Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:06:17.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of ultraviolet radiation on ultra-low-dielectric constant thin film fracture properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2011

Ryan Scott Smith ,
Ting Y. Tsui  and
Paul S. Ho
Ryan Scott Smith*
Affiliation:
The Laboratory for Interconnect and Packaging, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758
Ting Y. Tsui
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Nanotechnology Institute, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
Paul S. Ho
Affiliation:
The Laboratory for Interconnect and Packaging, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: scott_smith@mail.utexas.edu
Get access

Abstract

The effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on ultra-low-k dielectric (ULK) thin film fracture toughness were studied. This work discusses both critical and subcritical crack growth behavior under different environments. The critical fracture toughness was measured as a function of applied phase angle by using the four-point bend flexure and mixed-mode double cantilever beam techniques. Results of critical fracture toughness obtained under different loading configurations and phase angles were found to increase with the UV treatment time. In contrast, mode I subcritical fracture toughness thresholds and the crack propagation velocity appeared to be insensitive to UV curing processes. This study revealed that subcritical fracture toughness values reduced with the moisture concentration in the environment.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 24 , Issue 9 , September 2009 , pp. 2795 - 2801
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Smith, R., Tsui, T.Y. and Ho, P.: The effect of ultraviolet light curing on the material properties and molecular structure of κ˜ 2.5 low-k dielectric. J. Appl. Phys. (2009, submitted).Google Scholar
2Iacopi, F., Waldfried, C., Abell, T., Travaly, Y., Guyer, E.P., Gage, D.M., Eyckens, B., Sajavaara, T., Houthoofd, K., Grobet, P., Jacobs, P., Maex, K. and Dauskardt, R.H.: Short-ranged structural rearrangement and enhancement of mechanical properties of organosilicate glasses induced by ultraviolet radiation. J. Appl. Phys. 99, 053511 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Gage, D.M., Guyer, E.P., Stebbins, J.F., Cui, Z., Al-Bayati, A., Demos, A., MacWilliams, K. and Dauskardt, R.H.: UV curing effects on glass structure and mechanical properties of organosilicate low-k thin films, in Proceedings of the IEEE 2006 International Interconnect Technology Conference (IEEE, 2006), p. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Lin, Y., Xiang, Y., Tsui, T.Y. and Vlassak, J.J.: PECVD lowpermittivity organosilicate glass coatings: Adhesion, fracture and mechanical properties. Acta Mater. 56(17), 4932 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Kim, T.S., Tsuji, N., Kemeling, N., Matsushita, K., Chumakov, D., Geisler, H. and Zschech, E.: Depth dependence of ultraviolet curing of organosilicate low-k thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 103(6), 064108 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Charalambides, P.G., Cao, H.C., Lund, J. and Evans, A.G.: Development of a test method for measuring the mixed-mode fracture resistance of bimaterial interfaces. Mech. Mater. 8, 269 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Fleck, N.A., Hutchinson, J.W. and Suo, Z.G.: Crack path selection in a brittle adhesive layer. Int. J. Solids Struct. 27(13), 1683 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Fernlund, G. and Spelt, J.K.: Mixed-mode fracture characterization of adhesive joints. Compos. Sci. Technol. 50, 441 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Wiederhorn, S.M.: Moisture assisted crack growth in ceramic. Int. J. Fract. Mech. 4, 171 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Vlassak, J.J., Lin, Y. and Tsui, T.Y.: Fracture of organosilicate glass thin films: Environmental effects. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 391, 159 (2004)Google Scholar
11Lane, M.: Interface fracture. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 33, 29 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Lane, M., Dauskardt, R., Ma, Q., Fujimoto, H. and Krishna, N.: Subcritical debonding of multilayer interconnect structures: Temperature and humidity effects, in Materials Realibility in Microelectronics IX, edited by Volkert, C.A., Verbruggen, A.H., and Brown, D.D. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 563, Warrendale, PA, 1999), pp. 251–256.Google Scholar
13Cook, R.F. and Liniger, E.G.: Kinetics of indentation cracking in glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 1096 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Gage, D.M., Stebbins, J.F., Peng, L.M., Cui, Z.J., Al-Bayati, A., MacWilliams, K.P., M'Saad, H. and Dauskardt, R.H.: Effects of UV cure on glass structure and fracture properties of nanoporous carbon-doped oxide thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 104(4), 043513 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Li, H., Lin, Y., Tsui, T.Y. and Vlassak, J.J.: The effect of porogen loading on the stiffness and fracture energy of brittle organosilicates. J. Mater. Res. 24(1), 107 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar