Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T04:37:51.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of advanced Fe–Al–O ODS alloy microstructure and properties due to heat treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2020

Stanislava Fintová*
Affiliation:
CEITEC IPM, Institute of Physics of Materials, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-61662Brno, Czech Republic
Ivo Kuběna
Affiliation:
CEITEC IPM, Institute of Physics of Materials, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-61662Brno, Czech Republic
Natália Luptáková
Affiliation:
CEITEC IPM, Institute of Physics of Materials, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-61662Brno, Czech Republic
Milan Jarý
Affiliation:
CEITEC IPM, Institute of Physics of Materials, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-61662Brno, Czech Republic
Miroslav Šmíd
Affiliation:
CEITEC IPM, Institute of Physics of Materials, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-61662Brno, Czech Republic
Luděk Stratil
Affiliation:
CEITEC IPM, Institute of Physics of Materials, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-61662Brno, Czech Republic
Filip Šiška
Affiliation:
CEITEC IPM, Institute of Physics of Materials, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-61662Brno, Czech Republic
Jiří Svoboda
Affiliation:
CEITEC IPM, Institute of Physics of Materials, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-61662Brno, Czech Republic
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: fintova@ipm.cz
Get access

Abstract

Fe–Al–O ODS alloy prepared via mechanical alloying was subjected to three different heat treatments. Material basic state exhibited a fine-grained (300–500 nm) microstructure with fine dispersion of aluminum oxide particles (60% up to 20 nm). Heat treatment at 1100 °C for 3 h resulted in local grain and particles coarsening. Prolongation of the heat treatment to 24 h resulted in further grain (50 % up to 5 μm) and particle (25 % with size 25–40 nm) coarsening. Annealing at 1200 °C for 24 h led to a bimodal microstructure (35 % of grains with size 100–250 μm and 45 % of particles with size 30–60 nm) and substantial oxide particle coarsening. Microstructural changes resulted in tensile strength decrease and ductility increase. Tensile tests at 800 °C revealed a 90% decrease of tensile strength while ductility increased 4–6 times when compared to the room temperature tests. The hardening ratio was below 10 % for all the alloys and both test temperatures.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020, published on behalf of Materials Research Society by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lee, J.H.: Development of oxide dispersion strengthened ferritic steels with and without aluminum. Front. Energy 6, 2934 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auger, M., Leguey, T., Munoz, A., Monge, M., de Castro, V., Fernandez, P., Garces, G., and Pareja, R.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of ultrafine-grained Fe-14Cr and ODS Fe-14Cr model alloys. J. Nucl. Mater. 417, 213216 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubena, I., Fournier, B., and Kruml, T.: Effect of microstructure on low cycle fatigue properties of ODS steels. J. Nucl. Mater. 424, 101108 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palm, M.: Concepts derived from phase diagram studies for the strengthening of Fe–Al-based alloys. Intermetallics 13, 12861295 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, B.A.K.C.P.: Mechanical Behaviour and Testing of Materials (PHI Learning Private Limited, Delhi, 2011).Google Scholar
Zakine, C., Prioul, C., and François, D.: Creep behaviour of ODS steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 219, 102108 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, J., Rementeria, R., Aranda, M., Capdevila, C., and Gonzalez-Carrasco, J.L.: Comparison of ductile-to-brittle transition behavior in two similar ferritic oxide dispersion strengthened alloys. Materials 9, 637 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalaj, O., Jirková, H., Janda, T., Kučerová, L., Studecký, T., and Svoboda, J.: Improving the high-temperature properties of a new generation of Fe-Al-O oxide-precipitation-hardened steels. Mater. Technol. 53, 495504 (2019).Google Scholar
Wang, L., Song, C., Sun, F., Li, L., and Zhai, Q.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of 12 wt.% Cr ferritic stainless steel with Ti and Nb dual stabilization. Mater. Des. 30, 4956 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siska, F., Stratil, L., Hadraba, H., Fintova, S., Kubena, I., Zalezak, T., and Bartkova, D.: High temperature deformation mechanisms in the 14% Cr ODS alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 689, 3439 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratil, L., Siska, F., Hadraba, H., Bartkova, D., Fintova, S., and Puchy, V.: Fracture behavior of the ODS steels prepared by internal oxidation. Fusion Eng. Des. 124, 11081111 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, D., Prakash, U., Dabhade, V.V., Laha, K., and Sakthivel, T.: Development of oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) ferritic steel through powder forging. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 26, 18171824 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mašek, B., Khalaj, O., Nový, Z., Kubina, T., Jirkova, J., Svoboda, J., and Štádler, C.: Behaviour of new ODS alloys under single and multiple deformation. Mater. Technol. 50, 891898 (2016).Google Scholar
Bártková, D., Šmíd, M., Mašek, B., Svoboda, J., and Šiška, F.: Kinetic study of static recrystallization in an Fe–Al–O ultra-fine-grained nanocomposite. Philos. Mag. Lett. 97, 379385 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svoboda, J., Horník, V., Stratil, L., Hadraba, H., Mašek, B., Khalaj, O., and Jirková, H.: Microstructure evolution in ODS alloys with a high-volume fraction of nano oxides. Metals 8, 1079 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. and Nicholson, R.: Strengthening Methods in Crystals (Elsevier Pub. Co., Amsterdam; New York, 1971).Google Scholar
Siska, F., Stratil, L., Hadraba, H., Fintova, S., Kubena, I., Hornik, V., Husak, R., Bartkova, D., and Zalezak, T.: Strengthening mechanisms of different oxide particles in 9Cr ODS steel at high temperatures. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 732, 112119 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar