Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:21:01.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence for hydrothermal growth of diamond in the C–H–O and C–H–O halogen system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Rustum Roy
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
D. Ravichandran
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
P. Ravindranathan
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
A. Badzian
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Get access

Abstract

Powder x-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman evidence are presented for the formation of crystalline diamond in the “hydrothermal” pressure-temperature regime 1–5 kbars, <1000 °C. Two different methods appear to enable diamond to nucleate and grow. One—a Low Pressure Solid-State Source (LPSSS) route—utilizes special solid precursors, especially low temperature glassy carbon (GC-500), with very fine diamond seeds in sealed gold capsules with H2O at, say, 800 °C and 1 kbar. The other includes pyrolysis of highly selected organic solid/liquid precursors (halogenated aliphatics such as iodoform) onto similar diamond seeds. In all the cases, powder x-ray diffraction evidence shows a marked increase of the diamond XRD peaks, likewise the Raman spectrum shows a strong increase of the 1331 cm−1 line. However, the crystals apparently are too small to be seen in the SEM. TEM diffraction data, on the other hand, seem to lend support to the possibility of all the grown diamonds being very small.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bundy, F. P., Hall, H. T., Strong, H. M., and Wentorf, R. H. Jr., Nature (London) 176 (51) (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Spitsyn, V. B., Bouilov, L. L., and Derjaguin, B. V., Prog. Crystal Growth Charact. 17, 79 (1988); see also J. Crystl. Growth 52, 219 (1981); Diamond Relat. Mater. 1, 705 (1992).Google Scholar
3.Kamo, M., Sato, Y., Matsumoto, S., and Setaka, N., J. Cryst. Growth 62, 642 (1983).Google Scholar
4.Roy, R., Dewan, H. S., and Ravindranathan, P., J. Mater. Chem. 3 (6), 685686 (1993).Google Scholar
5.Roy, R., Dewan, H. S., and Ravindranathan, P., Mater. Res. Bull. 28, 861866 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Roy, R., Dewan, H. S., Cherian, K. A., Cheng, J.P., Badzian, A., Drawl, W., and Langlade, C., Mater. Lett. 25, 191193 (1995).Google Scholar
7. (a)Roy, D., Datta, R., Faile, S., and Tuttle, O. F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 47, 153 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(b)Ragone, S. E., Datta, R., Roy, D., and Tuttle, O. F., J. Phys. Chem. 70, 3360 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.DeVries, R. C., in Advanced Ceramics III, edited by Sōmiya, S. (Elsevier Applied Science, London and New York, 1990), pp. 181205. (Paper was presented in Tokyo, Japan 1988.)Google Scholar
9.DeVries, R. C., Roy, R., Sō;miya, S., and Yamada, S., Trans. Mater. Res. Soc. Jpn. 19B, 641667 (1994).Google Scholar
10.Szymanski, A., Abgorowicz, E., Bakon, A., Nidbalska, A., Salacinski, R., and Sentek, J., Diamond Relat. Mater. 4, 234235 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sobolev, N. V. and Shatskii, V. S., Geol. Geofiz. 7, 7780 (1987).Google Scholar
12.Sobolev, N. V. and Shatskii, V. S., Nature (London) 343, 742745 (1990).Google Scholar