnPb and Pb-free solders (Sn–3.5Ag, Sn–3.8Ag–0.7Cu and Sn–0.7Cu) on Cu. J. Mater. Res. 17(2), 291 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohguchi, K.I. and Kurosawa, K.: An evaluation method for tensile characteristics of Cu/Sn IMCs using miniature composite solder specimen. J. Electron. Mater. 45(6), 3183 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuang, C.M., Lui, T.S., and Chen, L.H.: Effect of lead content on vibration fracture behavior of Pb–Sn eutectic solder. J. Mater. Res. 16(9), 2644 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, K. and Conrad, H.: Microstructure coarsening during static annealing of 60Sn40Pb solder joints: I stereology. J. Electron. Mater. 30(10), 1294 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanathan, L.N., Jang, J.W., Lin, J.K., and Frear, D.R.: Solid-state annealing behavior of two high-Pb solders, 95Pb5Sn and 90Pb10Sn, on Cu under bump metallurgy. J. Electron. Mater. 34(10), L43 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, J-W., De Silva, A.P., Lin, J-K., and Frear, D.R.: Tensile fracture behaviors of solid-state-annealed eutectic SnPb and lead-free solder flip chip bumps. J. Mater. Res. 19(6), 1826 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Ou, S., Tu, K.N., Zeng, K., and Dunne, R.: Measurement of impact toughness of eutectic SnPb and SnAgCu solder joints in ball grid array by mini-impact tester. J. Mater. Res. 23(5), 1482 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawashima, K., Ito, T., and Sakuragi, M.: Strain-rate and temperature-dependent stress–strain curves of Sn–Pb eutectic alloy. J. Mater. Sci. 27(23), 6387 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nose, H., Sakane, M., Tsukada, Y., and Nishimura, H.: Temperature and strain rate effects on tensile strength and inelastic constitutive relationship of Sn–Pb solders. J. Electron. Packag. 125(1), 59 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shohji, I., Yoshida, T., Takahashi, T., and Hioki, S.: Comparison of low-melting lead-free solders in tensile properties with Sn–Pb eutectic solder. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 15(4), 219 (2004).Google Scholar
Shohji, I., Yoshida, T., Takahashi, T., and Hioki, S.: Tensile properties of Sn–Ag based lead-free solders and strain rate sensitivity. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 366(1), 50 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Chen, X., Nose, H., and Sakane, M.: Stress–strain behaviors of 63Sn37Pb solder simulated by anand model. J. Mech. Strength 26(4), 447 (2004).Google Scholar
Chen, X., Jin, D., Sakane, M., and Yamamoto, T.: Multiaxial low-cycle fatigue of 63Sn–37Pb solder. J. Electron. Mater. 34(1), L1 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, R. and Yang, F.: Electrocontact heating in a Sn60Pb40 solder alloy. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41(41), 3142 (2008).Google Scholar
Chen, R. and Yang, F.: Impression creep of a Sn60Pb40 alloy: The effect of electric current. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41(15), 1525 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xuan, F.Z., Shao, S.S., and Chen, Q.Q.: Synthesis creep behavior of Sn63Pb37 under the applied stress and electric current. Microelectron. Reliab. 51(12), 2336 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtony, T., Szakál, A., Almásy, L., Len, A., Kugler, S., Bonyár, A., and Gordon, P.: Characterization of the microstructure of tin–silver lead free solder. J. Alloys Compd. 672, 13 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W., Felton, L.E., and Messler, R.W.: The effect of soldering process variables on the microstructure and mechanical properties of eutectic Sn–Ag/Cu solder joints. J. Electron. Mater. 24(10), 1465 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, K.M., Kripesh, V., and Tay, A.A.O.: Influence of single-wall carbon nanotube addition on the microstructural and tensile properties of Sn–Pb solder alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 455(1–2), 148 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Xu, D., Liu, H., Zhou, H., Mai, Y., Yang, J., and Li, E.: Effects of thermal residual stress on interfacial properties of polyphenylene sulphide/carbon fibre (PPS/CF) composite by microbond test. J. Mater. Sci. 51(1), 334 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annual Book of ASTM Standards: Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials (American Association State, Pennsylvania, 2009).Google Scholar
McDowell, D.L., Miller, M.P., and Brooks, D.C.: A unified creep-plasticity theory for solder alloys. In Fatigue of Electronic Materials. (ASTM International, Philadelphia, 1994).Google Scholar
Yao, Y., Keer, L.M., and Fine, M.E.: Modeling the failure of intermetallic/solder interfaces. Intermetallics 18(8), 1603 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, Y., Xu, H., Keer, L.M., and Fine, M.E.: A continuum damage mechanics-based unified creep and plasticity model for solder materials. Acta Mater. 83, 160 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp.: ABAQUS 6.14–4 (Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Rhode Island, 2014).Google Scholar