Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:37:45.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instrumented indentation probing of laser surface-refined cast Al alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

S. Nayak
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Center for Laser Applications, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
Laura Riester
Affiliation:
High Temperature Materials Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Narendra B. Dahotre
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Center for Laser Applications, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996; and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Get access

Abstract

The surface layer of A319 alloy was refined by selective remelting using laser energy. Instrumented indentation technique was used to measure hardness (H) and elastic modulus (E) of the laser-melted layer. Berkovich tip was used to indent the material for 100-nm, 200-nm, 500-nm, and 1000-nm depths. The H and the E were found to be 1.22 GPa and 78.2 GPa, respectively, for 1000-nm indentation depths. The variances associated with H and E were minimal, whereas, the same for substrate possessed significant scattering. Also, H and E increased with decreasing depth of indentation. Closer examination suggested that when the heterogeneity in the material was in the scale of indentation depth, significant scattering took place and the hard phase Si influenced the average hardness. However, the influence of indentation depth on elastic modulus was not statistically significant.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Avner, S.H.Introduction to Physical Metallurgy, (McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1974), p. 567.Google Scholar
2.Sigworth, G.K., AFS Trans. 66 7 (1983).Google Scholar
3.Djurdjevic, M., Stockwell, T. and Sokolowski, J., Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 12 67 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Pierantoni, M., Gremaud, M., Magnin, P., Stoll, D. and Kurz, W., Acta Metall. Mater. 40 1637 (1992).Google Scholar
5.Das, S., Yegneswaran, A.H. and Rohatgi, P.K., J. Mater. Sci. 22 3173 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Nayak, S., Reister, L.Meyer, H.M. III and Dahotre, N.B., J. Mater. Res. 18 833 (2003).Google Scholar
7.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
8.Hay, J.L. and Pharr, G.M.ASM Handbook, (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 2000), Vol. 8, p. 232.Google Scholar
9.Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1 601 (1986).Google Scholar
10.McElhaney, K.W., Vlassak, J.J. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 13 1300 (1998).Google Scholar
11.Ma, Q. and Clark, D.R., J. Mater. Res. 10 853 (1995).Google Scholar
12.Samuels, L.E.Metallographic Polishing by Mechanical Methods, (Pitman, London, U.K., 1967).Google Scholar