Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:42:16.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metal foam regenerators; heat transfer and storage in porous metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2013

Farzad Barari ,
Erardo Mario Elizondo Luna ,
Russell Goodall  and
Robert Woolley
Farzad Barari*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Erardo Mario Elizondo Luna
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Russell Goodall
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Robert Woolley
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: f.barari@sheffield.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Open pore metal foams may be of interest as regenerators because of their large specific surface area and their high porosity. In this experiment, three aluminum foam samples (pore size 2–2.36 mm and around 65% porosity) were manufactured by the replication process. The volumetric heat transfer coefficient and number of transfer units (NTU) of the foams and a packed bed of steel ball bearings (2 mm diameter) were determined using a single-blow transient technique over the range 500 < Rem < 1400. The NTU values of the foams and ball bearings both reduced with increasing Reynolds number (flow velocity). The pressure drop across the matrices increased with the velocity, though the values for the metal foams were much lower than that of the ball bearings, indicating that they may have potential for this type of application.

Type
Invited Feature Paper
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 28 , Issue 17: Focus Issue: Advances in the Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties of Bulk Porous Materials , 14 September 2013 , pp. 2474 - 2482
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Timoumi, Y., Tlili, I., and Nasrallah, S.B.: Performance optimization of Stirling engines. Renewable Energy 33, 2134–2144 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thombare, D.G. and Verma, S.K.: Technological development in the Stirling cycle engines. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 12(1), 1–38 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organ, A.J.: The Regenerator and the Stirling Engine (Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, England, 1997).Google Scholar
Chen, H., Chang, C., and Huang, J.: Effect of oversize in wire-screen matrix to the matrix holding tube on regenerator thermal performance. Cryogenics 36(5), 365–372 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, M., Yanashita, L., and Chisaka, F.: Flow and heat transfer characteristics of the Stirling engine regenerator in an oscillating flow. JSME Int. J. 33(2), 283–289 (1990).Google Scholar
Conde, Y., Despois, J.F., Goodall, R., Marmottant, A., Salvo, L., San Marchi, C., and Mortensen, A.: Replication processing of highly porous materials. Adv. Eng. Mater. 8(9), 795–803 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, L.S. and London, A.L.: Heat-transfer and flow-friction characteristics of woven-screen and crossed-rod matrixes. Trans. ASME 79, 1558–1570 (1957).Google Scholar
Ebbing, D.D. and Gammon, S.D.: General Chemistry, 9th ed. (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA, 2009).Google Scholar
Goodall, R. and Mortensen, A.: Microcellular aluminum? Child’s play! Adv. Eng. Mater. 9(11), 951–954 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, E.W., Gioux, G., Onck, P., and Gibson, L.J.: Size effects in ductile cellular solids. Part II: Experimental results. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43, 701–713 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Standard: Measurement of Fluid Flow by Means of Pressure Differential Devices (The British Standard Institution, BSI EN ISO, 2007).Google Scholar
Cengel, Y.A. and Boles, M.A.: Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 7th. Ed. (McGraw-Hill, London, England, 2011).Google Scholar
Schumann, T.E.W.: Heat transfer: A liquid flowing through a porous prism. J. Franklin Inst. 208(3), 405–416 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnas, C.C.: Heat transfer from a gas stream to bed of broken solids. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 22, 721–731 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, G.L.: Heat Transfer and Flow Friction Characteristics of Porous Solids (Stanford University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford, CA, 1950).Google Scholar
Liang, C.Y. and Yang, W.J.: Modified single-blow technique for performance evaluation on heat transfer surfaces. J. Heat Transfer-Trans. ASME 97(1), 16–21 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Z.H., Li, M.L., Wu, Y.W., and Ren, H.S.: A modified selected point matching technique for testing compact heat exchanger surfaces. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 27(7), 971–978 (1984).Google Scholar
Kohlmayr, G.F.: Exact maximum slopes for transient matrix heat-transfer testing. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 9(7), 671–680 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggs, P.J. and Burns, D.: Single-blow experimental prediction of heat transfer coefficients: A comparison of four commonly used techniques. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 1(3), 243–251 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darabi, F.: Heat and momentum transfer in packed beds. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, England, 1982.Google Scholar
Baclic, B.S., Gvozdenac, D.D., Sekulic, D.P., and Becic, E.J.: Laminar heat transfer characteristics of a plate-louver fin surface obtained by the differential fluid enthalpy method. Adv. Heat Exch. Des. 66, 21–27 (1986).Google Scholar
Chen, H. and Chang, C.: Measurements of thermal performance of cryocooler regenerators using an improved single-blow method. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 40(10), 2341–2349 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C., Hung, S., Ding, P., and Chen, H.: Experimental evaluation of thermal performance of Gifford-McMahon regenerator using an improved single-blow model with radial conduction. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 42, 405–413 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, A., Wagner, A., Aste, T., Hermann, H., and Stoyan, D.: Specific surface area and volume fraction of the cherry-pit model with packed pits. J. Phys. Chem. B 113(22), 7780–7784 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomsma, K., Poulikakos, D., and Zwick, F.: Metal foams as compact high performance heat exchangers. Mech. Mater. 35, 1161–1176 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukhan, N. and Chen, C.: Heat transfer measurements in metal foam subjected to constant heat flux. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 32, 624–631 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Despois, J.F. and Mortensen, A.: Permeability of open-pore microcellular materials. Acta Mater. 53, 1381–1388 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonyongmaneerat, Y. and Dunand, D.C.: Ni-Mo-Cr foams processed by casting replication of sodium aluminate preforms. Adv. Eng. Mater. 10(4), 379–383 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFouw, J.D. and Dunand, D.C.: Processing and compressive creep of cast replicated IN792 Ni-base superalloy foams. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 558, 129–133 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, R.: Porous metals: Foams and sponges, in Advances in Powder Metallurgy: Properties, Processing and Applications, edited by Chang, I. and Zhao, Y. (Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, UK, 2013).Google Scholar