Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:24:41.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical and structural characterization of uniaxially cold-pressed Fe2Mo powders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

R. Morales
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Division of Metallurgy, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
S. Seetharaman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Division of Metallurgy, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
V. Agarwala
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, 247667, Uttaranchal, India
Get access

Abstract

In this work, Fe2Mo intermetallic powder, produced by H2 gas reduction of Fe2MoO4 was characterized by techniques like x-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The TEM studies confirmed the presence of nano- and microcrystalline grains of Fe2Mo. The above powders when compressed uniaxially showed a logarithmic relation with “relative density”, δr, of the compacts. The multiple compaction mechanisms were analyzed by Kawakita's and Balshin's models. Vickers hardness number, VHN, was found to increase linearly with δr of the compacts. The hardness of Fe2Mo intermetallic when δr = 1 was estimated as 343 VHN. Using Tabor's analysis, the yield strength of Fe2Mo was found to be about 1100 MPa. This value was further confirmed from the details of relative broadening (112) Bragg peak of Fe2Mo obtained from XRD analyses of Fe2Mo at different compaction pressures.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Liu, C.T. and Stiegler, J.O., Science 26, 636 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Baker, I. and Munroe, P.R., J. Met. 40, 28 (1988).Google Scholar
3.Schulson, E.M. and Barker, D.R., Scr. Metall. 17, 519 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Inoue, A., Tomioka, H., and Masumoto, T., Metall. Trans. A 14 1367 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Morales, R., Arvanitidis, I., Sichen, Du, and Seetharaman, S., Metall. Mater. Trans. (2002, in press).Google Scholar
6.Gutmanas, E.Y., Powder Metall. Int. 12, 178 (1980).Google Scholar
7.Brackpool, J.L.,Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy(Plenum, New York, 1971), pp. 423435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Benbow, J.J.,Enlargement and Compaction of Particulate Solids (Butterworth, Boston, MA, 1983), pp. 167-168.Google Scholar
9.Kawakita, K., J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Metall. 16, 236 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.James, P.J., Powder Metall. Int. 4, 193 (1972).Google Scholar
11.Marinkovic, B. and Nikolic, N., J. Min. Metall. B 36, 29 (2000).Google Scholar
12.Kuhn, L.T., McMeeking, R.M., and Lange, F.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 682 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Wulff, J., Powder Metallurgy (The American Society for Metals, Cleveland, OH, 1942). pp.500501.Google Scholar
14.Tabor, D., J. Inst. Met. 79, 1 (1951).Google Scholar
15.Cahoon, J.R., Broughton, W.H., and Kutzak, A.R., Metall. Trans. 2,1979 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar