Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:49:36.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controllable 3D morphology and growth mechanism of quasicrystalline phase in directionally solidified Al–Mn–Be alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2014

Huijun Kang ,
Tongmin Wang ,
Yiping Lu ,
Jinchuan Jie ,
Xinzhong Li ,
Yanqing Su  and
Jingjie Guo
Huijun Kang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
Tongmin Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
Yiping Lu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
Jinchuan Jie
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
Xinzhong Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Yanqing Su
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Jingjie Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: tmwang@dlut.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) morphological evolution and growth mechanisms of primary I-phase particles have been investigated in directionally solidified Al–6Mn–2.5Be (wt%) alloy at a wide range of growth rates (100–1500 μm/s). At relatively low growth rates (100–600 μm/s), the I-phase particles exhibit faceted growth with strong anisotropy, forming a hierarchical flower-like aggregate with icosahedral morphological symmetry composed of several attached irregular polyhedrons or pentagonal dodecahedrons. At higher growth rates (e.g., 1000 μm/s), the interface of the I-phases becomes unstable along the edges and corners of the pentagonal dodecahedron, thereby arousing growth perturbations. Correspondingly, a transition from faceted to nonfaceted growth occurs with increasing growth rate. Further increase of the growth rate leads to the formation of I-phase columnar dendrites' preferential growth along the 3-fold axis. The configurations of the flower-like aggregates can be adequately illustrated by a geometrical model in terms of the perfect and elongated pentagonal dodecahedrons. A growth mechanism for the flower-like aggregates has been proposed based on the clear understanding of the 3D morphological evolution of the I-phase particles.

Keywords

Al–Mn–Be alloysquasicrystaldirectional solidification3D morphologycrystal growth
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 29 , Issue 21 , 14 November 2014 , pp. 2547 - 2555
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D., and Cahn, J.W.: Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951 (1984).Google Scholar
Abe, E., Yan, Y., and Pennycook, S.J.: Quasicrystals as cluster aggregates. Nat. Mater. 3, 759 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, A.P.: Discovery of stable icosahedral quasicrystals: Progress in understanding structure and properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 5352 (2013).Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Wang, D.H., and Kuo, K.H.: Quasicrystals, crystalline phases, and multiple twins in rapidly solidified Al-Cr alloys. Phys. Rev. B 37, 6220 (1988).Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Arnberg, L., Lehtinen, B., Oguchi, M., and Masumoto, T.: Compositional analysis of the icosahedral phase in rapidly quenched Al-Mn and Al-V alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 17, 1657 (1986).Google Scholar
Sugawara, T., Edagawa, K., Oda, K., Seki, F., Ito, K., Ino, H., Kimura, K., and Takeuchi, S.: Crystallographic texture of melt-spun Al-Mn based and Al-Li-Cu icosahedral quasicrystals. Scr. Metall. 23, 711 (1989).Google Scholar
Dubost, B., Lang, J.M., Tanaka, M., Sainfort, P., and Audier, M.: Large AlCuLi single quasicrystals with triacontahedral solidification morphology. Nature 324, 48 (1986).Google Scholar
Tsai, A.P., Niikura, A., Inoue, A., and Masumoto, T.: Stoichiometric icosahedral phase in the Zn-Mg-Y system. J. Mater. Res. 12, 1468 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiraga, K.: High-resolution electron microscopy of quasicrystals. MRS Proc. 139, 125 (1989).Google Scholar
