Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:30:47.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fabrication of eggshell membrane–based novel buccal mucosa–mimetic surface and mucoadhesion testing of chitosan oligosaccharide films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2019

Ashwini Kumar  and
Awanish Kumar Open the ORCID record for Awanish Kumar [Opens in a new window]
Ashwini Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492010, India
Awanish Kumar*
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492010, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: awanik.bt@nitrr.ac.in, drawanishkr@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Fabrication of simulated buccal mucosa could minimize sacrificing the animals (rabbits and pigs) to extract buccal mucosa for in vitro testing of buccal formulations. Novel artificial buccal mucosa was fabricated using eggshell membrane, extracted from poultry egg, and bovine submaxillary mucin. Chitosan oligosaccharide (COS)–based blended films were fabricated using solvent casting technique. Patches of equal dimensions were cut precisely from whole film. COS-based blended patches were analyzed for their physicochemical and mechanical properties. These patches, proposed to be used for buccal drug delivery, were tested for their mucoadhesion timing using the artificial mucosal membrane. The COS–PVA–blended patch displayed better mucoadhesion than chitosan oligosaccharide–alginate–blended film with the fabricated simulated buccal mucosa. Novel buccal mucosa mimetic–surface such as the one reported in this research article could prove to be a very useful tool in minimizing the use of excised animal buccal mucosa for mucoadhesion testing of buccal drug delivery formulations. Novel COS-blended films were fabricated as a proposed mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery vehicle.

Keywords

buccal mucosachitosan oligosaccharidedrug deliveryegg shell membranetransbuccal
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 34 , Issue 22 , 28 November 2019 , pp. 3777 - 3786
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shojaei, A.H.: Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: A review. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 1, 15 (1998).Google ScholarPubMed
Bagan, J., Paderni, C., Termine, N., Campisi, G., Lo Russo, L., and Di Fede, O.: Mucoadhesive polymers for oral transmucosal drug delivery: A review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 18, 5497 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stegemann, S., Gosch, M., and Breitkreutz, J.: Swallowing dysfunction and dysphagia is an unrecognized challenge for oral drug therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 430, 197 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mennella, J.A., Spector, A.C., Reed, D.R., and Coldwell, S.E.: The bad taste of medicines: Overview of basic research on bitter taste. Clin. Ther. 35, 1225 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barua, S., Kim, H., Jo, K., Seo, C.W., Park, T.J., Lee, K.B., Yun, G., Oh, K., and Lee, J.: Drug delivery techniques for buccal route: Formulation strategies and recent advances in dosage form design. J. Pharm. Invest. 46, 593 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudhakar, Y., Kuotsu, K., and Bandyopadhyay, A.K.: Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery—A promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J. Controlled Release 114, 15 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madhav, N.V.S., Shakya, A.K., Shakya, P., and Singh, K.: Orotransmucosal drug delivery systems: A review. J. Controlled Release 140, 2 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, D.J.: From mucins to mucus: Toward a more coherent understanding of this essential barrier. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 1, 54 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansil, R. and Turner, B.S.: Mucin structure, aggregation, physiological functions and biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 11, 164 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, S.K., Sutton, P., Karlsson, N.G., Korolik, V., and Mcguckin, M.A.: Mucins in the mucosal barrier to infection. Mucosal Immunol. 1, 183 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalewska, A., Zwierz, K., and Gindzieñski, A.: Structure and biosynthesis of human salivary mucins. Acta Biochim. Pol. 47, 1067 (2000).Google ScholarPubMed
De Almeida, P.D.V., Grégio, A.M.T., Machado, M.Â.N., De Lima, A.A.S., and Azevedo, L.R.: Saliva composition and functions: A comprehensive review. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 9, 072 (2008).Google Scholar
Kulkarni, U., Mahalingam, R., Pather, S.I., Li, X., and Jasti, B.: Porcine buccal mucosa as an in vitro model: Relative contribution of epithelium and connective tissue as permeability barriers. J. Pharm. Sci. 98, 471 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janet Hoogstraate, A. and Bodd, H.E.: Methods for assessing the buccal mucosa as a route of drug delivery. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 12, 99 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Z. and Mumper, R.J.: Bilayer films for mucosal (genetic) immunization via the buccal route in rabbits. Pharm. Res. 19, 947 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thirion-Delalande, C., Gervais, F., Fisch, C., Cuiné, J., Baron-Bodo, V., Moingeon, P., and Mascarrel, L.: Comparative analysis of the oral mucosae from rodents and non-rodents: Application to the nonclinical evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy products. PLoS One 12, 1 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, D.J., Khutoryanskaya, O.V., and Khutoryanskiy, V.V.: Developing synthetic mucosa-mimetic hydrogels to replace animal experimentation in characterisation of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Soft Matter 7, 9620 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, M.T., Smith, S.L., and Khutoryanskiy, V.V.: Novel glycopolymer hydrogels as mucosa-mimetic materials to reduce animal testing. Chem. Commun. 51, 14447 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
da Silva, J.B., Khutoryanskiy, V.V., Bruschi, M.L., and Cook, M.T.: A mucosa-mimetic material for the mucoadhesion testing of thermogelling semi-solids. Int. J. Pharm. 528, 586 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobsen, J., van Deurs, B., Pedersen, M., and Rassing, M.R.: TR146 cells grown on filters as a model for human buccal epithelium: I. Morphology, growth, barrier properties, and permeability. Int. J. Pharm. 125, 165 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, J., Nielsen, E.B., Brøndum-Nielsen, K., Christensen, M.E., Olin, H.D., Tommerup, N., and Rassing, M.R.: Filter-grown TR146 cells as an in vitro model of human buccal epithelial permeability. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 107, 138 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khutoryanskiy, V.V.: Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. Macromol. Biosci. 11, 748 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russo, E., Selmin, F., Baldassari, S., Gennari, C.G.M., Caviglioli, G., Cilurzo, F., Minghetti, P., and Parodi, B.: A focus on mucoadhesive polymers and their application in buccal dosage forms. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 1 (2015).Google Scholar
Muanprasat, C. and Chatsudthipong, V.: Chitosan oligosaccharide: Biological activities and potential therapeutic applications. Pharmacol. Ther. 170, 80 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, H., Huang, X., Sun, Y., Xing, J., Yamamoto, A., and Gao, Y.: Absorption-improving effects of chitosan oligomers based on their mucoadhesive properties: A comparative study on the oral and pulmonary delivery of calcitonin. Drug Delivery 23, 2419 (2016).Google ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A. and Kumar, A.: Development and characterization of tripolymeric and bipolymeric composite films using glyoxal as a potent crosslinker for biomedical application. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 73, 333 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gal, J.Y., Fovet, Y., and Adib-Yadzi, M.: About a synthetic saliva for in vitro studies. Talanta 53, 1103 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed