Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:36:40.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructure formation and phase selection in the solidification of Al2O3–5 at% SiO2 melts by splat quenching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Mingjun Li ,
Kosuke Nagashio  and
Kazuhiko Kuribayashi
Mingjun Li*
Affiliation:
The Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 3–1-1, Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229–8510, Japan
Kosuke Nagashio
Affiliation:
The Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 3–1-1, Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229–8510, Japan and Department of Materials Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113–8656, Japan
Kazuhiko Kuribayashi
Affiliation:
The Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 3-1-1, Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229–8510, Japan and CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 2-1-6 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan
*
a)To whom all correrspondence should be addressed.mingjun@materials.isas.ac.jp
Get access

Abstract

An Al2O3–5 at% SiO2 specimen was levitated in an Aero-Acoustic Levitation apparatus and then melted when a continuous-wave CO2 laser beam heating system was incorporated. The sample can be highly undercooled when decreasing the laser power. Rapid solidification by splat quenching can be realized at defined temperatures, using well-polished copper as chilling anvils. Microstructure transition from nonfaceted colony to strong faceted dendrites was observed when the melt was quenched at ΔT = 50 K, indicating that a kinetic contribution for roughening the microstructure may be significant for the morphology transition. The impacting, spreading, and solidifying processes were analyzed on the basis of microstructure observation. The additional undercooling was suggested to vary per an exponential relation with distance when the kinetic effect was taken into account. The nucleation behavior was also discussed according to the proposed additional undercoolings to demonstrate the difference in nucleation population at various regions. When the melt undercooling increases to 190 K, a double-phase structure with small polycrystalline inclusion embedded into amorphous matrix was obtained. The continuous cooling transformation profile was proposed to account for the phase selection upon quenching. The present observation and suggested model for acquiring high additional undercoolings are useful in elucidating the work of others.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 17 , Issue 8 , August 2002 , pp. 2026 - 2032
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Klement, K., Willens, R.H., and Duwez, P., Nature 187, 869 (1960). For an excellent review on metallic glass, one can refer to A. Lindsay Greer, Science, 267, 1947 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D., and Cahn, J.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Smith, C.H., in Rapidly Solidified Alloys: Processes, Structures, Properties, Applications, edited by Liebermann, Howard H. (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1993), p. 617.Google Scholar
4.Mishra, R.K., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 5562 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Zaluska, A., Yan, X., Altounian, Z., Strom-Olsen, J.O., Allem, R., and L'Esperance, G., J. Mater. Res. 6, 724 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sarreal, J.A. and Koch, C.C., Mater. Sci. Eng. A A136, 141 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Yavari, A. and Verger-Gaugry, J.L., J. Mater. Sci. 23, 3383 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Abe, Y., Master Thesis, The University of Tokyo, 2000.Google Scholar
9.Volkmann, T., Loeser, W., and Herlach, D.M., Metall. Mater. Trans. A 28A, 453 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hofmeister, W., Bayuzick, R.J., Trapaga, G., Matson, D.M., and Flemings, M.C., in Solidification 1998, edited by Marsh, S.P., Dantzig, J.A., Trivedi, R., Hofmeister, W., Chu, M.G., Lavernia, E.J., and Chun, J-H., (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1998), p. 375.Google Scholar
11.Sarjeant, P.T. and Roy, R., J. Appl. Phys. 38, 4540 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Sömiya, S., Ishigame, M., and Yoshimura, M., Kou-neisu Gijutsu, (Uchida-Rokakuho Pub., Tokyo, Japan, 1987), p. 59.Google Scholar
13.Ando, T. and Shiohara, Y., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 410 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Bhatia, T., Chattopadhyay, K., and Jayaram, V., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 1873 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Weber, J.K. Richard, Felten, J.J., and Nordine, P.C., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 522 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Weber, J.K. Richard, Hampton, D. Scott, Merkley, D.R., Rey, C.A., Zatarski, M.M., and Nordine, P.C., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 456 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Nagashio, K. and Kuribayashi, K., Acta Mater. 49, 1947 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Nagashio, K., Hofmeister, W.H., Gustafson, D.E., Altgilbers, A., Bayuzick, R.J., and Kuribayashi, K., J. Mater. Res. 16, 138 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Bertero, G.A., Hofmeister, W.H., Robinson, M.B., and Bayuzick, R.J., Metall. Trans. A 22A, 2713 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar