Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:54:11.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of halide ions on Li+ ionic conductivity in oxyhalo-borate glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Yuhu Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Chemistry, School of Engineering, Okayama University, 3-1-1, Tsushima Naka, Okayama-Shi, 700 Japan
Akiyoshi Osaka
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Chemistry, School of Engineering, Okayama University, 3-1-1, Tsushima Naka, Okayama-Shi, 700 Japan
Yoshinari Miura
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Chemistry, School of Engineering, Okayama University, 3-1-1, Tsushima Naka, Okayama-Shi, 700 Japan
Katsuaki Takahashi
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Chemistry, School of Engineering, Okayama University, 3-1-1, Tsushima Naka, Okayama-Shi, 700 Japan
Get access

Abstract

The electrical conductivity has been measured for the glasses in the system B2O3–Li2O–Li2X2(X = F, Cl, Br), where Li2O is replaced by Li2X2 with Li content kept constant. The conductivity decreases for F glasses and increases for Cl and Br glasses with increasing halide ion content, which is caused by the increase in the activation energy for F glasses and the decrease for Cl and Br glasses. The analysis of the activation energy in terms of the Anderson-Stuart model indicates that, with the increase in LiX, Δ Eb, (the electrostatic energy) increases for F glass, whereas ΔEs (the strain energy) and ΔEb decrease for Cl or Br glasses. The effects of F and other halide ions are attributed to a stronger interaction between Li and F, and to expanded and weakened glass network due to accommodation of Br and Cl ions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Takahashi, T. and Yamamoto, O., Chem. Lett. 1979, 135.Google Scholar
2Levasseur, A., Brethous, J. C., Reau, J.-M., and Hagenmuller, P., Mater. Res. Bull. 14, 921 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Malugani, J. P. and Robert, G., Mater. Res. Bull. 14, 1075 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Smedley, S. I. and Angell, C. A., Mater. Res. Bull. 15, 421 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Button, D. P., Tandon, R. P., Tuller, H. L., and Uhlmann, D. R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 42, 297 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Levasseur, A., Kbala, M., and Hagenmuller, P., Solid State Ionics 9&10, 1439 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Ryan, M. J. and Smedley, S. I., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 65, 29 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Downing, H. L., Peterson, N. L., and Jain, H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 50, 203 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Takahashi, K. and Osaka, A., Yogyo-Kyokai-Shi 91, 22 (1983).Google Scholar
10Irion, M., Couzi, M., Levasseur, A., Reau, J.-M., and Brethous, J. C., J. Solid State Chem. 31, 285 (1980).Google Scholar
11Geissberger, A. E., Bucholts, F., and Bray, P. J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 49, 117 (1982).Google Scholar
12Turcotte, D. E., Risen, W. M. Jr., and Kamitsos, E. I., Solid State Commun. 51, 313 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Anderson, O. L. and Stuart, D. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 37, 573 (1954).Google Scholar
14Hakim, R. M. and Uhlmann, D. R., Phys. Chem. Glasses 12, 132 (1971).Google Scholar
15McElfresh, D. K. and Howitt, D. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, C237 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Shannon, R. D., Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Matusita, K., Ito, M., Kamiya, K., and Sakka, S., Yogyo-Kyokai-Shi 84, 48 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Wang, Y-H., Osaka, A., Miura, Y., and Takahashi, K., in the Extended Abstracts of the 26th Symposium on Glass, The Glass Division of the Ceramic Society of Japan, Okayama, 1985, p. 22.Google Scholar