Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:59:14.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomic layer deposition (ALD) of subnanometer inorganic layers on natural cotton to enhance oil sorption performance in marine environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2019

Andrew E. Short
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
Srikar V. Pamidi
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
Zachary E. Bloomberg
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
Yi Li
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
Mark D. Losego*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: losego@gatech.edu
Get access

Abstract

More than 1 million tons of oil is inadvertently spilled each year. The economic and environmental costs of these spills are enormous and compel further development of environmentally friendly sorbent materials. Here, we demonstrate a vapor-phase modification approach to create a new class of oil sorbents composed of cellulosic materials (cotton) coated with a subnanometer layer of inorganic oxide. This new cellulosic sorbent remains buoyant in water indefinitely and achieves a selective oil sorption capacity (23 g/g or 1.05 g/cm3) that is at least 35 times better than untreated cellulose in aqueous environments. This new sorbent particularly excels under “realistic” conditions such as continuous agitation (e.g., simulated waves) and presoaking in water (e.g., rain or forced immersion). When sorption performance is compared on a per-volume basis—which better captures use conditions than a per-mass basis—this modified natural product becomes comparable to the best sorbents reported in the literature.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carson, R.T., Mitchell, R.C., Hanemann, M., Kopp, R.J., Presser, S., and Ruud, P.A.: Contingent valuation and lost passive use: Damages from the exxon valdez oil spill. Environ. Resour. Econ. 25, 257 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A.H.: Oil spills and risk perceptions. In Oil Spill Science and Technology, 2nd ed., Fingas, M., ed. (Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, TX, 2017); ch. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
Peterson, C.H., Rice, S.D., Short, J.W., Esler, D., Bodkin, J.L., Ballachey, B.E., and Irons, D.B.: Long-term ecosystem response to the exxon valdez oil spill. Science 302, 2082 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jernelöv, A.: Ixtoc I: A case study of the world’s largest oil spill. Ambio 10, 299 (1981).Google Scholar
Dave, D. and Ghaly, A.E.: Remediation technologies for marine oil spills: A critical review and comparative analysis. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 7, 424 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ITOPF: Use of sorbent materials in oil spill response (2014). Available at: http://www.itopf.com/knowledge-resources/documents-guides/document/tip-8-use-of-sorbent-materials-in-oil-spill-response/ (accessed May 22, 2017).Google Scholar
Federici, C. and Mintz, J.: Oil properties and their impact on spill response options (2014). Available at: https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/osrr-oil-spill-response-research/1017aa.pdf (accessed April 18, 2017).Google Scholar
Ge, J., Zhao, H.Y., Zhu, H.W., Huang, J., Shi, L.A., and Yu, S.H.: Advanced sorbents for oil-spill cleanup: Recent advances and future perspectives. Adv. Mater. 28, 10459 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, S., Peng, X.W., Zhong, L.X., Tan, J.W., Jing, S.S., Cao, X.F., Chen, W., Liu, C.F., and Sun, R.C.: An ultralight, elastic, cost-effective, and highly recyclable superabsorbent from microfibrillated cellulose fibers for oil spillage cleanup. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 8772 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, L.H., Hao, G.Z., Xiao, L., Yin, Q.S., Xia, M.T., and Jiang, W.: Robust magnetic polystyrene foam for high efficiency and removal oil from water surface. Sep. Purif. Technol. 173, 121 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sai, H., Fu, R., Xing, L., Xiang, J., Li, Z., Li, F., and Zhang, T.: Surface modification of bacterial cellulose aerogels’ web-like skeleton for oil/water separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 7373 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, A.M.E., Libera, J., Elam, J.W., and Darling, S.: Advanced oil sorbents using sequential infiltration synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. A, 5, 29292935 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, J., Nguyen, S.T., Fan, Z., and Duong, H.M.: Advanced fabrication and oil absorption properties of super-hydrophobic recycled cellulose aerogels. Chem. Eng. J. 270, 168 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cojocaru, C., Pricop, L., Samoila, P., Rotaru, R., and Harabagiu, V.: Surface hydrophobization of polyester fibers with poly(methylhydro-dimethyl)siloxane copolymers: Experimental design for testing of modified nonwoven materials as oil spill sorbents. Polym. Test. 59, 377 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K., Jur, J.S., Kim, D.H., and Parsons, G.N.: Mechanisms for hydrophilic/hydrophobic wetting transitions on cellulose cotton fibers coated using Al2O3 atomic layer deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 30, 01A163 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. International: ASTM F726-12: Standard Test Method for Sorbent Performance of Adsorbents (2012); p. 6.Google Scholar
