Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:27:37.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microindentation and nanoindentation of human fingernails at varying relative humidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Laura Farran
Affiliation:
Materials Science Centre, School of Materials, University of Manchester, M1 7HS, United Kingdom
A. Roland Ennos
Affiliation:
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M1, 3NJ, United Kingdom
Stephen J. Eichhorn*
Affiliation:
Materials Science Centre, School of Materials, University of Manchester, M1 7HS, United Kingdom
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: s.j.eichhorn@manchester.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

The indentation properties of human fingernails at varying humidity are reported. The samples were indented using both microindentation, to obtain their Vickers hardness and also nanoindented using a Berkovich indenter tip. The relative humidity (RH) of the samples was controlled by using salt solutions with a sealed and enclosed environment surrounding the testing equipment. It was shown that the Vickers hardness of the samples is sensitive to RH, with recovery of the nail material more readily occurring for nails tested at >55% RH. This recovery mechanism is discussed in terms of the structure of the nails, and this approach is also suggested as a technique for following recovery mechanisms in natural materials under varying humidity. The hardness obtained by nanoindentation is similar to previously published data, but does not change with humidity. The modulus of the nails is also insensitive to relative humidity, but in the same range as the value derived from the microindentation tests.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Achten, G.: Histpathology of the nail, in The Nail, edited by Pierre, M. (Churchill Livingstone, 1981), p. 1.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Caputo, R., Gasparini, G., and Contini, D.: A freeze-fracture study of the human nail plate. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 272, 117 (1982).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Farren, L., Shayler, S., and Ennos, A.R.: The fracture properties and mechanical design of human fingernails. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 735 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Ramrakhiani, M.: Indentation and hardness studies of human nails. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 15, 341 (1978).Google ScholarPubMed
5.Moran, P., Towler, M.R., Chowdhury, S., Saunders, J., German, M.J., Lawson, N.S., Pollock, H.M., Pillay, I., and Lyons, D.: Preliminary work on the development of a novel detection method for osteoporosis. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 18, 969 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Bonser, R.H.C. and Witter, M.S.: Indentation hardness of the bill keratin of the European starling. Condor 95, 736 (1993).Google Scholar
7.Bonser, R.H.C.: Melanin and the abrasion resistance of feathers. Condor 97, 590 (1995).Google Scholar
8.Bonser, R.H.C.: Comparative mechanics of bill, claw, and feather keratin in the common starling Sturnus vulgaris. J. Avian Biol. 27, 175 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Seki, Y., Schneider, M.S., and Meyers, M.A.: Structure and mechanical behavior of a toucan beak. Acta Mater. 53, 5281 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Seki, Y., Kad, B., Benson, D., and Meyers, M.A.: The toucan beak: Structure and mechanical response. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 26, 1412 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Parbhu, A.N., Bryson, W.G., and Lal, R.: Disulfide bonds in the outer layer of keratin fibers confer higher mechanical rigidity: Correlative nano-indentation and elasticity measurement with an AFM. Biochem. 38, 11755 (1999).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Huson, M., Church, J., and Heintze, G.: Spectroscopy, microscopy and thermal analysis of the bi-modal melting of Merino wool. Wool Technol. Sheep Breeding 50, 64 (2002).Google Scholar
13.Wei, G.H., Bhushan, B., and Torgerson, P.M.: Nanomechanical characterization of human hair using nanoindentation and SEM. Ultramicroscopy 105, 248 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Finlay, A.Y., Frost, P., Keith, A.D., and Snipes, W.: An assessment of factors influencing flexibility of human fingernails. Br. J. Dermatol. 103, 357 (1980).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Winston, P.W. and Bates, D.H.: Saturated solutions for the control of humidity in biological-research. Ecol. 41, 232 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic-modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Hearle, J.W.S.: A critical review of the structural mechanics of wool and hair fibers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 27, 123 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar