Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:57:57.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compression deformation behavior of semisolid Al2O3np reinforced 7075 aluminum matrix composites with high solid fraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2016

Xiuliang Zou ,
Hong Yan  and
Xiaohui Chen
Xiuliang Zou
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China; and Key Laboratory of Light Alloy Preparation & Processing in Nanchang City, Nanchang 330031, China
Hong Yan*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China; and Key Laboratory of Light Alloy Preparation & Processing in Nanchang City, Nanchang 330031, China
Xiaohui Chen
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China; and Key Laboratory of Light Alloy Preparation & Processing in Nanchang City, Nanchang 330031, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: yanhong_wh@163.com
Get access

Abstract

Semisolid forging is a type of semisolid metal processing with high solid fraction. However, the presence of nanosized particles has strong influences on flow behavior of the composites in the semisolid forging process. In this study, the compression deformation behavior of nanosized Al2O3 particles (Al2O3np) reinforced 7075 aluminum matrix composites with high solid fraction was investigated by conducting semisolid isothermal compression experiment. The microstructures after semisolid compression were characterized. The results showed that the true stress decreased with the increase of the deformation temperature and size of Al2O3np, the decrease of the strain rate and mass fraction of Al2O3np. After semisolid compression, deformation degree in large deformation zone was larger than that in free deformation zone. Besides, the solid grains in large deformation zone showed evidence of having undergone different degrees of plastic deformation under different deformation conditions. Simultaneously, the deformation mechanisms during the semisolid compression process were discussed.

Keywords

semisolid forgingaluminum matrix compositesnanosized Al2O3 particlescompression deformation behaviordeformation mechanisms
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 31 , Issue 24 , 28 December 2016 , pp. 3981 - 3990
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abolhasani, D., Ezatpour, H.R., Sajjadi, S.A., and Abolhasani, Q.: Microstructure and mechanical properties evolution of 6061 aluminum alloy formed by forward thixoextrusion process. Mater. Des. 49, 784–790 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogal, Ł., Dutkiewicz, J., Atkinson, H.V., Lityńska-Dobrzyńska, L., Czeppe, T., and Modigell, M.: Characterization of semi-solid processing of aluminium alloy 7075 with Sc and Zr additions. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 580, 362–373 (2013).Google Scholar
Hassas-Irani, S.B., Zarei-Hanzaki, A., Bazaz, B., and Roostaei, A.A.: Microstructure evolution and semi-solid deformation behavior of an A356 aluminum alloy processed by strain induced melt activated method. Mater. Des. 46, 579–587 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, T.W., Kim, S.K., Ha, H.S., Kim, M.G., Lee, D.B., and Kim, Y.J.: Microstructural evolution and semisolid forming of SiC particulate reinforced AZ91HP magnesium composites. Mater. Sci. Technol. 16, 887–892 (2013).Google Scholar
Bolouri, A., Shahmiri, M., and Cheshmeh, E.N.H.: Microstructural evolution during semisolid state strain induced melt activation process of aluminum 7075 alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 20, 1663–1671 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, T.J., Hao, Y., and Sun, J.: Effects of compression parameters on deformation behaviors of semi-solid ZA27 alloys. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., Mater. Sci. Ed. 18, 9–14 (2003).Google Scholar
Choi, J.C., Park, H.J., and Kim, B.M.: The influence of induction heating on the microstructure of A356 for semi-solid forging. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 87, 46–52 (1999).Google Scholar
Lu, Y.L., Li, M.Q., Huang, W.C., and Jiang, H.T.: Deformation behavior and microstructural evolution during the semi-solid compression of Al–4Cu–Mg alloy. Mater. Charact. 54, 423–430 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y.N., Wang, J., Wei, J.F., and Zhao, Y.Q.: The compressive deformation behavior and deformation mechanism of Ti14 alloy in semi-solid State. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., Mater. Sci. Ed. 29, 143–147 (2014).Google Scholar
Li, J.Y., Sugiyama, S., and Yanagimoto, J.: Microstructural evolution and flow stress of semi-solid type 304 stainless steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 161, 396–406 (2005).Google Scholar
Thanh, L.N. and Suéry, M.: Microstructure and compression behaviour in the semisolid state of short-fibre-reinforced A356 aluminium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 196, 33–44 (1995).Google Scholar
Chen, X.H. and Yan, H.: Fabrication of nanosized Al2O3 reinforced aluminum matrix composites by subtype multifrequency ultrasonic vibration. J. Mater. Res. 30, 2197–2209 (2015).Google Scholar
Srivastava, M., Grips, V.K.W., and Rajam, K.S.: Electrochemical deposition and tribological behaviour of Ni and Ni–Co metal matrix composites with SiC nano-particles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 3814–3824 (2007).Google Scholar
Chen, X.H. and Yan, H.: Solid–liquid interface dynamics during solidification of Al 7075–Al2O3np based metal matrix composites. Mater. Des. 94, 148–158 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J. and Wang, Y.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of the rheoformed cylindrical part of 7075 aluminum matrix composite reinforced with nano-sized SiC particles. Mater. Des. 79, 32–41 (2015).Google Scholar
Kandemir, S., Atkinson, H.V., Weston, D.P., and Hainsworth, S.V.: Thixoforming of A356/SiC and A356/TiB nanocomposites fabricated by a combination of green compact nanoparticle incorporation and ultrasonic treatment of the melted compact. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 45, 5782–5798 (2014).Google Scholar
Youn, S.W., Kang, C.G., and Seo, P.K.: Mechanical characteristics evaluation of hollow shape part with metal matrix composites fabricated by thixoforging process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 130, 574–580 (2002).Google Scholar
Koker, R., Altinkok, N., and Demir, A.: Neural network based prediction of mechanical properties of particulate reinforced metal matrix composites using various training algorithms. Mater. Des. 28, 616–627 (2007).Google Scholar
Yan, H., Rao, Y., and He, R.: Morphological evolution of semi-solid Mg2Si/AM60 magnesium matrix composite produced by ultrasonic vibration process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214, 612–619 (2014).Google Scholar
Kang, C.G., Choi, J.S., and Kim, K.H.: The effect of strain rate on macroscopic behavior in the compression forming of semi-solid aluminum alloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 88, 159–168 (1999).Google Scholar
Nguyen, T.G., SuéRy, M., and Favier, D.: Influence of SiC particle volume fraction on the compressive behaviour of partially remelted Al, Si-based composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 183, 157–167 (1994).Google Scholar
Yan, H. and Wang, J.J.: Thixotropic compression deformation behavior of SiCp/AZ61 magnesium matrix composites. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 20, 811–814 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C.P. and Tsao, C.Y.A.: Semi-solid deformation of non-dendritic structures—I. Phenomenological behavior. Acta Mater. 45, 1955–1968 (1997).Google Scholar
Shang, S.Z., Lu, G.M., Tang, X.L., Zhao, Z.X., and Wu, C.M.: Deformation mechanism and forming properties of 6061Al alloys during compression in semi-solid state. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 20, 1725–1730 (2010).Google Scholar