Gregorczyk, K.E., Pickup, D.F., Sanz, M.G., Irakulis, I.A., Rogero, C., and Knez, M.: Tuning the tensile strength of cellulose through vapor-phase metalation. Chem. Mater. 27, 181 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carchini, G., Garcia-Melchor, M., Lodziana, Z., and Lopez, N.: Understanding and tuning the intrinsic hydrophobicity of rare earth oxides: A DFT plus U study. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 152 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Y.S. and McKay, G.: A comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 76, 332 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirel, Y.T., Yati, I., Donmez, R., and Sonmez, H.B.: Clean-up of oily liquids, fuels and organic solvents from the contaminated water fields using poly(propylene glycol) based organogels. Chem. Eng. J. 312, 126 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, G., Maunaye, M., and Martin, G.: Removal of heavy metals from waters by means of natural zeolites. Water Res. 18, 1501 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Y.S. and McKay, G.: Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 34, 451 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, H.N., You, S-J., Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A., and Chao, H-P.: Mistakes and inconsistencies regarding adsorption of contaminants from aqueous solutions. A critical review. Water Res. 120, 88 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Khaiary, M.I., Malash, G.F., and Ho, Y-S.: On the use of linearized pseudo-second-order kinetic equations for modeling adsorption systems. Desalination 257, 93 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plazinski, W., Rudzinski, W., and Plazinska, A.: Theoretical models of sorption kinetics including a surface reaction mechanism: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 152, 2 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UPS: How to determine billable weight (2017). Available at: https://www.ups.com/content/us/en/resources/ship/packaging/dim_weight.html (accessed March 24, 2017).Google Scholar
Wang, D., McLaughlin, E., Pfeffer, R., and Lin, Y.S.: Adsorption of oils from pure liquid and oil–water emulsion on hydrophobic silica aerogels. Sep. Purif. Technol. 99, 28 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bi, H., Huang, X., Wu, X., Cao, X., Tan, C., Yin, Z., Lu, X., Sun, L., and Zhang, H.: Carbon microbelt aerogel prepared by waste paper: An efficient and recyclable sorbent for oils and organic solvents. Small 10, 3544 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karatum, O., Steiner, S.A., Griffin, J.S., Shi, W.B., and Plata, D.L.: Flexible, mechanically durable aerogel composites for oil capture and recovery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 215 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Standeker, S., Novak, Z., and Knez, Z.: Adsorption of toxic organic compounds from water with hydrophobic silica aerogels. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 310, 362 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Y., Hu, C., Hu, Y., Cheng, H., Shi, G., and Qu, L.: A versatile, ultralight, nitrogen-doped graphene framework. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 51, 11371 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, S., Feng, J., Le, N., Le, A., Hoang, N., Tan, V., and Duong, H.: Cellulose aerogel from paper waste for crude oil spill cleaning. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 18386 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanobe, V.O.A., Sydenstricker, T.H.D., Amico, S.C., Vargas, J.V.C., and Zawadzki, S.F.: Evaluation of flexible postconsumed polyurethane foams modified by polystyrene grafting as sorbent material for oil spills. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 111, 1842 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, J.T., Kettunen, M., Ras, R.H.A., and Ikkala, O.: Hydrophobic nanocellulose aerogels as floating, sustainable, reusable, and recyclable oil absorbents. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3, 1813 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venkateswara Rao, A., Hegde, N.D., and Hirashima, H.: Absorption and desorption of organic liquids in elastic superhydrophobic silica aerogels. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 305, 124 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gui, X.C., Wei, J.Q., Wang, K.L., Cao, A.Y., Zhu, H.W., Jia, Y., Shu, Q.K., and Wu, D.H.: Carbon nanotube sponges. Adv. Mater. 22, 617 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, N. and Pan, Q.M.: Versatile fabrication of ultralight magnetic foams and application for oil-water separation. ACS Nano 7, 6875 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Short et al. supplementary material

Short et al. supplementary material 1

Download Short et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 11.6 MB

Short et al. supplementary material

Short et al. supplementary material 2

Download Short et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 5 MB

Short et al. supplementary material

Short et al. supplementary material 3

Download Short et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 9.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Short et al. supplementary material

Short et al. supplementary material 4

Download Short et al. supplementary material(File)
File 17.5 MB