Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T20:11:56.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maximum heating rates for producing undistorted glassy carbon ware determined by wedge-shaped samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Hossein Maleki
Affiliation:
Center for Irradiation of Materials, Physics Department, Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, Normal, Alabama 35762
Lawrence R. Holland
Affiliation:
Center for Irradiation of Materials, Physics Department, Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, Normal, Alabama 35762
Gwyn M. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Center for Irradiation of Materials, Physics Department, Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, Normal, Alabama 35762
R. L. Zimmerman
Affiliation:
Center for Irradiation of Materials, Physics Department, Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, Normal, Alabama 35762
Wally Porter
Affiliation:
High Temperature Materials Laboratory (HTML), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6062
Get access

Abstract

Polymeric carbon artifacts are particularly difficult to make in thick section. Heating rate, temperature, and sample thickness determine the outcome of carbonization of resin leading to a glassy polymeric carbon ware. Using wedge-shaped samples, we found the maximum thickness for various heating rates during gelling (300 K–360 K), curing (360 K–400 K), postcuring (400 K–500 K), and precarbonization (500 K–875 K). Excessive heating rate causes failure. In postcuring the critical heating rate varies inversely as the fifth power of thickness; in precarbonization this varies inversely as the third power of thickness. From thermogravimetric evidence we attribute such failure to low rates of diffusion of gaseous products of reactions occurring within the solid during pyrolysis. Mass spectrometry shows the main gaseous product is water vapor; some carboniferous gases are also evolved during precarbonization. We discuss a diffusion model applicable to any heat-treatment process in which volatile products are removed from solid bodies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Jenkins, G.M. and Kawamura, K., Polymeric Carbon–Carbon Fiber, Glass and Char (Cambridge University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
2.Jackson, W. M. and Cony, R. T., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 8, 2163 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Jeffreys, K. D., Brit. Plastics 36 (4), 188 (1963).Google Scholar
4.Kohn, S. and La Res. Aerospec. 96, 39 (1963).Google Scholar
5.Heron, G. F., Soc. Chem. Ind. Mono. 13, 475 (1961).Google Scholar
6.Popov, V. A., Druyan, I. S., and Varshal, B. G., Plast. Massy. 5, 15 (1964).Google Scholar
7.Orrel, E. W. and Burns, R., Mater. Sci. 232, 72 (1967).Google Scholar
8.Jenkins, G. M. and Jones, R. A., High Temp.–High Press. 9, 137 (1977).Google Scholar
9.Eaton, A. and Jenkins, G. M. (1974) in Proc. of the Conference on Industrial Carbon and Graphite, Society of Chemical Industry, London.Google Scholar