Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:51:09.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The microstructure and morphology of carbon black: A study using small angle neutron scattering and contrast variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Rex P. Hjelm Jr. ,
Wesley A. Wampler ,
Philip A. Seeger  and
Michel Gerspacher
Rex P. Hjelm Jr.*
Affiliation:
Los Alamos Neutron Scattering Center, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545-1663
Wesley A. Wampler
Affiliation:
Sid Richardson Carbon Company, 4825 North Freeway, Fort Worth, Texas 76106
Philip A. Seeger
Affiliation:
Los Alamos Neutron Scattering Center, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545-1663
Michel Gerspacher
Affiliation:
Sid Richardson Carbon Company, 4825 North Freeway, Fort Worth, Texas 76106
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.
Get access

Abstract

This is a study of the form and structure of particles and particle aggregates of an experimental high surface area carbon black (HSA) using small-angle neutron scattering and the method of contrast variation. Contrast variation was effected by studying suspensions of the carbon black in cyclohexane containing different fractions of deuterocyclohexane. We find that the approximately 29 nm diameter USA particles are arranged as small, linear aggregates with an average aggregation number between 4 and 6. The structure averaged over the particle population is best represented by a prolate ellipsoid of revolution with semiaxes 14.5 and 76.4 nm. The surface of the aggregates appears smooth over length scales larger than 1 nm, which places an upper limit on the surface roughness observed by other methods. The internal structure of the aggregates is described by a shell-core model, with the shell density being consistent with a graphitic structure and the core being of lower density, more like amorphous carbon. Some fraction of the core volume (0.1 to 0.2) is taken up by voids that are not accessible to the solvent. An estimate of the shell thickness gives 1 to 2 nm along the ellipsoid minor axis and 6 to 10 nm along the major axis. The particles of the aggregate appear to be fused so that the less dense amorphous core is continuous through the inner parts of the aggregate. The information that can be obtained on the internal structure using contrast variation is limited by heterogeneity in the chemical composition of carbon black aggregates.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 9 , Issue 12 , December 1994 , pp. 3210 - 3222
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Hess, W. M. and Hurd, C. R., in Carbon Black, edited by Donnet, J-B., Bansal, R. C., and Wang, M-J. (Dekker, New York, 1993), pp. 91–106, and references therein.Google Scholar
2Gerspacher, M. and O'Farrell, C.P., Elastomerics 123(4), 35–39 (1991).Google Scholar
3Zerda, T. W., Yang, H., and Gerspacher, M., Rubber Chem. & Tech. 65, 130–138 (1992).Google Scholar
4Donnet, J-B. and Custodéro, E., in Carbon Black, edited by Donnet, J-B., Bansal, R. C., and Wang, M-J. (Dekker, New York, 1993), pp. 221–227.Google Scholar
5Donnet, J-B. and Custodero, E., Carbon 30, 813–815 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Wignall, G. D., Farrar, N. R., and Morris, S., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 69–75 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Wu, W-l., Polymer 23, 1907–1912 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Young, R. J., Al-Khudhairy, D. H. A., and Thomas, A. G., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 1211–1218 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Hjelm, R. P., Wampler, W., and Seeger, P. A., Polymers & Polymer Composites 1, 53A–70A (1993).Google Scholar
10Hjelm, R. P., Wampler, W., and Seeger, P. A., Proceedings of the 143rd Meeting of the American Chemical Society Rubber Division, Denver, 1993, Rubber Division, ACS, Akron, OH, paper no. 32.Google Scholar
11Seeger, P., Hjelm, R. P., and Nutter, M., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 180A, 101–117 (1990).Google Scholar
12Hjelm, R. P., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21, 618–628 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Hjelm, R. P. and Seeger, P. A., Conferences in Physics 97, 367–387 (1989).Google Scholar
14Seeger, P. A. and Hjelm, R. P., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 467–478 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Stuhrmann, H. B. and Duee, E. D., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 8, 538–542 (1975).Google Scholar
16Stuhrmann, H. B., Haas, J., Ibel, K., Koch, M. H. J., and Crichton, R. R., J. Mol. Biol. 100, 399–413 (1976).Google Scholar
17Ibel, K. and Stuhrmann, H. B., J. Mol. Biol. 93, 255–265 (1975).Google Scholar
18Guinier, M. A., Ann. Phys. 12, 161–237 (1939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Gruber, T. C., Zerda, T. W., and Gerspacher, M., Carbon 31, 1209–1210.Google Scholar
20Gruber, T. C., Zerda, T. W., and Gerspacher, M., ACS Rubber Division, 144th Meeting, October 26–29, paper no. 164 (1993).Google Scholar
21Kinoshita, K., Carbon: Electrical and Physicochemical Properties (John Wiley, New York, 1988), p. 12.Google Scholar