Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:02:12.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved magnetic properties of self-assembled epitaxial nickel nanocrystallites in thin-film ceramic matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

D. Kumar ,
H. Zhou ,
T. K. Nath ,
Alex V Kvit ,
J. Narayan ,
V. Craciun  and
Rajiv K. Singh
D. Kumar
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–7916
H. Zhou
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–7916
T. K. Nath
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–7916
Alex V Kvit
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–7916
J. Narayan
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–7916
V. Craciun
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Rajiv K. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Get access

Abstract

Nanocrystalline nickel particles were embedded in amorphous alumina and crystalline TiN matrices using a pulsed laser deposition process to investigate the effect of texturing on magnetic properties of nickel nanocrystallites. The crystalline quality of both the matrix and magnetic particles was investigated by cross-sectional high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The embedded Ni nanocrystals were found to be epitaxial in the case of the TiN matrix and polycrystalline in Al2O3 amorphous matrix. The Ni nanocrystals on TiN/Si grow epitaxially because the TiN acting as a template grows epitaxially on Si substrate via domain epitaxy. On the other hand, Ni nanocrystals in the Al2O3 matrix are polycrystalline because of the amorphous nature of the alumina matrix. Magnetization versus temperature measurements have shown that the blocking temperature, above which the samples lose magnetization–field (M–H) hysteretic behavior, of the Ni–TiN sample (approximately 190 K) is significantly higher than that of Ni–Al2O3 sample (approximately 30 K) with a similar size distribution of embedded magnetic particles. A comparison of the values of coercivity (Hc) of the two samples, measured from M–H data, indicates that epitaxial Ni nanocrystals also exhibit significantly higher coercivity than polycrystalline Ni particles in amorphous alumina matrix. The high values of TB and Hc of Ni–TiN samples with respect to TB of N–A12O3 samples are believed to be associated with preferred alignment of nanocrystallites.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , April 2002 , pp. 738 - 742
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Alivisatos, A.P., Science 271, 933 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Murray, C.B., Kagan, C.R., and Bawendi, M.G., Science 270, 1335 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Puntes, V.F., Krishnan, K.M., and Alivisatos, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2187 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Dorman, J.L., Fiorani, D., and Tronc, E., Adv. Chem. Phys. 98, 283 (1997).Google Scholar
5Edelstein, A.S. and Cammarata, R.C., in “Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties and Applications (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, CT, and Philadelphia, PA, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Handbook of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, edited by Chastain, J. and King, R.C. (Physical Electronics, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, 1995).Google Scholar
7Darben, L.S. and Garry, R.W., Physical Chemistry of metals (McGraw Hill Book Co., 1953), p. 349.Google Scholar
8Luo, W., Nagel, S.R., Rosenbaum, T.F., and Rosensweig, R.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2721 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Chantrell, R.W., Walmsey, N.S., Gore, J., and Maylin, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 4320 (1999).Google Scholar
10Cullity, B.D., in Introduction to Magnetic materials (Addison Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1972).Google Scholar
11Narayan, J., U.S. Patent No. 5 406 123 (April 11, 1995). Appl. Phys. Lett.61, 1290 (1992)Google Scholar