Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:51:46.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Forced chemical mixing at Cu-Nb interfaces under severe plastic deformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2012

Nhon Q. Vo*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Robert S. Averback
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Yinon Ashkenazy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801; and Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Pascal Bellon
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Jian. Wang
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: nhonvo2@illinois.edu
Get access

Abstract

Forced chemical mixing during severe plastic deformation was investigated at Cu-Nb face-centered-cubic (fcc)/body-centered-cubic (bcc) interfaces using molecular-dynamics simulations. Three Cu-Nb interfaces were considered, with either Kurdjumov-Sachs or Nishiyama-Wassermann orientation relationship (OR) between fcc and bcc phases. Forced mixing of a spherical bcc-Nb precipitate in fcc-Cu was also studied for comparison. Deformation was imposed by shape-preserving cycles using two different modes, biaxial compression and biplanar shearing to investigate the effects of strain path. For biplanar shear, the chemical mixing rate is strongly dependent on structure of the interface, with the Kurdjumov-Sachs OR and a (111)Cu‖(110)Nb habit plane being particularly resistant to mixing. During compression, no such dependence was found. Influences of interface diffuseness and roughness on stability were also investigated. The simulations show the interface mixing is inversely related to interface shear strength during shear deformation, but dominated by dislocation-glide through the Cu phase and subsequent absorption at Cu-Nb interfaces during compression deformation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Martin, G. and Bellon, P.: Driven alloys. Solid State Phys. 50, 189 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Suryanarayana, C.: Mechanical alloying and milling. Prog. Mater Sci. 46, 1 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ma, E.: Alloys created between immiscible elements. Prog. Mater Sci. 50, 413 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bellon, P. and Averback, R.S.: Nonequilibrium roughening of interfaces in crystals under shear—application to ball-milling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1819 (1995).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Martin, G.: Phase-stability under irradiation—ballistic effects. Phys. Rev. B 30, 1424 (1984).Google Scholar
6.Odunuga, S., Li, Y., Krasnochtchekov, P., Bellon, P., and Averback, R.S.: Forced chemical mixing in alloys driven by plastic deformation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 045901 (2005).Google Scholar
7.Ashkenazy, Y., Vo, N.Q., Schwen, D., Averback, R.S., and Bellon, P.: Shear induced chemical mixing in heterogeneous systems. Acta Mater. 60, 984 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Vo, N.Q., Odunuga, S., Bellon, P., and Averback, R.S.: Forced chemical mixing in immiscible alloys during severe plastic deformation at elevated temperatures. Acta Mater. 57, 3012 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Schwen, D., Averback, R.S., and Bellon, P. (in preparation).Google Scholar
10.Lund, A.C. and Schuh, C.A.: Driven alloys in the athermal limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 235505 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Delogu, F.: Forced chemical mixing in model immiscible systems under plastic deformation. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 073533 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Klassen, T., Herr, U., and Averback, R.S.: Ball milling of systems with positive heat of mixing: Effect of temperature in Ag-Cu. Acta Mater. 45, 2921 (1997).Google Scholar
13.Xu, J., Herr, U., Klassen, T., and Averback, R.S.: Formation of supersaturated solid solutions in the immiscible Ni-Ag system by mechanical alloying. J. Appl. Phys. 79, 3935 (1996).Google Scholar
14.Eckert, J., Holzer, J.C., Krill, C.E., and Johnson, W.L.: Mechanically driven alloying and grain-size changes in nanocrystalline Fe-Cu powders. J. Appl. Phys. 73, 2794 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Huang, J.Y., Yu, Y.D., Wu, Y.K., Li, D.X., and Ye, H.Q.: Microstructure and nanoscale composition analysis of the mechanical alloying of FexCu100-x (X = 16, 60). Acta Mater. 45, 113 (1997).Google Scholar
16.Ma, E., Atzmon, M., and Pinkerton, F.E.: Thermodynamic and magnetic properties of metastable FexCu100-x solid-solutions formed by mechanical alloying. J. Appl. Phys. 74, 955 (1993).Google Scholar
17.Ma, E., He, J.H., and Schilling, P.J.: Mechanical alloying of immiscible elements: Ag-Fe contrasted with Cu-Fe. Phys. Rev. B 55, 5542 (1997).Google Scholar
18.Gente, C., Oehring, M., and Bormann, R.: Formation of thermodynamically unstable solid solutions in the Cu-Co system by mechanical alloying. Phys. Rev. B 48, 13244 (1993).Google Scholar
19.Botcharova, E., Freudenberger, J., and Schultz, L.: Mechanical and electrical properties of mechanically alloyed nanocrystalline Cu-Nb alloys. Acta Mater. 54, 3333 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Demkowicz, M.J., Wang, J., and Hoagland, R.G.: Interfaces between dissimilar crystalline solids, in Dislocations in Solids, Vol. 14, Chap. 83, edited by Hirth, J.P. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2008), pp. 141207.Google Scholar
21.Han, W.Z., Carpenter, J.S., Wang, J., Beyerlein, I.J., and Mara, N.A.: Atomic-level study of twin nucleation from face-centered-cubic/body-centered-cubic interfaces in nanolamellar composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 011911 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Wang, J., Hoagland, R.G., Liu, X.Y., and Misra, A.: The influence of interface shear strength on the glide dislocation-interface interactions. Acta Mater. 59, 3164 (2011).Google Scholar
23.Zhang, R.F., Wang, J., Beyerlein, I.J., and Germann, T.C.: Dislocation nucleation mechanisms from fcc/bcc incoherent interfaces. Scr. Mater. 65, 1022 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Wang, J., Hoagland, R.G., Hirth, J.P., and Misra, A.: Atomistic simulations of the shear strength and sliding mechanisms of copper-niobium interfaces. Acta Mater. 56, 3109 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Yu-Zhang, K., Embury, J.D., Han, K., and Misra, A.: Transmission election microscopy investigation of the atomic structure of interfaces in nanoscale Cu-Nb multilayers. Philos. Mag. 88, 2559 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Lim, S.C.V and Rollett, A.D.: Length scale effects on recrystallization and texture evolution in Cu layers of a roll-boned Cu-Nb composite. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 520, 189 (2009).Google Scholar
27.Carpenter, J.S., Vogel, S.C., vLeDonne, J.E., Hammon, D.L., Beyerlein, I.J., and Mara, N.A.: Bulk texture evolution of Cu/Nb nanolamellar composites during accumulative roll bonding. Acta Mater. 60, 1576 (2012).Google Scholar
28.Demkowicz, M.J. and Hoagland, R.G.: Structure of Kurdjumov-Sachs interfaces in simulations of a copper-niobium bilayer. J. Nucl. Mater. 372, 45 (2008).Google Scholar
29.Plimpton, S.: Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular-dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
30.Stukowski, A.: Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO—the open visualization tool. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).Google Scholar
31.Faken, D. and Jonsson, H.: Systematic analysis of local atomic structure combined with 3D computer graphics. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2, 279 (1994).Google Scholar
32.Demkowicz, M.J., Hoagland, R.G., and Hirth, J.P.: Interface structure and radiation damage resistance in Cu-Nb multilayer nanocomposites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136102 (2008).Google Scholar
33.Kelchner, C.L., Plimpton, S.J., and Hamilton, J.C.: Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys. Rev. B 58, 11085 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Valiev, R.Z., Islamgaliev, R.K., and Alexandrov, I.V.: Bulk nanostructured materials from severe plastic deformation. Prog. Mater. Sci. 45, 103 (2000).Google Scholar
35.Quelennec, X., Menand, A., Le Breton, J.M., Pippan, R., and Sauvage, X.: Homogeneous Cu-Fe supersaturated solid solutions prepared by severe plastic deformation. Philos. Mag. 90, 1179 (2010).Google Scholar
36.Swygenhoven, H.V. and Derlet, P.M.: Grain-boundary sliding in nanocrystalline fcc metals. Phys. Rev. B 64, 224105 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Demkowicz, M.J. and Thilly, L.: Structure, shear resistance and interaction with point defects of interfaces in Cu-Nb nanocomposites synthesized by severe plastic deformation. Acta Mater. 59, 7744 (2011).Google Scholar
38.Brown, J.A. and Ghoniem, N.M.: Structure and motion of junctions between coherent and incoherent twin boundaries in copper. Acta Mater. 57, 4454 (2009).Google Scholar
39.Wang, J. and Misra, A.: An overview of interface-dominated deformation mechanisms in metallic multilayers. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sky. 15, 20 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar