Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:13:18.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In situ quasi-elastic scattering characterization of particle size effects on the hydration of tricalcium silicate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2004

A.J. Allen ,
J.C. McLaughlin ,
D.A. Neumann  and
R.A. Livingston
A.J. Allen*
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
J.C. McLaughlin
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
D.A. Neumann
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
R.A. Livingston
Affiliation:
Office of Infrastructure Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Virginia 22101
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: andrew.allen@nist.gov
Get access

Abstract

The effects of different particle size distributions on the real-time hydration of tricalcium silicate cement paste were studied in situ by quasi-elastic neutron scattering. The changing state of water in the cement system was followed as a function both of cement hydration time and of temperature for different initial particle size distributions. It was found that the length of the initial, dormant, induction period, together with the kinetics of hydration product nucleation and growth, depends on the hydration temperature but not on the particle size distribution. However, initial particle size does affect the total amount of cement hydrated, with finer particle size producing more hydrated cement. Furthermore, the diffusion-limited rate of hydration at later hydration time is largely determined by the initial tricalcium silicate particle size distribution.

Keywords

CementNeutron scatteringMicrostructure
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 19 , Issue 11 , November 2004 , pp. 3242 - 3254
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Chatelier, H.L. Le In Experimental Researches on the Constitution of Hydraulic Mortars (McGraw Publishing Co., New York, 1905)Google Scholar
2Skalny, J. and Odler, I.: Effect of heat treatment on the pore structure and drying shrinkage behavior of hydrated cement paste. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 40, 199 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Odler, I. and Dorr, H.: Tricalcium silicate formation by solid-state reactions. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 56, 1086 (1977).Google Scholar
4Bentur, A., Berger, R.L., Kung, J.H., Milestone, N.B. and Young, J.F.: Structural-properties of calcium silicate pastes 2. Effect of curing temperature. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 62, 362 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Taylor, H.F.W. in Cement Chemistry (Academic Press, London, U.K., 1990), pp. 153–156Google Scholar
6 Cement chemistry notation: C = CaO, S = SiO2, H = H2O. http://www.wordiq.com/definition/cementchemistnotation.Google Scholar
7Kondo, R. and Ueda, S.: Kinetics of Hydration of Cements, in Proc. 5th Int. Symposium on the Chemistry of Cement. Vol. II. (Cement Association of Japan Tokyo, Japan, 1969), p. 203.Google Scholar
8Taplin, J.H.: On the Hydration Kinetics of Hydraulic Cements, in Proc. 5th Int. Symposium on the Chemistry of Cement. Vol. II. (Cement Association of Japan Tokyo, Japan, 1969), p. 337.Google Scholar
9Pommersheim, J.M., Clifton, J.R. and Frohnsdorff, G.J.: Mathematical-modeling of tricalcium silicate hydration 2. Hydration sub-models and the effect of model parameters. Cem. Concr. Res. 12, 765 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Pommersheim, J.M. Effect of particle size distribution on hydration kinetics, in Microstructural Development During Hydration of Cement, edited by Struble, L.J. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 85, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987), p. 301Google Scholar
11Knudsen, T.: The dispersion model for hydration of portland-cement 1 general concepts. Cem. Concr. Res. 14, 622 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Knudsen, T. and Geiker, M.: Obtaining hydration data by measurement of chemical shrinkage with an archimeter. Cem. Concr. Res. 15, 381 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Brown, P.W., Pommersheim, J. and Frohnsdorff, G.: A kinetic-model for the hydration of tricalcium silicate. Cem. Concr. Res. 15, 35 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Bentz, D.P.: Three-dimensional computer simulation of Portland cement hydration and microstructure development. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 3 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Bentz, D.P., Garboczi, E.J., Haecker, C.J. and Jensen, O.M.: Effects of cement particle size distribution on performance properties of Portland cement-based materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 29, 1663 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Princigallo, A., Lura, P., van Breugel, K. and Levita, G.: Early development of properties in a cement paste: A numerical and experimental study. Cem. Concr. Res. 33, 1013 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Parrott, L.M., Geiker, M., Gutteridge, W.A. and Killoh, D.: Monitoring Portland-cement hydration - comparison of methods. Cem. Concr. Res. 20, 919 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Papavassiliou, G., Fardis, M., Laganas, E., Leventis, A., Hassanien, A., Milia, F., Papageorgiou, A. and Chaniotakis, E.: Role of the surface morphology in cement gel growth dynamics: A combined nuclear magnetic resonance and atomic force microscopy study. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 449 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Greener, J., Peemoeller, H., Choi, C., Holly, R., Reardon, E.J., Hansson, C.M. and Pintar, M.M.: Monitoring of hydration of white cement paste with proton NMR spin-spin relaxation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 623 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Allen, A.J., Oberthur, R.C., Pearson, D., Schofield, P. and Wilding, C.R.: Development of the fine porosity and gel structure of hydrating cement systems. Philos. Mag. B 56, 263 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Thomas, J.J., Jennings, H.M. and Allen, A.J.: The surface area of cement paste as measured by neutron scattering: Evidence for two C-S-H morphologies. Cem. Concr. Res. 28, 897 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Thomas, J.J., Jennings, H.M. and Allen, A.J.: The surface area of hardened cement paste as measured by various techniques. Concr. Sci. Eng. 1, 45 (1999).Google Scholar
23Vollet, D.R. and Craievich, A.F.: Effects of temperature and of the addition of accelerating and retarding agents on the kinetics of hydration of tricalcium silicate. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 12143 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Harris, D.H.C., Windsor, C.G. and Lawrence, C.D.: Free and bound water in cement pastes. Mag. Concr. Res. 26, 65 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25FitzGerald, S.A., Neumann, D.A., Rush, J.J., Bentz, D.P. and Livingston, R.A.: In situ quasi-elastic neutron scattering study of the hydration of tricalcium silicate. Chem. Mater. 10, 397 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Berliner, R., Popvici, M., Herwig, K.W., Berliner, M., Jennings, H.M. and Thomas, J.J.: Quasielastic neutron scattering study of the effect of water-to-cement ratio on the hydration kinetics of tricalcium silicate. Cem. Concr. Res. 28, 231 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Fratini, E., Chen, S-H., Baglioni, P. and Bellissent-Funel, M-C.: Dynamic scaling of quasielastic neutron scattering spectra from interfacial water. Phys. Rev. E 64, 020201 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Fratini, E., Faraone, A., Baglioni, P., Bellissent-Funel, M-C. and Chen, S-H.: Dynamic scaling of QENS spectra of glassy water in aging cement paste. Physica A 304, 1 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Fratini, E., Chen, S-H., Baglioni, P. and Bellissent-Funel, M-C.: Quasi-elastic neutron scattering study of translational dynamics of hydration water in tricalcium silicate. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 158 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30FitzGerald, S.A., Neumann, D.A., Rush, J.J., Kirkpatrick, R.J., Cong, X. and Livingston, R.A.: Inelastic neutron scattering study of the hydration of tricalcium silicate. J. Mater. Res. 14, 1160 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Thomas, J.J., FitzGerald, S.A., Neumann, D.A. and Livingston, R.A.: State of water in hydrating tricalcium silicate and portland cement pastes as measured by quasi-elastic neutron scattering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 1811 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32FitzGerald, S.A., Thomas, J.J., Neumann, D.A. and Livingston, R.A.: A neutron scattering study of the role of diffusion in the hydration of tricalcium silicate. Cem. Concr. Res. 32, 409 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Berliner, R., Popovici, M., Herwig, K., Jennings, H.M. and Thomas, J.: High-resolution neutron scattering with commercial thin silicon wafers as focusing monochromators. Physica B 241, 1237 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Livingston, R.A.: Fractal nucleation and growth model for the hydration of tricalcium silicate. Cem. Concr. Res. 30, 1853 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Thomas, J.J. and Jennings, H.M.: Effects of D2O and mixing on the early hydration kinetics of tricalcium silicate. Chem. Mater. 11, 1907 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 A.J. Allen, I.G. Richardson, and G.N. Kearley: (Institute Laue-Langevin: Grenoble, France, 1988) Unpublished results.Google Scholar
37Thomas, J.J., Chen, J., Jennings, H.M. and Allen, A.J.: Effects of decalcification on the microstructure and surface area of cement and tricalcium silicate pastes. Cem. Concr. Res. (2004, in press)Google Scholar
38Allen, A.J., Thomas, J.J., and Jennings, H.M.: Composition and density of amorphous calcium–silicate–hydrate gel in cement from combined neutron and x-ray small-angle scattering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., (2004) (in press).Google Scholar
39Brown, L.F.LANL Report LA-UR-01-1005 (Los Alamos, NM, 2001)Google Scholar
40Jillavenkatesa, A., Dapkunas, S.J. and Lum, L-S.H. in Particle Size Characterization, NIST Special Publication 960-1 (National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, 2001), p. 93Google Scholar
41Brown, W.K. and Wohletz, K.H.: Derivation of the Weibull distribution based on physical principles and its connection to the Rosin-Rammler and lognormal distributions. J. Appl. Phys. 78, 2758 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42Van Hulst, H.C. de in Light Scattering by Small Particles (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1962)Google Scholar
43Copley, J.R.D. and Udovic, T.J.: Neutron time-of-flight spectroscopy. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 98, 71 (1993).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Langer, J.S. and Schwartz, A.J.: Kinetics of nucleation in near-critical fluids. Phys. Rev. A 21, 948 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Allen, A.J., Gavillet, D. and Weertman, J.R.: SANS and TEM studies of isothermal M2C carbide precipitation in ultrahigh strength AF1410 steels. Acta Metall. Mater. 41, 1869 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Allen, A.J. and Livingston, R.A.: The relationship between differences in silica fume additives and the fine scale microstructural evolution in cement-based materials, Adv. Cement-Based Mater. 8, 118 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar