Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:26:03.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure of cosputter-deposited metal- and oxide-MoS2 solid lubricant thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. R. Hilton
Affiliation:
Mechanics and Materials Technology Center, The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, California 90245
G. Jayaram
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
L. D. Marks
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Get access

Abstract

The effect of cosputtering small amounts of Ni (3%, 9%) and SbOx (20%) on the final microstructure of MoS2 lubricant thin films has been studied using a combination of scanning and transmission electron microscopy imaging, and electron and x-ray diffraction techniques. The early-growth, near-interface microstructure of both MoS2 and 3% Ni–MoS2 cosputtered films is revealed to be a mixture of (002) basal and elongated, large-size (100) and (110) edge islands. Cosputtering with 9% Ni induces a dramatic change in the microstructure, i.e., primarily basal domains with very small isolated regions of edge islands, while cosputtering with 20% SbOx produces films having no long-range order. The results are compared with and are consistent with previously published x-ray absorption fine structure data. The impact of film morphology on tribological performance is discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Hilton, M. R. and Fleischauer, P. D., Surf. Coat. Technol. 54–55, 435 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Thornton, J. A., JVSTA 4 (6), 3059, NovyDec 1986, and earlier References cited therein.Google Scholar
3.Spalvins, T., ASLE Trans. 14, 267 (1971); 17, 1 (1973); Thin Solid Films 96, 17 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hilton, M. R. and Fleischauer, P. D., in New Materials Approaches to Tribology: Theory and Applications, edited by Pope, L. E., Fehrenbacher, L., and Winer, W. O. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 140, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), p. 227.Google Scholar
5.Hopple, G. B., Keem, J. E., and Loewenthal, S. H., Wear 162–164, 919 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hopple, G. B. and Loewenthal, S. H., Surf. Coat. Technol. 68/69, 398 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hilton, M. R., Surf. Coat. Technol. 68/69, 407 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Loewenthal, S. H., Chou, R. G., Hopple, G. B., and Wenger, W. L., Tribol. Trans. 37 (3), 505 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Fleischauer, P. D. and Bauer, R., Tribol. Trans. 31 (2), 239 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hilton, M. R., Bauer, R., Didziulis, S. V., Dugger, M. T., Keem, J., and Scholhamer, J., Surf. Coat. Technol. 53, 13 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Jayaram, G., Marks, L. D., and Hilton, M. R., Surf. Coat. Technol. 76–77, 393 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Gardos, M. N. and Bohner, J. J., Technical Report AFML-TR-79–4091, Part II, December (1979).Google Scholar
13.Lavik, M. T., Hubble, R. D., and McConnell, B. D., Lubr. Eng. 31, 20 (1975).Google Scholar
14.Zabinski, J. S., Donley, M. S., Walck, S. D., Schneider, T. R., and McDevitt, N. T., Tribol. Trans. 38 (04), 894 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Zabinski, J. S., Donley, M. S., and McDevitt, N. T., Wear 165, 103 (1993), and References cited therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Lince, J. R., Hilton, M. R., and Bommannavar, A. S., J. Mater. Res. 10, 2091 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Lince, J. R., Hilton, M. R., and Bommannavar, A. S., Thin Solid Films 264, 120 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Lince, J. R., Hilton, M. R., and Bommannavar, A. S., Surf. Coat. Technol. 43/44, 640 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Stupp, B. C., Thin Solid Films 84, 257 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Stupp, B. C., Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Solid Lubrication, ASLE SP-14, Soc. Tribologists and Lubrication Engineers (1984), p. 217.Google Scholar
21.Hilton, M. R. and Fleischauer, P. D., Thin Solid Films 172, L81 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Muller, C., Menoud, C., Maillat, M., and Hintermann, H. E., Surf. Coat. Technol. 36, 351 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Hilton, M. R. and Fleischauer, P. D., J. Mater. Res. 5, 406 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Schneider, T., Hohman Plating and Manufacturing, Inc., Dayton, OH, private communication, June 1, 1992.Google Scholar
25.Lince, J. R. and Fleischauer, P. D., J. Mater. Res. 2, 827 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Moser, J. and Lévy, F., Thin Solid Films 240, 56 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Buck, V., Thin Solid Films 139, 157 (1986); Vacuum 36, 89 (1986); Thin Solid Films 198, 157 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Didziulis, S. V., Hilton, M. R., Bauer, R., and Fleischauer, P. D., “Thrust bearing wear life and torque tests of sputter-deposited MoS2 films,” TOR-92(2064)-1, The Aerospace Corporation, October, 1992.Google Scholar
29.Hilton, M. R., Bauer, R., and Fleischauer, P. D., Thin Solid Films 188, 219 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar