Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:01:11.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extrusion behavior of impurities in upsetting process of rail flash butt welding based on finite element method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2019

Jiao Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Xi Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Da Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Qibing Lv*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Rui Ma
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: xnjdlvqibing@163.com
Get access

Abstract

Oxide inclusions such as gray spots are the main defects caused by rail flash butt welding (FBW). An appropriate temperature field and upsetting process are essential for the extrusion of joint impurities. This study constructed a thermomechanical coupling model for the solid-state upsetting process of rail FBW through a combination of finite element simulation and experiment. Subsequently, the effects of different temperature fields and upsetting parameters on the extrusion behavior of impurities were studied. The results show that when the lateral deformation of the joint is not considered, selecting the appropriate upsetting length and increasing the width of the high-temperature plastic zone are beneficial for the extrusion of harmful impurities. Moreover, using variable speed upsetting or increasing the speed of the early upsetting facilitates the extrusion of impurities. However, the impurities in the deeper areas of the rail are difficult to move, and they easily form gray spot defects if the oxide inclusions remain.

Type
Invited Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Godefroid, L.B., Faria, G.L., Cândido, L.C., and Viana, T.G.: Fatigue failure of a flash butt welded rail. Procedia Mater. Sci. 3, 18961901 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D.H., Iwand, H.C., Kristan, J., and Lehnhoff, G.R.: Flash butt rail weld vertical fractures. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 15, 3338 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, X., Fan, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, H., and Dong, P.: Evaluation of fatigue fracture mechanism in a flash butt welding joint of a U75V type steel for railroad applications. Eng. Failure Anal. 55, 2638 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q., Li, L., Ding, W., Song, H.T., and Gao, Z.K.: Investigation on process and welded joint mechanical properties of bainitic steel rail flash butt welding. Key Eng. Mater. 723, 406411 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichiyama, Y., Ichikawa, M., and Saito, T.: The effect of upsetting conditions on flash weld toughness. Study on toughness improvement of flash welded joints in high strength steel. Weld. Int. 18, 683691 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, A., Gao, F., Niu, X., and Luo, H.: Prediction of gray-spot area in rail flash butt welded joint based on BP neural network. Trans. China Weld. Inst. 37, 1114 (2016).Google Scholar
Shen, J., Wei, Z., Zhu, X., Liang, Y., Liang, Y., Jiang, F., and Xiao, Z.: Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of flash butt-welded Inconel718 joints. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 718, 3442 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozakgul, K., Piroglu, F., and Caglayan, O.: An experimental investigation on flash butt welded rails. Eng. Failure Anal. 57, 2130 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z., Lu, P., and Shu, Y.: Microstructure and fracture mechanism of a flash butt welded 380CL steel. Eng. Failure Anal. 62, 199207 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, E., Tian, J., and Wu, Y.: On the nature and origin of flat-spot in flash-welded joint. Acta Metall. Sin. 23, 126152 (1987).Google Scholar
Räsänen, A-N. and Martikainen, J.: Experimental review of metallurgical flash weld defects in welded joints: Essence of flat spots, penetrators and oxide inclusions. Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 16, 471476 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichiyama, Y. and Saito, T.: Factors affecting flash weldability in high strength steel—A study on toughness improvement of flash welded joints in high strength steel. Weld. Int. 18, 436443 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shajan, N., Arora, K.S., Sharma, V., and Shome, M.: Effect of upset pressure on texture evolution and its correlation to toughness in flash butt joints. Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 23, 434440 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, P., Xu, Z., Jiang, K., Ma, F., and Shu, Y.: Influence of flash butt welding parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of HSLA 590CL welded joints in wheel rims. J. Mater. Res. 32, 831842 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, X., Feng, L., Qin, S., Zhang, Y., and He, Y.: Fracture analysis of U71Mn rail flash-butt welding joint. Case Stud. Eng. Failure Anal. 4, 2025 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziemian, C.W., Sharma, M.M., and Whaley, D.E.: Effects of flashing and upset sequences on microstructure, hardness, and tensile properties of welded structural steel joints. Mater. Des. 33, 175184 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y.C., Jiang, W., Zhao, H., Wei, Z., and Tu, S.T.: Brazed residual stress in a hollow-tube stacking: Numerical simulation and experimental investigation. J. Manuf. Process. 31, 3545 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, N., Cai, Z., Huang, H., Deng, D., Murakawa, H., and Pan, J.: Investigation of welding residual stress in flash-butt joint of U71Mn rail steel by numerical simulation and experiment. Mater. Des. 88, 12961309 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.Y. and Kim, H.G.: Numerical and experimental analysis of residual stresses in an arc welded lap joint and mapping of the residual stress field to a simplified finite element model. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 31, 48954902 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lionetto, F., Pappadà, S., Buccoliero, G., and Maffezzoli, A.: Finite element modeling of continuous induction welding of thermoplastic matrix composites. Mater. Des. 120, 212221 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, A., Ji, Y., Zhou, G., Yuan, Z., Han, B., and Li, Y.: Hot deformation behavior of V-microalloyed steel. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 17, 5560 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, H., Lv, Q., Tan, K., and Yan, J.: Investigation in thermal and mechanical simulation of upset deformation on U71Mn rail butt welding. J. China Railw. Soc. 05, 4548 (2005).Google Scholar
McClain, B., Batzer, S.A., and Maldonado, G.I.: A numeric investigation of the rake face stress distribution in orthogonal machining. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 123, 114119 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar