Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:18:58.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Creep behavior and microstructural correlation of a particle-strengthened Nb–1Zr–0.1C alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

D.M. Farkas  and
A.K. Mukherjee
D.M. Farkas
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616
A.K. Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616
Get access

Abstract

The steady-state creep behavior of a particle-strengthened alloy of niobium (Nb–1Zr–0.1C) was compared with pure niobium and a Nb–1Zr alloy. The approach to a threshold stress was indicated at stress levels below 16 MPa and was supported by a statistical analysis of mean particle size. Analysis of the crept microstructure showed a classic dislocation substructure whose cell size was inversely proportional to the applied stress except at very low stresses. The smaller than predicted cell size observed at low applied stresses was attributed to the particles, preventing the dislocation cells from reaching their equilibrium dimension. Some amount of particle growth was observed which led to a reduction in creep resistance with time.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 11 , Issue 9 , September 1996 , pp. 2198 - 2205
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Titran, R. H., Adv. Mat. Processes, 34, Nov. (1992).Google Scholar
2.Titran, R. H. and Stephens, J.R., DOE/NASA/16310-8, NASA TM-101364 (1988).Google Scholar
3.Delgrosso, E. J., Carlson, C. E., and Kaminski, J. J., J. Less-Comm. Metals 12, 173 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Davidson, M.J., Biberger, M., and Mukherjee, A.K., Scripta Metall. Mater. 27, 1829 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Horak, J. A. and Egner, L. K., ORNL-6809 (1994).Google Scholar
6.Arieli, A. and Mukherjee, A. K., Proc. Int. Conf. on Creep, edited by Wilshire, B. and Owen, D.R. J. (Pineridge Press, Swansea, U.K., 1981), p. 97.Google Scholar
7.Farkas, D. M., Groza, J.R., and Mukherjee, A. K., Scripta Metall. Mater. 34, 103 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Norton, J. T. and Mowry, A.L., Metals Trans., 133, Feb. (1949).Google Scholar
9.Grobstein, T. L. and Titran, R.H., DOE/NASA/16310-6, NASA TM-100848 (1986).Google Scholar
10.Cadek, J., Creep in Metallic Materials (Elsevier, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
11.Yeh, Y. H., Nakashima, H., Kurishita, H., Goto, S., and Yoshinaga, H., Mater. Trans. JIM 31 (4), 284 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Scattergood, R. and Bacon, D., Philos. Mag. 14, 179 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Lund, R. W. and Nix, W.D., Metall. Trans. A 6, 1329 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Lagneborg, R., J. Mater. Sci. 3, 596 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Takeuchi, S. and Argon, A.S., J. Mater. Sci. 11, 1542 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Mukherjee, A. K., Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, Plastic Deformation of Materials, edited by Arsenault, R. J. (Academic Press, New York, 1975), Vol. 6, p. 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar