Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:53:40.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring critical stress for shear failure of interfacial regions in coating/interlayer/substrate systems through a micro-pillar testing protocol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2017

Yang Mu ,
Xiaoman Zhang ,
John W. Hutchinson  and
Wen Jin Meng
Yang Mu
Affiliation:
Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Department, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
Xiaoman Zhang
Affiliation:
Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Department, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
John W. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Wen Jin Meng*
Affiliation:
Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Department, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: wmeng1@lsu.edu
Get access

Abstract

Mechanical integrity of the interfacial region between ceramic coatings and substrates is critical to high performance coated mechanical components and manufacturing tools. Mechanical failure of the coating/substrate interfacial region often leads to catastrophic failure of the coated system as a whole. Despite extensive research over the past two decades, quantitative assessment of the mechanical response of coating/substrate interfacial regions remains a challenge. The lack of reliable protocols for measuring the mechanical response of coating/substrate interfacial regions quantitatively hampers the understanding of key factors controlling the mechanical integrity of coating/substrate interfaces. In this paper, we describe a new micro-pillar testing protocol for quantitative measurement of critical stresses for inducing shear failure of interfacial regions in ceramic-coating/metal-adhesion-layer/substrate systems. We observe significant differences in the critical stress for shear failure of interfacial regions in CrN/Cu/Si, CrN/Cr/Si, and CrN/Ti/Si systems. The present testing protocol has general applicability to a wide range of coating/interlayer/substrate systems.

Keywords

coatingplasma depositionadhesion
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 32 , Issue 8 , 28 April 2017 , pp. 1421 - 1431
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: George M. Pharr

References

REFERENCES

Holmberg, K. and Matthews, A.: Coatings Tribology: Properties, Techniques, and Applications in Surface Engineering (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994).Google Scholar
Mercer, C., Evans, A.G., Yao, N., Allameh, S., and Cooper, C.V.: Material removal on lubricated steel gears with W-DLC-coated surfaces. Surf. Coat. Technol. 173, 122–129 (2003).Google Scholar
Jiang, J.C., Meng, W.J., Evans, A.G., and Cooper, C.V.: Structure and mechanics of W-DLC coated spur gears. Surf. Coat. Technol. 176, 50–56 (2003).Google Scholar
Kotzalas, M.N. and Doll, G.L.: Tribological advancements for reliable wind turbine performance. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 368, 4829–4850 (2010).Google Scholar
Mutyala, K.C., Singh, H., Evans, R.D., and Doll, G.L.: Deposition, characterization, and performance of tribological coatings on spherical rolling elements. Surf. Coat. Technol. 284, 302–309 (2015).Google Scholar
Cselle, T. and Barimani, A.: Today’s applications and future developments of coatings for drills and rotating cutting tools. Surf. Coat. Technol. 76/77, 712–718 (1995).Google Scholar
Robinson, G.M., Jackson, M.J., and Whitfield, M.D.: A review of machining theory and tool wear with a view to developing micro and nano machining processes. J. Mater. Sci. 42, 2002–2015 (2007).Google Scholar
Chinchanikar, S. and Choudhury, S.K.: Machining of hardened steel—Experimental investigations, performance modeling and cooling techniques: A review. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. 89, 95–109 (2015).Google Scholar
Brown, S.D.: Adherence failure and measurement: Some troubling questions. In Adhesion Measurement of Films and Coatings, Vol. 1, Mittal, K.L., ed. (VSP, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1995); p. 15.Google Scholar
Kattamis, T.Z.: On the evaluation of adhesion of coatings by automatic scratch testing. In Adhesion Measurement of Films and Coatings, Vol. 1, Mittal, K.L., ed. (VSP, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1995); p. 143.Google Scholar
Drory, M.D. and Hutchinson, J.W.: Measurement of the adhesion of a brittle film on a ductile substrate by indentation. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 452, 2319 (1996).Google Scholar
Vlassak, J.J., Drory, M.D., and Nix, W.D.: A simple technique for measuring the adhesion of brittle films to ductile substrates with application to diamond-coated titanium. J. Mater. Res. 12, 1900 (1997).Google Scholar
Agrawal, D.C. and Raj, R.: Measurement of the ultimate shear strength of a metal–ceramic interface. Acta Metall. 37, 1265 (1989).Google Scholar
Bull, S.J.: Can the scratch adhesion test ever be quantitative? In Adhesion Measurement of Films and Coatings, Vol. 2, Mittal, K.L., ed. (VSP, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2001); p. 107.Google Scholar
Begley, B.R., Mumm, D.R., Evans, A.G., and Hutchinson, J.W.: Analysis of a wedge impression test for measuring the interface toughness between films/coatings and ductile substrates. Acta Mater. 48, 3211 (2000).Google Scholar
Chen, B.F., Hwang, J., Yu, G.P., and Huang, J.H.: In situ observation of the cracking behavior of TiN coatings on 304 stainless steel subjected to tensile strain. Thin Solid Films 352, 173 (1999).Google Scholar
Mu, Y., Chen, K., Lu, B., Meng, W.J., and Doll, G.L.: Manufacturing of metal-based microparts: Fabrication strategies and surface engineering applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 237, 390–401 (2013).Google Scholar
Chen, K., Mu, Y., and Meng, W.J.: A new experimental approach for evaluating the mechanical integrity of interfaces between hard coatings and substrates. MRS Commun. 4, 19–23 (2014).Google Scholar
Mu, Y., Chen, K., and Meng, W.J.: Thickness dependence of flow stress of Cu thin films in confined shear plastic flow. MRS Commun. 4, 129–133 (2014).Google Scholar
Meng, W.J., Curtis, T.J., Rehn, L.E., and Baldo, P.M.: Temperature dependence of inductively coupled plasma assisted deposition of titanium nitride coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 120/121, 206–212 (1999).Google Scholar
Cullity, B.D. and Stock, S.R.: Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2001).Google Scholar
Ichimura, H. and Ando, I.: Mechanical properties of arc-evaporated CrN coatings: Part I—Nanoindentation hardness and elastic modulus. Surf. Coat. Technol. 145, 88–93 (2001).Google Scholar
Mu, Y., Zhang, X., Hutchinson, J.W., and Meng, W.J.: Dependence of confined plastic flow of polycrystalline Cu thin films on microstructure. MRS Commun. 6, 289–294 (2016).Google Scholar
Moser, B., Wasmer, K., Barbieri, L., and Michler, J.: Strength and fracture of Si micropillars: A new scanning electron microscopy-based micro-compression test. J. Mater. Res. 22, 1004–1011 (2007).Google Scholar
Brantley, W.A.: Calculated elastic constants for stress problems associated with semiconductor devices. J. Appl. Phys. 44, 534–535 (1972).Google Scholar
Sebastiani, M., Eberl, C., Bemporad, E., and Pharr, G.M.: Depth-resolved residual stress analysis of thin coatings by a new FIB–DIC method. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 7901–7908 (2011).Google Scholar
Mu, Y., Hutchinson, J.W., and Meng, W.J.: Micro-pillar measurements of plasticity in confined Cu thin films. Extreme Mech. Lett. 1, 62–69 (2014).Google Scholar