Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:30:46.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Degradation of organic field-effect transistors made of pentacene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Ch. Pannemann ,
T. Diekmann  and
U. Hilleringmann
Ch. Pannemann*
Affiliation:
University of Paderborn, Department of Electrical Engineering EIM-E, Warburger Str. 100, D-33098 Paderborn, Germany
T. Diekmann
Affiliation:
University of Paderborn, Department of Electrical Engineering EIM-E, Warburger Str. 100, D-33098 Paderborn, Germany
U. Hilleringmann
Affiliation:
University of Paderborn, Department of Electrical Engineering EIM-E, Warburger Str. 100, D-33098 Paderborn, Germany
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author.e-mail: pannemann@sensorik.uni-paderborn.de
Get access

Abstract

This article reports degradation experiments on organic thin film transistors using the small organic molecule pentacene as the semiconducting material. Starting with degradation inert p-type silicon wafers as the substrate and SiO2 as the gate dielectric, we show the influence of temperature and exposure to ambient air on the charge carrier field-effect mobility, on-off-ratio, and threshold-voltage. The devices were found to have unambiguously degraded over 3 orders of magnitude in maximum on-current and charge carrier field-effect mobility, but they still operated after a period of 9 months in ambient air conditions. A thermal treatment was carried out in vacuum conditions and revealed a degradation of the charge carrier field-effect mobility, maximum on-current, and threshold voltage.

Keywords

AgingOrganicSemiconductor
Type
Articles—Organic Electronics Special Section
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 19 , Issue 7 , July 2004 , pp. 1999 - 2002
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Gundlach, D.J., Kuo, C.C., Nelson, S.F., and Jackson, T.N.: in 57th Device Research Conference Digest, pp. 164–165, (1999).Google Scholar
2.Jackson, T.N., Lin, Y.Y., Gundlach, D.J., and Klauk, H.: IEEE J. Selected Topics Quantum Electron 4, 100 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Zilker, S.J., Detcheverry, C., Cantatore, E., and de Leeuw, D.M.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1124 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Gelinck, G.H., Geuns, T.C.T., and de Leeuw, D.M.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1487 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Lin, Y-Y., Gundlach, D.J., Nelson, S.F., and Jackson, T.N.: IEEE Electron Device Lett. 18, 606 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. J.H. Schön, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 4163 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Pannemann, C., Diekmann, T., and Hilleringmann, U.: Microelectron. Eng. 1, 852 (2003).Google Scholar
8.Knipp, D., Street, R.A., Völkel, A. and Ho, J.: J. Appl. Phys. 93, 347 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Northrup, J.E. and Chabinyc, M.L.: Phys. Rev. B 68, 041202 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Brown, A.R., Jarret, C.P., de Leeuw, D.M. and Matters, M.: Synth. Met. 88, 37 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar