Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T10:40:01.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation of Al3Ni Nanofibers in an Al-Based Metal Matrix Composite Fabricated by Reaction Sintering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Peng Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
Cheng-Ji Deng
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
Nan-Gang Ma
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
Dickon H.L. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
Get access

Abstract

We developed an Al2O3 and Al3Ni intermetallic reinforced Al-based metal matrix composite by sintering an Al-20 wt% NiO powder compact at 1000 °C. Differential thermal analysis showed that a two-step reaction took place between Al and NiO in the temperature range 600–650 °C. The initial stage was a solid-state reaction, but it was soon paused by the newly formed Al2O3 and Al3Ni phases that separated the Al and NiO grains. A liquid–solid reaction was later resumed as the temperature was increased above the eutectic temperature of Al–Al3Ni at 640 °C when molten Al–Ni appeared. When the molten sample was quenched to room temperature, a two-phase Al–Al3Ni eutectic was found in the sample. In comparison with the air-quenched and the oil-quenched samples, the sizes of proeutectic Al3Ni grains and Al–Al3Ni eutectic phases in the salt-solution-quenched sample were much finer. The eutectic contained Al3Ni nanofibers with a diameter of approximately 50 nm. A reaction model of Al and NiO was proposed. A thermodynamic model was also proposed to describe the formation of the composite.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Kawabata, K., Sato, E. and Kuribayashi, K.: Creep deformation behavior of spherical Al2O3 particle-reinforced AlMg matrix composites at high temperatures. Acta Mater. 50, 3465 (2002).Google Scholar
2Wang, S.H. and Kao, P.W.: The strengthening effect of Al3Ti in high temperature deformation of AlAl3Ti composites. Acta Mater. 46, 2675 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Lee, J.C., Byun, J.Y., Oh, C.S., Seok, H.K. and Lee, H.I.: Effect of various processing methods on the interfacial reactions in SiCp/2024 Al composites. Acta Mater. 45, 5303 (1997).Google Scholar
4Clyne, T.W. and Withers, P.J.: An Introduction to Metal Matrix Composites , 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993) p. 318Google Scholar
5Mortensen, A. and Jin, I.: Solidification processing of metal matrix composites. Inter. Mater. Rev. 37, 101 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Gotman, I. and Koczak, M.J.: Fabrication of Al matrix in situ composites via self-propagating synthesis. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 187, 189 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Li, Y.F., Qin, C.D. and Ng, D.H.L.: The morphology and growth mechanism of alumina whiskers in aluminum-based metal matrix composites. J. Mater. Res. 14, 2997 (1999).Google Scholar
8Yu, P., Deng, C.J., Ma, N.G., Yau, M.Y. and Ng, D.H.L.: Formation of nanostructured eutecic network in alpha-Al2O3 reinforced Al-Cu alloy matrix composite. Acta Mater. 51, 3445 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Peng, H.X., Wang, D.Z., Geng, L. and Yao, C.K.: Evaluation of the microstructure of in-situ reaction processed Al3Ti-Al2O3-Al composite. Scr. Mater. 37, 199 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Subramanian, R., McKamey, C.G., Schneibel, J.H., Buck, L.R. and Menchhofer, P.A.: Iron aluminideAl2O3 composite by in situ displacement reactions: Processing and mechanical properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 254, 119 (1998).Google Scholar
11Morsi, K.: Review: Reaction synthesis processing of NiAl intermetallic materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 299, 15 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Zhu, H.X. and Abbaschian, R.: Microstructures and properties of in-situ NiAl-Al2O3 functionally gradient composites. Composites B. 31, 383 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Zhu, H.X. and Abbaschian, R.: In-situ processing of NiAlalumina composites by thermite reaction. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 282, 1 (2000).Google Scholar
14Jones, S.A., Burlitch, J.M., Ustundag, E., Yoo, J. and Zehnder, A.T. Nickel-alumina composites: In situ synthesis by a displacement reaction, and mechanical properties, in Ceramic Matrix Composites—Advanced High-Temperature Structural Materials, edited by Lowden, R.A., Ferber, M.K., Hellman, J.R., Chawla, K.K., DiPietro, S.G., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 365, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995) p. 53Google Scholar
15Alivisatos, A.P.: Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science. 271, 933 (1996).Google Scholar
16Xiao, J.P., Xie, Y., Tang, R., Chen, M. and Tian, X.B.: Novel ultrasonically assisted templated synthesis of palladium and silver dendritic nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 13, 1887 (2001).Google Scholar
17Antonietti, M., Wenz, E., Bronstein, L. and Seregina, M.: Synthesis and characterization of noble metal colloids in block copolymer micelles. Adv. Mater. 7, 1000 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Ji, Y. and Yeomans, J.A.: Processing and mechanical properties of Al2O3-5 vol.% Cr nanocomposites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 22, 1927 (2002).Google Scholar
19Gao, L., Wang, H.Z., Kawaoka, H., Sekino, T. and Niihara, K.: Fabrication of YAG-SiC nanocomposites by spark plasma sintering. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 22, 785 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Calderon-Moreno, J.M., Schehl, M. and Popa, M.: Superplastic behavior of zirconia-reinforced alumina nanocomposites from powder alcoxide mixtures. Acta Mater. 50, 3973 (2002).Google Scholar
21Srivatsanm, T.S., Sudarshan, T.S. and Lavernia, E.J.: Processing of discontinuously-reinforced metal matrix composites by rapid solidification. Prog. Mater. Sci. 39, 317 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Calderon-Moreno, J.M. and Yoshimura, M.: Nanocomposites from melt in the system Al2O3-YAG-ZrO2. Scr. Mater. 44, 2153 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Davidson, D.L. and Chan, K.S.: The effect of microstructure on the fracture resistance of Nb-Cr-Ti in situ composites. Scr. Mater. 38, 1155 (1997).Google Scholar
24Gloriant, T. and Greer, A.L.: Al-based nanocrystalline composites by rapid solidification of Al-Ni-Sm alloys. Nanostructured Mater. 4, 389 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Hogan, L.M., Kraft, R.W. and Lemkey, F.D.: Eutectic grains. Adv. Mater. Res. 5, 83 (1971).Google Scholar
26Lemkey, F.D., Hertzberg, R.W. and Ford, J.A.: The microstructure, crystallography, and mechanical behavior of unidirectionally solidified Al-Al3Ni eutectic. Trans. AIME. 233, 334 (1965).Google Scholar
27Lyman, T.: Metallography, Structures and Phase Diagrams, Metal Handbook , 8th ed. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1973), p. 262Google Scholar
28Knacke, O., Kubaschewski, O. and Hesselmann, K.: Thermodynamical Properties of Inorganic Substances , 2nd ed. (Spinger-Verlag, Berlin, 1991), pp. 19, 47, 1438, and 1455Google Scholar
29Yu, Y.L.: Principles of Metallurgy , 1st ed. (Chinese Metallurgical Press, Beijing, 2000), p. 264Google Scholar
30Norman, A.F., Prangnell, P.B. and McEwen, R.S.: The solidification behavior of dilute aluminum-scandium alloys. Acta Mater. 46, 5715 (1998).Google Scholar
31Hall, E.O.: The deformation of mild steel: III Discussion of Results. Proc. R. Soc. (London). 643, 747 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Petch, N.J.: The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst. London. 173, 25 (1953).Google Scholar