Luo, Z., Zhang, S., Tang, Y., and Zhao, D.: Quasicrystals in as-cast Mg-Zn-RE alloys. Scr. Metall. Mater. 28, 1513 (1993).Google Scholar
Kang, H., Wu, S., Li, X., Guo, J., and Wang, Y.: Improvement of microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg–8Gd–3Y by adding Mg3Zn6Y icosahedral phase alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 5585 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A., Nakamura, M., Watanabe, M., Kato, A., and Tsai, A.P.: Quasicrystal strengthened Mg–Zn–Y alloys by extrusion. Scr. Mater. 49, 417 (2003).Google Scholar
Schurack, F., Eckert, J., and Schultz, L.: Synthesis and mechanical properties of cast quasicrystal-reinforced Al-alloys. Acta Mater. 49, 1351 (2001).Google Scholar
Yuan, G., Amiya, K., Kato, H., and Inoue, A.: Structure and mechanical properties of cast quasicrystal-reinforced Mg–Zn–Al–Y base alloys. J. Mater. Res. 19, 1531 (2004).Google Scholar
Inoue, A. and Kimura, H.: High-strength aluminum alloys containing nanoquasicrystalline particles. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 286, 1 (2000).Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Kimura, H.M., Sasamori, K., and Masumoto, T.: Ultrahigh strength of rapidly solidified Al96-xCr3Ce1Cox (x=1, 1.5 and 2%) alloys containing an icosahedral phase as a main component. Mater. Trans. JIM 35, 85 (1994).Google Scholar
Bae, D.H., Kim, S.H., Kim, D.H., and Kim, W.T.: Deformation behavior of Mg–Zn–Y alloys reinforced by icosahedral quasicrystalline particles. Acta Mater. 50, 2343 (2002).Google Scholar
Bae, D.H., Lee, M.H., Kim, K.T., Kim, W.T., and Kim, D.H.: Application of quasicrystalline particles as a strengthening phase in Mg–Zn–Y alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 342, 445 (2002).Google Scholar
Kang, H., Wang, T., Li, X., Su, Y., Guo, J., and Fu, H.: Faceted-nonfaceted growth transition and 3-D morphological evolution of primary Al6Mn microcrystals in directionally solidified Al-3at.%Mn alloy. J. Mater. Res. 29, 1256 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. and Wang, H.M.: Growth morphologies and mechanisms of non-equilibrium solidified MC carbide. J. Mater. Res. 21, 375 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhakaran, G. and Murugan, R.: Synthesis of Cu2O microcrystals with morphological evolution from octahedral to microrod through a simple surfactant-free chemical route. CrystEngComm 14, 8338 (2012).Google Scholar
Erce-Montilla, R., PiÑero, M., Rosa-Fox, N.d.l., Santos, A., and Esquivias, L.: Control growth of PbS quantum dots doped sono-ormosil. J. Mater. Res. 16, 2572 (2001).Google Scholar
Bancel, P.A., Heiney, P.A., Stephens, P.W., Goldman, A.I., and Horn, P.M.: Structure of rapidly quenched Al-Mn. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2422 (1985).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelton, K.F.: Quasicrystals: Structure and stability. Int. Mater. Rev. 38, 105 (1993).Google Scholar
Ho, T.L., Jaszczak, J.A., Li, Y.H., and Saam, W.F.: Faceting in bond-oriented glasses and quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1116 (1987).Google Scholar
Ingersent, K. and Steinhardt, P.J.: Equilibrium faceting shapes for quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. B 39, 980 (1989).Google Scholar
Kim, S.H., Song, G.S., Fleury, E., Chattopadhyay, K., Kim, W.T., and Kim, D.H.: Icosahedral quasicrystalline and hexagonal approximant phases in the Al-Mn-Be alloy system. Philos. Mag. A 82, 1495 (2002).Google Scholar
Song, G.S., Fleury, E., Kim, S.H., Kim, W.T., and Kim, D.H.: Enhancement of the quasicrystal-forming ability in Al-based alloys by Be-addition. J. Alloys Compd. 342, 251 (2002).Google Scholar
Song, G.S., Fleury, E., Kim, S.H., Kim, W.T., and Kim, D.H.: Formation and stability of quasicrystalline and hexagonal approximant phases in an Al–Mn–Be Alloy. J. Mater. Res. 17, 1671 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zupanič, F., Bončina, T., Križman, A., Grogger, W., Gspan, C., Markoli, B., and Spaić, S.: Quasicrystalline phase in melt-spun Al–Mn–Be ribbons. J. Alloys Compd. 452, 343 (2008).Google Scholar
Zupanič, F., Bončina, T., Šuštaršič, B., Anžel, I., and Markoli, B.: Microstructure of Al–Mn–Be melt-spun ribbons. Mater. Charact. 59, 1245 (2008).Google Scholar
Kang, H., Li, X., Wang, T., Liu, D., Su, Y., Hu, Z., Guo, J., and Fu, H.: Crystal–quasicrystal transition depending on cooling rates in directionally solidified Al–3Mn–7Be (at.%) alloy. Intermetallics 44, 101 (2014).Google Scholar
Raynor, G.V., Faulkner, C.R., Noden, J.D., and Harding, A.R.: Ternary alloys formed by aluminium, transitional metals and divalent metals. Acta Metall. 1, 629 (1953).Google Scholar
Zupanič, F., Markoli, B., Naglič, I., Weingärtner, T., Meden, A., and Bončina, T.: Phases in the Al-corner of the Al–Mn–Be system. Microsc. Microanal. 19, 1308 (2013).Google Scholar
BonČIna, T., Markoli, B., and ZupaniČ, F.: Characterization of cast Al86Mn3Be11 alloy. J. Microsc. 233, 364 (2009).Google Scholar
Tsai, A.P., Niikura, A., Inoue, A., Masumoto, T., Nishida, Y., Tsuda, K., and Tanaka, M.: Highly ordered structure of icosahedral quasicrystals in Zn-Mg-RE (RE ≡ rare earth metals) systems. Philos. Mag. Lett. 70, 169 (1994).Google Scholar
Nissen, H.U., Wessicken, R., Beeli, C., and Csanady, A.: Al-Mn quasicrystal aggregates with icosahedral morphological symmetry. Philos. Mag. B 57, 587 (1988).Google Scholar
Sekerka, R.F.: Theory of crystal growth morphology. In Crystal Growth – From Fundamentals to Technology, Müller, G., Métois, J. J., and Rudolph, P. ed.; Elsevier Science B.V.: Amsterdam, 2004; p. 55.Google Scholar
Bončina, T.: Shapes of the icosahedral quasicrystalline phase in melt-spun ribbons. Metalurgija 52, 65 (2013).Google Scholar
Kurz, W. and Fisher, D.J.: Fundamentals of Solidification (Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Switzerland, 1998), p. 21.Google Scholar
Sunagawa, I.: Crystals: Growth, Morphology, & Perfection (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005), p. 10.Google Scholar
Tsai, A.P., Inoue, A., and Masumoto, T.: A stable quasicrystal in Al-Cu-Fe system. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26, L1505 (1987).Google Scholar
Ohashi, W. and Spaepen, F.: Stable Ga–Mg–Zn quasi-periodic crystals with pentagonal dodecahedral solidification morphology. Nature 330, 555 (1987).Google Scholar
Murphy, C.J.: Nanocubes and nanoboxes. Science 298, 2139 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, R.Y., Lu, W.H., and Hogan, L.M.: Growth morphology of primary silicon in cast Al–Si alloys and the mechanism of concentric growth. J. Cryst. Growth 207, 43 (1999).Google Scholar
Wang, Z.L.: Transmission electron microscopy of shape-controlled nanocrystals and their assemblies. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 1153 (2000).Google Scholar
Chen, L., Wang, H.Y., Luo, D., Zhang, H.Y., Liu, B., and Jiang, Q.C.: Synthesis of octahedron and truncated octahedron primary Mg2Si by controlling the Sb contents. CrystEngComm 15, 1787 (2013).Google Scholar
Li, C., Wu, Y.Y., Li, H., and Liu, X.F.: Morphological evolution and growth mechanism of primary Mg2Si phase in Al–Mg2Si alloys. Acta Mater. 59, 1058 (2011).Google Scholar
Dobrushin, R.L., Kotecý, R., and Shlosman, S.: Wulff Construction: A Global Shape from Local Interaction (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1992), p. 8.Google Scholar
Bravais, A.: Etudes Cristallographiques (Gauthier Villars, Paris, 1866), p. 167.Google Scholar
Donnay, J.D.H. and Harker, D.: A new law of crystal morphology extending the law of Bravais. Am. Mineral. 22, 446 (1937).Google Scholar
Friedel, G.: Studies on the law of Bravais. Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. 30, 326 (1907).Google Scholar
Shechtman, D. and Blech, I.A.: The microstructure of rapidly solidified Al6Mn. Metall. Trans. A 16, 1005 (1985).Google Scholar